Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Price Of Prawns

Singapore leapt 5 places to 10th costliest city in the world in just 6 months, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) survey of 140 cities.

The EIU’s index, which measures the prices of 160 products and services such as food, clothing and utilities, is designed to help companies calculate the pay packages they give to their expatriate employees.

Michael Rigby, 30, an exhibition specialist from Oregon who claims to come to Singapore regularly for work, was apparently not fully apprised of the cost of eating out, especially at National Environment Agency (NEA) run Newton hawker centre. His group of 6 Americans racked up a bill of $491, including a charge of $239 for 8 tiger prawns, which works out to be about $30 per prawn. They chose to eat from stall 43, Tanglin Best BBQ Seafood because their helpers assisted in securing a table at the crowded eatery. One of his guests, a Mr Rubio from Arizona thought the prices were comparable to those of an American restaurant and thought nothing of it. But Rigby decided to lodge the first ever complaint of over-charging against the stall at Newton, on which NEA had just lavished $4.8 million (down from $48 million reported in Straits Times, Tuesday Mar 17) in spruce-up works.

Rigby and his wife Dewi had originally set out to show his friends, all here for the first time, “how safe, clean and honest this island city was.” Actually Rigby should be grateful there was no 7% GST or service charge on the bill. And when the stallholder had returned with four others, in their 40s and well built, to impress upon him that “they didn’t want us to leave without paying,” there was no further altercation that might have be deemed as Voluntarily Causing Hurt under Section 323 of the Penal Code, which is designated as a non-seizable offence. In layman terms, Rigby and his companions could have been pummeled to a pulp, and his unidentifiable assailants could have walked smugly away as they usually do at Boat Quay punch-ups.



http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24448.1

local sports and national development

Why certain local sports and national development are like oil and water

SINGAPORE - Quah Ting Wen’s record-breaking swim at the National Age Group Swimming Championships gave our local sports fans plenty of reasons reasons to cheer. Ditto for Wan Lay Chi’s setting his personal best of 47.74 m in winning the discus event at the 3rd All-Comers Athletics Meet. Singaporeans have every reason to be proud of the exploits of our aforementioned two native born sportsmen and sportswomen.

Logically, sports should come hand in hand with a country’s national development. It is some sort of unspoken universal language that bypasses language, racial, political and social barriers. The enduring image of the Iranian soccer team exchanging momentos with the United States soccer team and posing together for a group photo before their match during World Cup’98 epitomizes this universal language that is sport, bearing in mind the differences between the two countries.

The Grand Old Lady, our National Stadium, was the setting of such scenes of unity. Filled to the brim on most occassions when our national soccer team from the Fandi-Malek-David era and before were playing, spectators from all walks celebrated together when the outcome of the game was in Singapore’s favor. At the same time, they mourned together when our national team suffered a heartbreaking loss.

Thus, the question to ask is what is the impact of this scheme on our national development? Sadly, the verdict is that while the sporting successes is floating high like oil at the top, our national development is relegated to the bottom like water underneath the oil.”

Fast forward to the recent years, certain sports saw the implementation of the Foreign Sports Talent Scheme in a bid to produce instantaneous results at the highest level. A foreign prospect deemed to have good medal winning chances at the international level would be automatically fast-tracked to gain Singapore citizenship. Obviously, the desire for instant sporting success was the raison d’etre of the scheme. And this has culminated in a certain extent of tangible success in prestigious competitions, most notably a silver medal showing by the table tennis team.

Thus, the question to ask is what is the impact of this scheme on our national development? Sadly, the verdict is that while the sporting successes is floating high like oil at the top, our national development is relegated to the bottom like water underneath the oil.

