Sunday, May 3, 2009

Booting of new guard ends AWARE catfight

Booting of new guard ends AWARE catfight
STOMPer Cedric is relieved that the "very public catfight" is over, with Josie Lau's team booted out by an overwhelming vote of no-confidence last evening on May 2.
Josie Lau, 48, and her team had seized control of the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) in March.
In his email dated May 3:
"I'm really glad this very public catfight is over.
"I was there at the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM), it was quite clear that Ms Lau's team was no match for the louder 'old guard'.
"I swear at a certain point of time, the meeting was going to erupt into chaos, but luckily the women remained civilised.
"I guess when it comes to power struggles among women, hell hath no fury too."
Related stories:
Related video:


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.97

Video coverage of Aware EOGM

Video coverage of Aware EOGM

Josie Lau and team defeated soundly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGbmNVvFfXY

Josie Lau and team admit defeat and step down
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjBljKf0RSw

Constance Singam joyous with results
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_9VdbvRAoI

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.330

Voted out but still willing to contribute

Voted out but still willing to contribute

Sunday, 3 May 2009

By Terence Lee

DESPITE the controversy that has erupted, Ms Josie Lau and her team would still contribute their expertise to AWARE if asked.

Speaking at a press conference after their resignation from the women’s organisation, the team said that their original purposes for joining AWARE has not changed.

Josie explained that she was initially asked to join the organisation because of her marketing and fundraising expertise, and she hopes to continue doing that.

Currently, the team has no future plans. They were non-commital when quizzed about whether they would set up their own organisation promoting their own beliefs and values.

“We’ve yet to sit down over coffee and discuss our future plans,” said Honorary Treasurer Maureen Ong.

Despite the strong opposition to their leadership, the team stands firm in their beliefs. They believe they have the constitutional right to stay in the organisation, but the only reason they stepped down was really “for the sake of AWARE.”

“When I joined,” said Ms Ong, “I was simply only answering Constance Singam’s call for new blood.”

She could not understand what caused this reversal in AWARE’s attitude.

The team once again reiterated that there was no ulterior motive for them joining AWARE, said Ms Lau. There was no conspiracy, and in fact she does not know any of the Committee members except for a few of them, but even those were passing acquantances.

“I did not come in knowing who would run with me,” said Ms Lau. In fact, she revealed that there were quite a lot of minority people that stood up for elections at the AGM, but they were not voted in.

The team also criticised the discrimination against people with “pro-family” views, citing the just-concluded meeting as an example.

When asked about whether they expected such a reaction from the crowd, the team said that they “expected it” because of the negative reaction and attention it has already spawned in the past month.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.328

Aware Chaos - “Shut up and sit down”

Chaos - “Shut up and sit down”
Sunday, 3 May 2009

By Terence Lee and Choo Zheng Xi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-VYBZgwGdg

“SIT down and shut up!”

That was ex-Honorary Treasurer Sally Ang’s (picture left, in red) retorted to the heckling and disruptions of Ms Josie Lau’s address at the EGM. However, instead of silencing the crowd, more howls of protest followed, including cries to remove Ms Ang from the stage.

Angry arms flayed, voices bayed for blood, some from the Aware Old Guard came up to the front, and with both hands on the legal counsel’s table, beckoned him to remove the Executive Committee for speaking “vulgarities.” Another member, also at the table, shouted, “What vulgarities?”

Resembling more of a rowdy football crowd, the noise had struck some raw nerves among the Executive Committee. “People with unruly behaviour will be escorted out of this hall,” said Honorary Secratary Jenica Chua earlier, perturbed by the disruptions to Ms Josie Lau’s speech.

She then repeated the same warning, this time ordering the auxilary police to escort disruptors out. They included people taking flash photography and video recordings. However, in the face of such chaos, even the security personnel were powerless.

Such was the fury and passion displayed throughout the EGM.

Earlier on, at the beginning of the meeting, Ms Lau attempted to eject Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Mr Siew Kum Hong (right) from his seat amongst ordinary voting members. He was seated amongst the previous Aware presidents, acting as their legal advisor.

Men, who are associate members and not granted voting rights, were allotted separate seats from voting members. Mr Siew asserted his right to be with the old Aware Committee, and Ms Lau backed down from her position to loud jeering.

Chaos then broke out when Ms Lau attempted to open the meeting with a President’s address, but had problems getting through her first sentence because of the audience’s vocal insistence that she proceed with the vote of no confidence.

Not deterred, Aware members also protested over the fact that the mikes on the floor were not switched on. “On the mike!” they shouted repeatedly. An Aware member was even seen trying to bring a loud hailer to the front, although it was never used.

“What are you afraid of?” a lady hollered, to which Ms Lau replied, “What are you afraid of? Let me finish my business.”

Even the small section of men sitting at the side refused to be left out — they booed and shouted at Ms Josie Lau and team, who were desperately trying to maintain order. Eventually, Ms Lau made a compromise: the floor mikes would be switched on.