First and foremost, the Foreign Sports Talent Scheme is promoting the philosophy that “there is always a shortcut to success”. And shortcut is the right word. Seems like a quick fix for instant sporting success, isn’t it? I remembered my soccer coach cum mentor always drumming this fact into my head:”Talent allows you to pick up essential elements quickly. If you find that you lack talent in any area, spend more time working extra hard in that area”. What I was taught by my coach was basically the meaning of sports - work hard and better myself. In our sports authorities’ insatiable thirst for success, rather than rely on our local sportsmen, they basically chose the shortcut - importing qualified foreign guns. What happens was that they basically invested in the scouting and subsequent development of these foreign talents. The cynical ones would call that “buying your way to success”. Whatever we want to call it, one thing for sure is that this scheme promotes an unhealthy “there is a shortcut to success” ethos which is detrimental to our national mindset. This ironically defeats the purpose of sports, which is to train hard and reach new heights at every competition.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24447.1

Times really are tough.

I know that the cost of living has gone up and it is very difficult to make a living as a hawker. So if you want to earn extra money from tourists, I think it is alright to charge them more money for tiger prawns. In fact, you should charge American tourists even more because they caused our recession and made our poor GIC and Temasek lose face!

But please do it with more intelligence. This is not some clueless minister ordering mee siam hum- who thinks $491 is peanuts (or tiger prawns). These are tourists who have traveled through South East Asia and know the tricks of our Malaysian and Thai brothers. Our elder brothers in Malaysia and Thailand do it with much more subtlety and sophistication. They overcharge tourists by only 50%; not 500%!

No wonder they think Singaporeans are not street-smart and will laugh when they hear this story. $239 is too much for 8 tiger prawns. Even an idiot will notice such a mistake. Next time just charge $99.95 okay...? You have a better chance of not getting caught!

Please understand that I am not scolding you. I understand that Singaporeans are not very good at counting money. We think a 2% return from CPF is 'wonderful'. We 'rent' a HDB apartment by paying the full price of a house upfront. Our MPs think an 8 month bonus is not a lot... Even our elites at Temasek Holdings think a 30% loss is acceptable.

Yes, the ability to understand numbers is not in our DNA so it is not really your fault. But please don't show your stupidity to the rest of the world. If we keep acting stupid, the Americans would stop teaching 'Singapore Math' to their children.

So my dear friend. If you want to cheat, please cheat properly. Our reputation is at stake.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24446.1

A look at S'pore's Healthcare

A look at S'pore's Healthcare

Saying that healthcare is expensive or cheap in Singapore is nearly a non-statement. Firstly, healthcare is such a general term that it should be neatly cut out for surgical analysis. Healthcare can range from basic illnesses such as cough and flu to catastrophic illnesses like cancer. Healthcare can also be necessary, cosmetic or even luxurious.

Healthcare consumers are also increasingly differentiated; bear in mind Singapore is no longer a fishing village but a teeming city of locals and foreigners. Consumers can range from the extreme poor to the middle class to the uber-rich, and the type of demand races an entire spectrum – foreign medical tourists want luxurious healthcare, while the middle class may demand ‘aesthetic treatment’, and the poor thinks hospital wards with air-conditioning and television sets are no big deal.

Then healthcare providers are specialised too, working in either public or private sectors. People aspiring to join the healthcare sector need not just be doctors; they can be speech therapist, occupational therapist, pharmacist, nurse, intellectual disability psychiatrist…and the list goes on.

In addition, there are also the GPs, the polyclinics, specialist centres and public and private hospitals supplying the demand by consumers. For the GP industry, it is clearly a monopolistically competitive market: large number of small clinics, low barriers to entry and little market power. For the polyclinics and public hospitals markets, there is a duopoly – Singhealth and National Healthcare. But both are managed like not-for-profit organisations, and heavy subsidies are provided for consumers. In the private sector, Raffles Medical Group and ParkwayHealth dominate, with a few other smaller private healthcare suppliers.

Reasonably enough, the private sector will be the one drawing the richer international consumers. However, the government believes Singapore can be a medical hub – and so it allows the Singhealth and National Healthcare to set up international desks. Hence international consumers have a range of choices. What this means for local consumers will be dealt in Part 2.

Interestingly, we do not know for sure if provision of healthcare is a comparative advantage which Singapore enjoys. It makes little economic sense if Singapore tries to be a ‘medical hub’ without ensuring the relative opportunity cost is lower than that of other countries in the region. Some surgeries, and lasik comes to mind, are relatively cheaper in other countries. Foreign consumers will doubtfully come here for treatment.

As healthcare is such a heterogeneous good and service, in some areas Singapore will enjoy comparative advantage; in others, not so. Some sectors such as splitting up Siamese twins have attracted foreign consumers. But it is unsure if the opportunity cost of splitting Siamese twins is indeed relatively lower than that of, say, the UK or US. Hence it is very difficult to judge if Singapore has comparative advantage even in these few sectors where Singaporean surgeries have attained worldwide attention.

However, that being said, it is true Singapore is seen as a symbol of safe and quality medical treatment, and its accessibility, convenience and other facilities (which probably can help to speed up recovery?) are heavy plus points. On the whole, this seems that Singapore has relatively lower opportunity cost in providing healthcare services, and so theoretically it should specialise on being a medical hub, leveraging on its comparative advantage. But as mentioned, there are so many types of healthcare that Singapore cannot enjoy comparative advantage in all.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24445.1

F1 to F9......where are we headed?!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80CqcwHR-UA

This video interview of Leong Sze Hian highlights a number of problems with healthcare, housing and transport faced by ordinary Singaporeans. If you have been reading my blog for the past few years, these problems have been highlighted here many times with the hope that the PAP govt will do something to improve the lives of ordinary Singaporeans. However, little has been done and it is not where we have gone but where we continue to head that worries me most. Why isn't the PAP govt motivated to solves these problems? Why is it so hard for the PAP govt to solve these problems? It is not possible for the PAP govt to be unaware of these problems ...then why have things been allowed to deteriorated so badly in the past 10 years...? Lets go through the root cause of each of these problems and I will show you a consistent pattern behavior and thought of on the part of this govt.

Housing. HDB continues to insist that housing is affordable even as more people default on their HDB loans. Among the solutions being explored to make housing "more affordable" is to put Singaporeans in no-frills housing or downgrade to smaller flats. If HDB flats are truly affordable, how did we get here? Rightfully, the rise of HDB prices has to be kept in line with the household income and the sustainability of this income but this is hardly the case as the rise in HDB flat prices have outstripped the rise of median income. HDB claims that it merely priced its new flats relative to the resale market. But how did the price of flats escalate to such levels? Is market price simply the reflection of demand and supply? There were 2 things that resulted in the escalation of housing prices - the 1st is the liberalisation of CPF for housing[research paper : Link] which caused a large jump in housing prices sometimes termed euphemistically by the PAP govt as 'asset enhancement'. The 2nd is the lengthening loan tenure and expansion of household debt to keep the property price rising - HDB flats used to be paid up in 7-8 years now they take 30 years to pay up. The end result is insufficient funds for retirement and a high household debts that make Singaporean households vulnerable during recession. But who are the prime beneficiaries of high housing prices? Housing loans are wildly profitable for banks, our govt land sales to HDB rake in billions which go into Temasek Holdings for investments and big developers. Our housing market is hardly healthy due to the high levels of debt incurred by Singaporeans for a roof over their heads. During the boom times, people who need a home have to take on huge debts as prices go up and when recession comes, defaults mount and a large number of people get into trouble with the bank.....and Singaporeans have to go through these gyrations 3 times in the past 10 years.




Healthcare. If you're asked to design a healthcare system for Singapore, would you learn from the number 1 healthcare system or the number 20 healthcare system in the world? Before I answer that question lets take a look at the rising cost of healthcare in Singapore. We have been told that cost of healthcare will rise and keep on rising fast so we have to purchase insurance to cover ourselves and set aside sufficient funds should we get sick. Have you asked why healthcare costs have gone from highly affordable to barely affordable -read about the case of the cancer patient needing to raise hundreds of thousands[link] because her insurance only covers $30K of her $400K treatment. Some people who have not had relatives or close ones who got sick still thinks that serious illness can be treated for around $50K- that is just not the case. You sometimes wonder what happens to people who cannot afford to pay up - the hospital will hire debt collectors to chase after these people for payment - some have to take up bank loans or sell their homes to pay for treatment.