It took a total of 35 minutes for her to start the address. But even then, the speech was punctuated with jeers.

The supporters of Ms Lau’s team were a distinct minority. They replied to the heckling with dignified silence, occasionally clapping approvingly whenever the Executive Committee said something. But even as they complained about the “unruly” behaviour of the crowd, even they would fall victim to unbridled anger.

A young lady was particularly perturbed when the Old Guard later on requested that the ballot boxes be withheld for inspection. She had already dropped her ballot in — and was mad that they were allegedly trying to “tamper” with votes. Ms Braema Mathi went over to reason with her, but her anger would not subside.

Later on, as members of Aware addressed the crowd, she made an attempt to go for the mike, but was stopped by other members who were apparantly pro-Old Guard. She got into a temper, and a shouting match ensued.

Nevertheless, the other supporters of Ms Lau’s team preferred to protest with folded arms, pursed lips, and utterances amongst themselves.

The excitement died down somewhat when it became apparant that the torrent of criticism against The Executive Committee would not subside. In fact, some of Ms Lau’s supporters left towards the end of the meeting, leaving vacant seats. And all these while, Ms Thio Su Mien sat quietly at the front directly in front of the Executive Committee, only speaking when asked to.

Gradually, what ever opposition that was left seemed to have totally evaporated. When the Executive Committee was asked to consider tendering their resignation — they took longer than expected, leading the Old Guard to think they had left the building.

They only returned twenty minutes later, when half the new Committee was already nominated, and much to the surprise of everyone. Nonetheless, there would be no more conflict, only resigned defeat, and picture-perfect smiles to go along with it.

It was clear even before the meeting that there would be huge divisions and dramatic conflict — the distinction between both factions were loud and clear.

Controversy arose when some red shirts allegedly tried bring some Aware members up to the top floor, bypassing the queue. This was met with unhappiness by other members and was dealt with swiftly.

Even in the hall right before the meeting, the Executive Committee mostly kept to themselves at the front row, guarded by two auxilary policemen. In contrast, the past presidents were seen walking around talking to people and shaking hands.

Ex-Aware president Braema Mathi was seen walking to them exchanging formalities and beaming a smile. Neither party gave an indication of the thunderous scorn that was to follow.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.327

Aware members demand: “Account for our money!”

Aware members demand: “Account for our money!”

Sunday, 3 May 2009

By Choo Zheng Xi and Khairulanwar

THE drama didn’t let up while votes were being tallied by external auditors Deloitte and Touche.

From 4.30 pm till the final count at 7.30pm, member after member continued to castigate the new committee on a range of issues from their understanding of feminism to the amount of money they had spent so far a month into their term.

One burning issue members demanded an answer to was how much of Aware’s funds has been spent in the last month. The Aware constitution requires the Executive Committee to seek the consent of members before approving expenditures above $20,000.

One member pointedly asked Honorary Treasurer Maureen Ong if her committee had used more than $20,000 in organising the EGM, and noted asked if her committee had acted beyond the powers granted to them in the Aware constitution. Picking up the question of financing, members from the floor started demanding an estimate for how much had been spent so far.

Ms Ong announced that an estimated $80,000 had been spent on lawyers, auditors, and venue bookings. This brought the audience to its feet in anger.

Calling the spending “extravagant”, Aware member Loretta Chen said it was the “turning point” as it indicated that the team headed by Ms Josie Lau “may not be the best to lead AWARE”, despite being “well-meaning women”. Running a group such as AWARE required a set of values that was different from their “corporate ethics.”

Mark Ho, the legal adviser to the Old Guard, questioned whether Josie Lau’s exco tried to “reach out” and “call for help” in organizing the EGM, to save on fees for event organizers, legal help and the various miscellanies.

Social worker Suzanne Jarzabkowska commented that in “an NGO culture, money is the last thing we reach for” – preferring to “work by consensus” and leveraging on the “network” of civil society. By resorting to a “chequebook culture”, it underlined that Ms Lau’s team “does not understand how NGO works.”

Ms Bridget Lew, the director of HOME, derided the expenditure as “shameful” for an NGO whose ethics are usually to “work hard (and) struggle hard.”

It is unclear at this point of time how Aware will defray the costs for the expenditure, or whether Ms Lau’s team will bear any of the costs.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.324

Sectarian Christians replaced by Sectarian Gays - So what's the difference?

Sectarian Christians replaced by Sectarian Gays - So what's the difference?

Can't help feeling that the original, old Aware's agenda is centred on gay and lesbian issues. About every other speaker from the old guards' supporters talked about homosexuality and sexual orientation. As if there isn't any other female minorities.

Here are some facts that happened at the EGM:

1. The Old Guard did not deny that the trainer's manual that was put up online, which teaches young girls that homo sex is natural, is authentic. This is notwithstanding the fact that MOE finds that it warrants an investigation.