Singapore aims to be a medical hub and the goal is to attract 1 million medical tourists by 2012 [link][Link]. This ambition to be a medical hub for rich arabs and millionaire Indonesians have strained our resource tremendously because it caused private hospitals to expand to serve these medical tourists and the pay packets of specialists and surgeons to escalate. There is a case being fought today involving healthcare provider Parkway and one its ex-employees whose job was to market medical services in middle-east and Europe [Link to be provided] - he is suing for $2.2M in commissions for bring patients to Singapore. When it comes to medical services, Singaporeans now have to compete with pocket books of millionaires from around the world. The govt remedy to all this is to make us buy insurance. However, if you listened to Leong Sze Hian's interview carefully, an insurance based approach leaves out hundreds thousands of Singaporeans who cannot be covered or cannot afford the insurance. To find out where we will be in a few years we just have to look at the US which has a similar system. Such a system is prone to cost spirals in which medical costs go up causing insurance premiums to go up. Such a system has also left millions Americans uninsured and the cost of healthcare per American has escalated to be among the highest in the world as the profits for insurance companies and hospitals went up. What we are beginning to adopt is a healthcare system that promises to generate higher and higher profits for various businesses and passes the cost to Singaporeans who become sick.

Now to the question...why did the PAP copy the healthcare system from a country that is ranked 20th (USA) instead of the country that is ranked No. 1 (France)? ....The answer is simple - the French system results in a healthcare cost that is among the lowest per person in the society in developed countries but generate little or no profits for insurance companies, hospitals (which are mostly govt owned).....the choice is obvious for the PAP....

Public Transport. Our main public transport companies (SMRT, SBS) are public listed companies with shareholders who have invested in these companies for profits. If I'm a SMRT shareholder, I would be concerned if the trains are not packed like sardines every morning and the human beings in the train actually have space to swing their arms. I will demand SMRT lower its costs by reducing its frequency so that the utilisation per train goes up and profit goes up. If I were an SMRT shareholder, for the past 5 years I would be smiling because SMRT pays out good dividends and its profits increases year after year[Link]. Last quarter they reported rising profits apparently the recession that is hurting Singaporeans does not hurt SMRT's profits.



Singapore being an island state means that there is no place to run to when cost of living escalates. Yes, our concerned govt encourages us to put our old parents in Johor so save money and they are considering the use of Medisave for overseas medical treatment because many cannot afford to be treated locally anymore. However, what the PAP will not do is change the system to lessen the financial burden on Singaporeans because our debts translate to profits for many business entities and our govt with its complex interests in GLCs and its pro-business ideology simply cannot work solely for the benefit ordinary Singaporeans. So their message to Singaporeans is work harder, work longer and never retire.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24439.1

CDC Bonuses: Take it Back

It has been a year since Bear Stearns, one of the largest global investment banks and trading firms went under in dramatic fashion, sending global financial markets and economies into a seemingly never-ending tailspin. The massive capitulation expected from another spectacular failure of a globally interconnected institution forced the U.S. Government to step in and rescue AIG, the world’s biggest insurer, with a US$85 billion bailout in September last year.

Six months on from the dramatic bailout of AIG, details of bailout money use are made known but are far from being transparent. We now know that US$53 billion went to paying off its debts to foreign banks. Controversially, AIG felt compelled to pay US$165 million in bonuses to its staff in the financial products division – the very division that sunk the conglomerate, and the rest of the world with it, to its knees.

In the grand scheme of things, US$165 million is peanuts compared to the billions that have been poured into economic stimuli, rescue plans and t-loans. But the principle of the matter cannot be overstated. When individuals take unprecedented risks and are later rewarded for their failures through bailouts form the average citizens who do not have the luxury of such safety nets and exorbitant payouts, we are effectively rewarding incompetence and greed. The Merril Lynch bonus fiasco is another case in point.

I have written previously that when taxpayers’ monies are involved, we as taxpayers rightfully are entitled to some amount of accountability and transparency. I harp on this topic again as controversies across the Pacific Ocean are rearing their ugly heads in Singapore.

We have now learnt that two Northwest CDC staff were allegedly given 7 months of bonus and 1 month of AWS for their 2008 performance. We were also informed that only staff at the lower-end of the salary range who will receive a higher performance bonus range. If this were true, then perhaps the majority of us would be able to accept a structure that compensates for lower wage with more varying bonus structures. But alas, the Government and government-linked individuals are once again using their text-book “everything is aboveboard”, “this is not an NKF” reasoning, only to be found wanting later.

Eugene Yeo of the Wayangparty Blog has exposed the fact that the recipients of these bonuses were in fact senior managers; thus altering the structure from sensible to downright excessive.

CDCs are quasi-governmental bodies with the primary role of initiating, planning and managing community programmes to promote community bonding and social cohesion. No doubt some of their work is commendable; but they are ultimately responsible for managing the use of public taxpayer money to finance their activities such as community events and the dispersement of financial aid to the needy. Therefore, their key performance indexes should correlate with their bonuses and be the tied to the efficacy and accessibility of their social safety nets that they provide (i.e. public assistance, comcare…etc). Excessive reward for senior management that concoct elaborate schemes which are increasingly difficult to qualify for let alone survive on is ludicrous and has to be put to a stop.

President Obama is looking into legal options to rescind the bonus payouts of AIG. I hope our own President Nathan or PM Lee would do the same. Can we really do that? I say, in the spirit of Obama, yes we can!

The AIG staff had pre-existing contracts (prior to bailout) that mandated the payment of bonus. But so too did the U.S. auto workers that had to renegotiate their terms all in order to ensure they have an industry to return to after collecting their bonuses and pay checks. Similarly, CDC staff were paid for performances in 2008. But given the severity of the recession we find ourselves in, wouldn’t a larger reduction in the bonus pool and a lower cap for senior management be more prudent? Could the savings in 2008 bonus payout be then channeled into community programmes for the truly needy and these self-sacrificing servers of the community be judged and rewarded on how they alleviate the financial strains of the pre-existing poor and newly created poor? Otherwise taxpayers are made to fund these projects and salaries during booming times and even more so during trying times.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24416.1

Alleged 8-Month Bonus

Ah… bonus, bonus, bonus.

I suspect I am in no position to complain about another person getting his bonus when I was earlier protesting in another blog post and justifying why I should get mine. After all, my current employer got a bail out from the government gahmen of its home country and they wisely decided against giving out a hefty bonus. In my case, it didn’t matter that the branch here was have a record year [in profits], and the foul up was in other locations. That’s not even mentioning that not all of my employer’s funding come solely from donations or gahmen funding.

So if you consider that I am being hypocritical for flaming the North West Community Development Council [NW CDC for short] for allegedly giving out a 8-month bonus to its staff [citation needed] while I justify my right to a bonus, perhaps you should look at some of these facts that I gathered from the Annual Report FY 2007 downloaded here.

See the above? The gahmen gives the NW CDC an annual grant of $1 per resident living in its district for funding its programmes, and the gahmen matches every dollar with $3 or $4 depending on how that money is raised. The gahmen also funds the operations of the CDC offices.

In other words, all of these money are donations and state money. Now recall our outrage when we heard the kind of pay and bonus TT Durai, former CEO of NKF, is getting? (And no, I am not implying or saying that there is any kind of misconduct such as those of Durai and the old NKF here.)

Now, let us take a look from which ministry did the gahmen fund the CDCs. Perhaps it is from the MCYS [see below]?

Hmm.. the MCYS. Isn’t this the very same ministry which decided that it was good enough for the needy taking grants to just have $1 more a day? If they are indeed financing the CDCs, perhaps they don’t have to be so tight with their purse strings anymore if they can look at how they can reduce their expenditure with regard to the CDCs.