2. The Old Guard said that the topic of mentioning homo sex in schools is natural, is only about a minute or so.

3. About more than 50% of the speakers supporting the Old Guard spoke about homosexuality.

4. 45% of the speakers supporting the Old Guard spoke against Josie and gang, be it their management style or takeover style.

5. Less than 5% of the speakers spoke about what the Old Guard did for AWARE and women in Singapore.

As a parent and member of the public, I see that the above shows that the Old Guard is adamant, unrepentant and unmoved by the fact that they have breached parents' trust, when they covertly sneaked in pro-homo topics in the CSE in schools.

Luckily for parents, MOE is now investigating the case.

Items 1 and 2 show that there exists a planned, methodical system to indoctrinate young girls as young as 12 in schools that homo is a natural practice - and they still intend to carry that plan out - notwithstanding the fact that MOE is now investigating Aware's CSE programme.

Items 3 shows that AWARE is now under the control of gays and lesbians.

Item 4 - no comment. That is in order for an EGM.

Item 5 shows that women in Singapore is currently last on the current AWARE's (ie Dana's group now) agenda.

A Christian interest is replaced with gay interest. So what is the difference?


From my wife's perspective.

My wife joined AWARE only just before the EGM. She is not affiliated to either side. When she arrived, she found a long queue. Seeing some white shirts, she initially thought they were ushers for AWARE. It later turned out that they were supporters of the old guard. She was led by a team of white shirts to nowhere round a wild goose chase. After about 20 to 30 minutes later, she was finally directed by genuine ushers back into the very queue she was led away from by the white shirts.

On hindsight, she felt that the old guards' group deliberately pretended to be officials of AWARE to confuse members of the public. At one stage she was evenly brazenly asked who was she supporting - the old or the new.

My wife spoke to some other members of the public, who like her were non-partisan, and found that they too felt they had been "mishandled" by the group of white shirts.

My wife also observed that supporters of the old group hogged the microphone. Speakers who did not support the old guard were booed and jeered. They numbered less than five, because dozens of Old guard supporters hogged the microphone. Supporters of the old guard on the other hand were cheered to the point that the chairperson could not reply to what was said by people from the floor.

Overall scenario was the crowd was boorish, boisterous and gangster-like.

The mass media also appears to favour the old guard. Channelnews Asia reported that speakers from all walks of life spoke for pluralism. Not quite true. About more than 50% spoke about gay and lesbians and less than 5% spoke about women in general. The rest attacked Josie and gang.

My wife was stunned and shocked that some reporters of the media even cheered when supporters of the old guard made points about gays/lesbians and/or attacks on Josie and gang.

But the one that takes the cake was the reporter who yelled and jumped with joy when an announcement was made that the motion of no confidence against the EXCO was carried out.

Aren't reporters supposed to impartial? Isn't it like the referee celebrating a goal when one side scores?

That about explains why the MSM seems to crucify Josie and gang, while making Old Guard look they are for secularism and pluralism, when it was obvious to members of the public who were at the EGM, the issue closest to the hearts of the supporters of Old Guard, was about gay rights.

That is my say from a member of the public, a parent, who does not have any affiliation with Christian groups, gay groups, old guard or new guard.

Thought I need to let readers of this blog know that what you hear and see from the media and pro-gay blogs has been grossly misrepresented.

Today, I don't believe that the AWARE is for pluralism. It is still as sectarian as Josie's group. Only difference is that Josie's group is filled with pro-Christians, while Dana's group is filled with pro-gays and lesbians. Also, at least Josie's group was civil.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.323

Aware EOGM doomed from the start for New Group!

Let's put it this way ..when the press and media are explicitly and government implicitly in support of the Old guards..how can the New Guards win? And Look at Pearl Forss of CNA so happy when she announced the results! From the very minute Josie was reprimanded by her bank the DBS for her role in AWARE, it was clear she was somewhat a pawn, fighting the odds! God in heaven and perhaps also on earth... wasn't willing to give her that miracle to win!

Of course Derek Hong's about turn did not help either . As to why the about turn of a Pastor who has always been strong in his views, your guess is as good as mine.

The only good thing about the whole issue is that parents are now more AWARE that what is recommended by AWARE in the sex education curriculum MAY NOT be the right sort of value teachings, they want for their kids. SECONDLY that if they do not voice their concerns regarding any issue, the government takes it to mean "everything is fine !"

The MOE also cannot support the new Guard simply because to do so would be tantamount to admitting they have not been vigilant enough in their scrutiny of Aware's sex education curriculum for schools.

Dr Thio's appearance as Femininist mentor certainly did not help the cause of the new guards. She is known for her conservative and perhaps more ultra extreme conservative Christian views. The Old Guards boosted with the media reports of warnings from government leaders as well as socially correct viewpoints of various religious leaders of different religions, very cleverly play the religious card-(that this was a secular organisation turning Christian)

Now playing along that line of reasoning, they quickily won over supporters of other religious inclinations. Rightly or wrongly - the "fear factor came into the minds of those of other religious persuasions- "oh we cannot allow this organistion to be "taken over " by Christians. Though logically, no decent Muslim Hindu or Buddhist would have agreed that " anal sex can be healthy ..or homo is neutral or Pink family is ok." as taught in the aware sex education curriculum Thus the strong significance religion still holds- in the political positioning of issues here.

Dr Thio may not realise this , but by terming herself as Feminist Mentor , it could have been viewed as if she was ridiculing the MM . When the MM is termed Mentor ...it makes sense NOT to use the same terminology "mentor". She could have called herself Senior member, Guide, Honorary Adviser ..whatever but she unwittingly chose to call herself a Feminist Mentor!

As I had said earlier I applaud Josie for her daring, in taking on the marauding horde of lesbians and gays, but she probably didn't realise in reality how formidable they can be. HER heart and spirit may have been in the right place for the sake of our kids , but she could be wearing shoes too big for her feet, based upon her poor performance at the EOGM. She seemed to have lost her cool too many times, unfortunately! Nevertheless, she should be commended for at least trying.

For those who have followed the events closely, the whole episode clearly shows how potent the "invisible hand " of the government functions, in influencing success or failure of ANY group seeking office even in organisations- secular and/or religious.

Without the tacit support of the government ( even when they say they do not interfere) and without the "help " of the press in "shaping" public opinion , it is difficult for any group to succeed in their objective! And that is reality for us in Singapore!


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.314

Former AWARE president Dana Lam takes office as new president

Former AWARE president Dana Lam takes office as new president
By Cheryl Lim, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 03 May 2009 0318 hrs

Photos 2 of 2 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

Some 3,000 people turn up for AWARE EGM
Related News

Josie Lau's exco resigned "for the sake of AWARE"

Newly-elected AWARE Exco to amend constitution

AWARE's new Exco has spent some S$90,000 since taking office

New Exco of AWARE given vote of no confidence

Some 3,000 people turn up for AWARE EGM
Video
Newly-elected President Dana Lam speaks on the next step for AWARE
Josie Lau's exco responds to heated comments at AWARE's EGM
New Exco of AWARE steps down after given vote of no confidence
Some 3,000 people turn up for AWARE EGM
Special Report
AWARE Dispute

SINGAPORE : Ms Dana Lam is the new president of AWARE (Association for Woman's Action and Research).

This development took place almost seven hours after the extraordinary meeting began at Suntec City.

Requests were made for Ms Josie Lau and her team to step down from office.

While her legal counsel said Ms Lau and her team were not legally obliged to do so, a short break was called for them to decide if they would step down.

Ms Lau's legal counsel said that in while the exco had been elected into office for a finite period of time, office bearers in similar situations would usually step down out of courtesy, custom and common sense would.

But when the team headed by Ms Lau along with then honorary secretary Ms Jenica Chua, failed to return after 20 minutes, members decided they could not wait any longer, and declared that the exco led by Lau has resigned.

A vote was also taken on the motion to remove Ms Lau's team from office.

Order of business then moved to the voting in of office bearers for the new executive committee - former AWARE president Danna Lam was voted in as president, with former honorary treasurer Chew I-Jin voted into office, this time as vice-president.

Other members on the team included familiar faces of former exco members, Corinna Lim and Margaret Thomas, with new faces making up almost half the team.

The full list of the newly-elected exco is as follows -

Dana Lam, President
Chew I-Jin, Vice President
Yap Ching Wi, Honorary Secretary
Corinna Lim, Assisitant Honorary Secretary
Tan Joo Hymn, Honorary Treasurer
Lim Seow Yuin, Assistant Honorary Treasurer
Committee Members - Margaret Thomas, Hafizah Osman, Nancy Griffiths, Nicole Tan, Joanna D' Cruz, Martha Lee

But before the full list of office bearers was voted in, Ms Lau and her team made a surprise return, and announced they would be resigning.

At a separate news conference, Miss Lau said she was not surprised by the results.

But does the outcome spell the end to collaborations with AWARE?

"If the new team should invite me back to advise on education and training, I'd be more than willing to do that," said Charlotte Wong, former AWARE vice-president.

Speaking to the media, the new AWARE President Ms Lam said her first task would be to arrange for transition of office.

"(We'll) take back control of our centre, and see whether we can restore some of the confidence that has been lost over the last few weeks. Don't forget that we have had quite a number of people who have resigned. And some people are new, and have been employed by the new executive committee. So, I think there is really quite a lot of things we will have to do," said Lam.

Singapore Council of Women's Organisations (SCWO) said it is pleased to note that AWARE has reached a resolution in a democratic manner.

In a statement, President of SCWO, Dr Ann Tan said SCWO would like to underscore once again the need for civil societies to function as and remain as secular organisations so that all will stand to benefit from their good works. And that it trusts that AWARE will fulfil the mandate that they have been given to carry on with their work.