You might be concerned that doing so might be of impact to operations of the CDC since the gahmen is where most of the money is coming from. So, let’s look at just how much money does the CDC have. According to figures for FY 2007, they have a whopping S$49.1 million in reserves. That means, for someone to get a 8-month bonus, the figures below would have substantially risen for FY 2008.

So why the heck should the gahmen still give them money considering their current reserves and when even the gahmen itself has cut salaries and bonus to reduce expenditure? In fact, while town councils justify their sinking funds by arguing that it is needed for emergencies, and perhaps even upgrading projects, what are these CDC reserves for? Isn’t part of the money the gahmen pays into these reserves an unnecessary burden the people like you and I have to bear? Perhaps the gahmen should consider giving the money back to all Singaporeans in the form of GST rebates or even, more job credits!

But all of above isn’t any more infuriating than the following:

Dr Teo Ho Pin said: “The mayors do not decide on the salaries, the increments, the bonuses of all our staffs at the CDC… We chair the CDCs, to spearhead the CDCs… I do not know the salaries, I do not know the bonuses of all my staff.”

[粤] 十问九唔知! [Cantonese: Sup Mun Gau Um Zee / Translation: 10 Questions, 9 Don't Know.]

I was actually expecting Teo Ho Pin to give the usual elitist Tali-PAP answer to justify just how outstanding these people are to deserve a 8-month bonus. I also wondered, when outstanding performance gets a 8-month bonus, then how much is average performance getting?

Sadly, Dr “Don’t Know” Teo doesn’t even tell us who might know. Perhaps he doesn’t even know who is the person we can ask either. In fact, It makes me wonder, is there anything he actually bothers enough to know? Even when there is no wrong doing here, it brings to mind former NKF Chairman Richard Yong, who during cross examination in court was exposed for not knowing what he signed when he awarded TT Durai with more money. Is he not required to even approve any of these things when both my branch and HR managers are required to sign on my bonus letter?

It is my considered opinion that this is a dereliction of duty when a person didn’t even consider it his responsibility to watch over the expenditure of something he chaired and spearheaded when it takes money from the gahmen. It is a gross failure to the very people who voted him. Thankfully, this time round he didn’t tell us to be grateful for these individuals, just as we should to the town councils which invested and lost money, even though “Don’t Know” Teo possibly also does not know who made the decision to invest that money. i.e. 凭父拢不知 [Hokkien: Lim Peh Nong Um Zai / Translation: Your father me all also don't know.]

But does he really not know, or simply just plain ‘bo-chup’ [Translation: Can't be bothered]? Here’s another piece of his ‘Teo-isms’:

Dr Teo Ho Pin then said: “The economy only start to worsen during the last 3 months of 2008. The performance of the economy during the first 9 months is still not bad. We have to look at the matter from the entire year’s perspective. Hence, it is not unreasonable for CDC staff to receive 8 months of bonuses.”

Familiar argument here! Because this is what some unhappy traders overseas used as argument when they tried to justify their ‘right’ to their bonus.

So do you not or do you know now, Dr Teo? Make up your mind!

Whatever the case is, as one of my netizen friend said, the Tali-PAP needs a new publicist. If the Tali-PAP does not want to consider that, then they should consider asking Dr ‘Toxic Asset’ Teo to retire before the next election. He clearly isn’t cut to be in whatever position(s) he is in now. Of course, they shouldn’t forget to ask ‘Wua Kan Seng’ to join him too when they are at that!


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24415.1


Look how disconnected they are

I shake my head when I see the whole story unfold before my very eyes.

It started off with an open letter to Dr Teo Ho Pin about Northwest CDC staff getting 8 months bonus in 2008. I also blog about it saying that its a good opportunity for the government to engage the new media. After several attempts to get official comments, Dr Teo finally replied saying that it’s confidential.

What kind of nonsense is that? We are not asking you to name who got exactly how much bonus. We just want to know if some staff got 8 months bonus. No need name the person out.

Then on Sunday, Dr Teo Ho Pin spoke to the media and said he don’t know the salary and bonus of the staff of North West CDC. OK, brilliant. From “confidential” to “I don’t know”. Perhaps “Confidential” is the new word for “I don’t know.” His interview with the media was very well drafted. Check out his interview with the media.