SCWO looks forward to working with AWARE to achieve common goals for the well being of the women of Singapore. - CNA /ls


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.96

The day we all became Aware

Aware Saga

7 MAR 1986:

The day we all became Aware
Founders of women's group shared concern for women issues in society
By Benson Ang
May 03, 2009 Print Ready Email Article

BACK in the eighties, a new women's group held its forums at Queenstown library, just across the road from the church where six of today's new exco members worship.
Click to see larger image

Back then, the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) was driven by ideals. Now it is largely seen as farcical, with furious in-fighting, disputes and politicking.

Mention Aware today and one is likely to think of a catfight among two groups of women.

Other images: Christians taking on pro-gay groups, lockouts with police called in, dramatic press conferences.

Where is the dignity? Where is the sense of mission or unity?

It was hard work, said founding member Zaibun Siraj recalling the beginning, but 'we had such fun'.

That was back in 1984, when the organisation was founded 'quite by accident', said the first Aware president, Mrs Lena Lim U Wen, 71.

She set up Select Books in 1976, and was its first managing director until 2004 when she retired.

The idea for Aware arose from a forum called 'Women's Choices, Women's Lives' at the National University of Singapore Society, in November 1984, attended by about 50 women.

Click to see larger image
THE ORIGINAL: This photo taken in 1986 shows founding members of Aware - (from left) Dr Lai Ah Eng, Ms Margaret Thomas, Ms Chua Siew Keng, Ms Kanwaljit Soin and Mrs Lena Lim. --ST FILE PICTURE

Aware's founding members - among them Mrs Hedwig Anuar, Dr Lai Ah Eng, MsZaibun Siraj, Dr Vivienne Wee, Ms Chua Siew Keng, Ms Evelyn Wong, and Mrs Lim - were unhappy about several issues discussed in the 1983 National Day Rally.

They were against the population policies then, such as one which gave graduate mothers priority in getting their children registered in their preferred school.

As the women were dispersing, Ms Wong called out rhetorically: 'What are we going to do now?'

About 15 women decided to meet exactly one month later to talk about the way forward.

Some, like Mrs Lim, knew about women whose husbands had deserted them, and of women who had been battered for years, but who were too afraid to speak up for fear of airing dirty linen in public.

Said Mrs Lim: 'In those days, they would hide their bruises because they couldn't bear the shame of letting people know they were beaten.'

She also knew women who led bitter, disgruntled lives as second and third wives.

She swore to work for them and never to allow herself to be in such a situation.

Said Dr Lai, 54, a social scientist: 'We had the same feeling about wanting to do something for women in general. For me, these concerns also affect the family, the community and society at large.'

These women could not find an existing women's organisation that shared similar views, so they decided to start a new organisation.

Click to see larger image
HELP FOR WOMEN: Mrs Lena Lim (above) and Mrs Hedwig Anuar shared a strong concern for women's issues. Mrs Anuar (top) came up with the organisation's name. --TNP PICTURE: MOHD ISHAK, BT FILE PICTURE

And that eventually grew to become Aware.

Said Mrs Lim: 'When we started out, we were unpopular with men, women and the authorities.

'Back then, when we forwarded victims of domestic violence to the police, we were seen as meddling in police matters.'

'Women's Freedom'

Mrs Anuar, 80, the first woman to be appointed director of the National Library in 1965, came up with the name.

She joked that Aware could have been called 'Singapore Women', 'Women's Liberty' or 'Women's Freedom'.

A friend of Mrs Lim came up with the Aware logo, consisting of the name and the symbol for female.

For a year, they operated as a pro-tem committee, writing and refining their constitution until it was approved by the Singapore Registrar of Societies.

On 9 Dec 1985, the founding members had their first official meeting.

And on 7 March 1986, Aware was formally launched at the Cairnhill Community Centre.

For four years, the members met in their kitchens, waiting rooms and offices, mostly in the evenings after work.

The 'host' would normally prepare some food for the rest. They paid for stationery and food from their own pockets.

There were no computers, so sub-committee heads had to use typewriters to churn out circulars and documents.

Aware's first forums and seminars were held at community centres and libraries, particularly the Queenstown library.

It was only in 1990 that the first Aware Centre was established out, in a second storey shophouse on Race Course Road. It was made available for use through Ms Claire Chiang, also an Aware member.

Mrs Lim said: 'One room was for the helpline, one for files, and the corridor was for meetings.'

Mrs Anuar recalled: 'On the first storey was an Indian restaurant, and we often ended up having Indian food for lunch, because it was right in front of us.'

She added that money then was a problem, and all the furniture was donated and second-hand. There were very few chairs and, during meetings, some members sat on straw mats.

Mrs Lim said: 'It was okay, we didn't mind.'

She added: 'I grew in Aware. I have a fear of public speaking, which I had to face up to whenever I had to make speeches as president. I learnt a lot.'

Through it all, the issues were what drove the founding leaders. Ms Zaibun said: 'There were just a few of us in that original committee, but we took on every single issue related to women - from women in the civil service, media, education.

'That's what Aware is for - to represent all women, and to address all issues. And in the process, we had such fun.'


I regret actions: Pastor Hong

FURTHER to Bishop John Chew's and my statement of 1 May 2009 in the media, I agree with him that the pulpit should not have been used in this Aware saga.

I regret that this matter has caused concern and unhappiness. My actions on the pulpit have aroused some tension in this saga.

I now stand corrected.

I undertake to be more sensitive to similar situations in the future.


- Senior Pastor Derek Hong


Tolerance and restraint needed: DPM Wong

'I welcome the statement by Dr John Chew, President of the National Council of Churches of Singapore.

'In our compact multi-ethnic and multi-religious society, racial and religious harmony underpins our stability. One of the key rules of engagement, therefore, is the need for tolerance and restraint by all groups. This is the only practical way, for all groups, regardless of their size or material influence, to enjoy maximum space to pursue their different faiths in peace.

'I thank the NCCS for its statement which soberly reminds us of this reality. It makes clear the Council's responsible stand. It will help prevent any misunderstanding that the churches are backing one side in the Aware dispute, or that this is a dispute between Christians and other Singaporeans.'

- Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng


PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE?

7 MAR 1986:

These milestone changes in gender issues were effected in part due to Aware's work in advocacy and research.

1989:

Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore develops new guidelines to curb gender discrimination in advertisements

1994:

MOE stops requiring girls to take home economics and boys to take technical studies, offers 'Life Skill for Boys and Girls' instead.

1996:

Women's Charter revised to provide more protection for victims of domestic violence.

1999:

Women allowed to sponsor foreign spouses for citizenship and permanent resident status.

2003:

NUS lifts quota restricting the intake of female students into its medical faculty.

2004:

Government acknowledges men and women play equal roles as joint heads of household.

2005

Same citizenship rights are accorded to the children of Singaporean women, as those of Singaporean men.

28 Mar 2009:

At AGM, nine of 12 available exco positions go to new members, most of whom had joined Aware only in the last six months.

8 Apr 2009:

President Claire Nazar resigns.

14 Apr 2009:

160 old guard members call EGM for vote of no confidence in new exco.

15 Apr 2009

DBS bank executive Josie Lau elected president, although her employer expressed reservations about her taking the post.

Click to see larger image

18 Apr 2009

Adviser to the exco Constance Singam resigns.

23 Apr 2009

New guard holds press conference, accuses old guard of promoting homosexuality. Centre manager Schutz Lee fired for alleged 'acts of insubordination'.

30 Apr 2009:

Umbrella Christian body (National Council of Churches of Singapore) says churches should stay out of the fray.

Today:

EGM from 2pm at Suntec City Exhibition Hall 402. Registration begins at noon.


WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN TODAY

1 Vote of no confidence fails. New guard stays.

New exco introduces new programmes, including mentoring for younger women by successful role models.

It might also announce changes to Aware's schools sexuality programme.

2 Vote of no confidence succeeds. New exco comprises mixture of old and new guard members.

As each exco member is chosen by popular vote, each post in new exco will be up for grabs. Old and new guard members might face challenge of mending broken bridges.

3 Vote of no confidence succeeds. New exco comprises entirely of old guard members.

Aware returns to the way it was before the saga - all-inclusive. It might have to work on repairing reputation in the eyes of the pubic.

4 Vote of no confidence not mooted.

The new guard manages to address and satisfy old guard's concerns, and both sides reach a compromise. The new exco stays, and works together with the old guard in matters of Aware's agenda and programmes.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.89

THE AWARE SAGA: Three weeks in hot seat

May 3, 2009
THE AWARE SAGA
Three weeks in hot seat
She joined Aware to make a 'quiet contribution' but her term as president was anything but quiet
By Sumiko Tan, Sunday Times Editor
Ms Josie Lau sharing an intimate moment with her husband, DrAlan Chin, after she and her executive committee stepped down late last night. -- ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA
SHE did not join Aware to be its president, but as things turned out, she had to step into the hot seat. And hot it definitely was. In her brief 17 days as chief, she received death threats, was publicly rebuked by her employer and was subjected to Internet abuse calling her a liar and a puppet - to quote some of the tamer labels.

On Saturday night DBS Bank vice-president Josie Lau and the six remaining members of her five-week-old executive committee bowed out after losing a vote of no confidence at the Aware extraordinary general meeting.

They handed back the leadership of Aware to the veterans who founded and ran the women's advocacy group for 25 years before the newcomers seized the reins in March. I met Ms Lau at the Four Seasons lounge last Wednesday, before Saturday's dramatic turn of events.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.87


AWARE SHOWDOWN: 'Mentor' reacts to jibes

May 3, 2009
AWARE SHOWDOWN
'Mentor' reacts to jibes
By Sandra Davie, Senior Writer
Dr Thio Su Mien addressing the crowd at Suntec on Saturday. Amid loud boos and jeering, she held up a 2007 book Aware had published on the women's movement here and said she felt 'very charmed' to have been mentioned in it. -- ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA
SENIOR lawyer Thio Su Mien stood up to respond to the jibes on why she had declared herself the 'feminist mentor' of the women who seized control of the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) in March.