And Dr Teo squandered an opportunity to engage the New Media. (Gee…. I think I remember that phase from somewhere.) He could had reply directly to the source of this rumors which is the new media. But instead, he kept his silent until the mainstream media spoke to him. I thought you guys are going to leverage on the New Media? Well, I guess not.

So, it’s the People Association or Workforce Development Agency who decide on the salary and bonus of community development council staff. Not the Mayor. Then why didn’t you say so earlier Dr Teo? And now that it has been brought to your attention, don’t you, as a Mayor of North West CDC and a Member of Parliament of Bukit Panjang, feel that it is your duty and obligations to find out what exactly is going on in the CDC that is under your charge? Why are some of the staff getting such high bonus, especially during a recession?

No, it seems like you don’t know and you don’t care. All you want is this issue to get off your back. OK, since it is none of your business, everybody turn their attention at People Association and Workforce Development Agency.

And interestingly enough, before we can make enough noise, Mr Lim Boon Heng (hey, that’s my MP) steps out and defended the need for Community Development Councils (CDCs) to have flexibility in rewarding staff, pointing out that is how companies around the world operate. He stated that fixed monthly pay is kept down and the bonuses vary according to performance to motivate people to perform, because if a person does badly, he will not get the same high bonus. So this ensures that the reward system is fair and responsive to the needs of the organisation. He also advised people ‘not to begrudge the few people who got very high bonuses’.

Mr Lim, perhaps you don’t know that a lot of people in the private sector are having their salary and bonus cut because of this recession. (Some even lose their jobs) Are they not performing well? Nope, they got a pay cut because of the economic situation. I’m sure there are people in the private sector who are performing just as well as your staff in North West CDC. And if the people in the private sectors are getting their pay and bonus cut, why is the government sector getting excessive bonus? It’s shocking to see you defending the 8 months bonus. Are you so disconnected from the rest of Singapore to the extend that you think 8 months bonus is perfectly alright?

And come to think of it, now that we are in a recession, isn’t it about time we relook into the Minister’s salary?

In the mean time, the People’s Association said that salaries are in line with the National Wages Council’s guidelines, and that the association had moved to performance-based pay to reward and incentivise staff fairly and responsively.

Wow, for the past week, everyone kept quiet, saying it is confidential. Now everyone come out and talk about it. Although they never confirm or deny if any of the North West CDC staff (or staffs) got 8 months bonus, I think the answer is pretty clear already.

Now, the Salary and Bonus is based on National Wages Council’s guideline. If that is correct, then the high performance staffs in the private sectors should at least get 6 months bonus right? How can that be wrong? You mean the private sector don’t follow the NWC’s guideline meh? But if you think about it, if every private sector follow the NWC’s guideline and give their high performing staff 8 months bonus, I think some of them will be in financial problem soon.

And if PA and WDA really follow the NWC’s guideline and give 8 months bonus to their staff, I think we seriously need to relook into the NWC’s guideline. How the heck did someone get 8 months bonus? Even if we are not in a recession, 8 months bonus is a lot of money.

So can someone please justify why some of the staff at North West CDC received 8 months bonus? Did someone managed to find to cure to Singapore’s unemployment rate or something?

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=24414.1

News Blackout

News Blackout

Since the online outcry has broken out over two staff from the Northwest Community Development Council (CDC) received bonuses of eight months last year, including the 13th month bonus, the ST and CNA have imposed a News Blackout over the following 2 news reports:
CDC bonuses explained
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_350846.html
Northwest CDC mayor says PA, WDA decide on staff pay, bonuses
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/415302/1/.html

Fortunately, the 2 news reports still can be found at: CDC bonuses explained
http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=sunkopitiam&msg=24248.1
Northwest CDC mayor says PA, WDA decide on staff pay, bonuses
http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=sunkopitiam&msg=24080.4

What is the reason for blacking out the news reports? How low can the 154th ST and CNA go?

http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=sunkopitiam&msg=24335.1