She had called herself that when she revealed on April 23 her key role in bringing about Aware's sudden leadership change.

VIDEO

Dr Thio, Ms Josie Lau and five others on the executive committee booted out on Saturday all attend the Anglican Church of Our Saviour in Margaret Drive.

On Saturday, amid loud boos and objections, she held up a 2007 book that Aware had published on the women's movement here and pointed out that she was mentioned as the first woman dean of the Law Faculty - from 1969 to 1971 - at the then-University of Singapore. Holding up the book, she said she felt 'very charmed' to have been included.

As the booing and jeering continued, Dr Thio told the crowd: 'Show some respect to your elders.' Someone in the audience responded: 'You have to earn respect.'

Dr Thio had sent out e-mail messages encouraging women to join Aware and change it, but she maintained on Saturday it was no 'covert operation'.

Old guard leaders had said that most of the people who came to the March 28 annual general meeting were unknown new faces, and they voted solidly for unknown new faces who took over without saying who they were, or why they were in Aware.

But Dr Thio on Saturday accused long-time members of having fallen asleep. 'You were not interested in your organisation...So don't blame others...don't blame other people. You are not interested. You are not interested!'

She wanted to continue, but she was drowned out by chants of 'Your three minutes are up, three minutes, three minutes.'

Later, she told The Sunday Times she was surprised by the 'anger' and 'vehemence' she felt from the Aware members. 'It's very scary,' she said. 'What is happening to women in Singapore?'


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.86

AWARE SHOWDOWN: New guard ousted

May 3, 2009
AWARE SHOWDOWN
New guard ousted

Exco of women's group steps down after raucous seven-hour meeting and control goes back to the veterans

By Wong Kim Hoh, Senior Writer
Outgoing exco members (from left) Charlotte Wong, Maureen Ong, Sally Ang, president Josie Lau and Lois Ng return on stage to announce their resignation. 'We have decided to graciously step down. We wish Aware all the best,' said Ms Lau. While her team was in a room deliberating its options, the members decided to hold their own elections and voted in a new slate of office bearers. -- ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA
THEY came to reclaim what they had lost, and they did. In a big show of solidarity, stalwarts of the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) and their supporters turned up in force and won it back.

Nearly 3,000 people attended an extraordinary general meeting and over nearly seven action-packed hours, blasted away at the team of unknowns which snatched the Aware leadership on March 28. Then they voted resoundingly to oust the team led by DBS Bank vice-president Josie Lau and inspired by senior lawyer Thio Su Mien. The final tally that they should go: 1,414 to 761.

VIDEO

Even then, Ms Lau and her team did not step down immediately. They consulted their lawyer, ignored calls to resign, then were told they could retire for five minutes to decide.

When they did not return, the meeting elected a new executive committee headed by former president Dana Lam. It was half an hour before Ms Lau and her exco reappeared to say that they had decided to step down.

Saturday's meeting at Suntec City Hall 402 drew Aware founders, past presidents and long-time members, as well as many women who joined only in recent weeks.

Many said they had been moved by the tumultuous events since March 28, when a team of new members seized nine of the 12 positions on the exco.

New president Claire Nazar quit 11 days later, to be succeeded by Ms Lau. It then emerged that several of the new leaders attended the Anglican Church of Our Saviour, and were strongly against homosexuality.

Then, Dr Thio revealed that she had encouraged the women to join and change Aware because she felt it was promoting lesbianism and homosexuality. In particular, she attacked an Aware sexuality programme for schools, saying it too promoted homosexuality. She called herself a 'feminist mentor'.

Over the past five weeks, the Aware exco shrank from 12 to eight as members resigned. There were only seven present yesterday, as the eighth, Ms Peggy Leong, did not attend.

Saturday's marathon meeting, which started at 2.30pm, was dominated by Aware stalwarts and their supporters, who criticised the newcomers and Dr Thio for the way they took over the association, disregarded older members and sacked staff. They also criticised the team's lack of diversity.

Ms Lau's team had several hundred supporters at the meeting, but mostly the sparring was done between the audience and the exco, and Dr Thio. There were some tense moments at the start of the meeting, when Nominated Member of Parliament Siew Kum Hong was told to sit with the men and expatriates in one side of the hall. He refused, saying that he was there as a legal adviser for the old guard.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.85

Positive ending to a semi-revolution at Suntec City

Positive ending to a semi-revolution at Suntec City

SINGAPORE - What the whole of Singapore witnessed at the Suntec City was people’s power, women’s power to be exact.

From the very start, Miss Josie Lau’s campaign was doomed for failure. She and the members of her team were met with strong boos and catcalls at every turn. They tried to speak, only to be drowned out by a chorus of noises. This prompted observers to question if we are really witnessing democracy in action. This is a valid point nonetheless. The basic tenet of a democracy is that anyone harboring a particular viewpoint should be given the right to express his or her opinion.

However, the converse can be argued that this event is somewhat like a semi-revolution in which the people’s power was in full demonstration. Semi because it wasn’t about taking to the streets waving placards and violent (physical) struggles, and a revolution because the ‘citizens’ of AWARE rallied together in a rare show of power to kick out their ‘government’. The sentiments were pretty obvious, 65% placed a vote of no confidence in Miss Lau’s leadership.

Despite the negative sentiments, Miss Lau did not crumble under pressure. Save for Miss Sally Ang’s “Shut up and sit down” hiccup, her team coped decently with the proceedings even though much of it went against them. In spite of the negativities behind her actions in orchestrating the initial takeover of AWARE followed by the alienation of the old guards, Miss Lau definitely deserves the credit for her high Adversity Quotient (AQ). Not many people can maintain a dignified demeanor in a high pressure cauldron like this, and Miss Lau has passed the test in this aspect with flying colors.

The old guards have a part to play in this positive ending too. Despite their differences, they rallied the audience in a round of applause to Miss Lau and company. And Miss Lau to her credit has stated that she will make use of her marketing and fund raising expertise to continue contributing at AWARE.

Now, normality has resumed at AWARE with a familiar leadership at the helm. There are still issues for the newest exco to handle, and one of which is the settlement of the huge expenditure incurred by the previous leadership under Miss Lau. Maybe, it is time for Miss Lau to start putting her marketing and fund raising expertise to good use!

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.173

New Aware exco of fresh and old faces vows safeguards

New Aware exco of fresh and old faces vows safeguards

Weekend • May 3, 2009

Loh Chee Kong
cheekong@mediacorp.com.sg


THE Association of Women for Action and Research has a new leadership team again, after a

landslide no-confidence vote on Saturday night saw the one-month-old executive committee

finally agree to step down - though not without a fight.

And the new team appointed at the extraordinary general meeting (EGM), a marathon six-hour

session attended by 3,000 members, immediately announced steps to prevent another March 28-

style takeover of the advocacy group.

“Its important to put some measures in our Constitution to make sure that something like this

doesnt happen again,” writer Dana Lam, a past president of Aware who made her return to the

top position, told reporters.

Specifically, the new team will be looking at enacting more stringent criteria for members

seeking posts on the Exco, including the requirement for candidates to have served at least

one year as a volunteer on a subcommittee.

In fact, Ms Lam revealed, such changes were already discussed prior to the leadership grab at

Aware's annual general meeting in March, but they “were not put into effect in time”.

The EGM, due to start at 2pm, was delayed by 40 minutes due to the huge crowd which turned up,

with many having signed up as members in recent days and more registering on the spot.

“We heard and read a lot in the press. So weve come to see, hear and feel for ourselves,”

said Ms Irene Low, a corporate trainer.

The meeting showed up the good and bad sides of both factions, with constant heckling and

booing of speakers - notably, against self-proclaimed “feminist mentor” Thio Su Mien - while

there were cheers for members who made heartfelt pleas for level heads.

The vote of no-confidence saw some 1,400 members calling for the incumbent Exco led by Ms Josie Lau to step down, with about 750 voting the other way.

Despite Ms Laus protestations that her Exco was not bound by the Aware constitution to step

down, they finally agreed to resign at about 9.15pm under severe pressure, more than an hour

after the vote results.

Elections for the new leadership then followed immediately.

While elated with the conclusion to what has been a “traumatic” period, Ms Lam concedes that

hard work lies ahead for the group - not least repairing the damage done by the internal

strife.

She said: “The biggest challenge is to restore confidence within Aware and outside. We will

have a lot of work to do to reassure our supporters, members and staff that things are not

just the same, that we are moving forward.”

The new Exco line-up sees the return of several Old Guards to the helm: Ms Chew I-Jin as vice

-president; Ms Corrinna Lim as assistant honorary secretary; Ms Tan Joo Hym as honorary treasurer; and Ms Margaret Thomas as a member.

Half the 12-women team were new faces, including fresh graduate Joanna D'Cruz, doctorate

student Martha Lee and new media practitioner, Hafizah Osman.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.102

AWARE: a case study in respect

AWARE: a case study in respect

If I were to use the name of one music act to describe the controversial AWARE saga that thankfully came to a satisfying 7-hour conclusion a few hours ago, it would be that of UK electronic-punksters: Does It Offend You, Yeah?

About 3,000 Singaporeans were sufficiently outraged enough to turn up at AWARE’s EGM (Extraordinary General Meeting) yesterday at the Suntec Convention Centre. Most of them were new members who had just signed up in the past month, as the number of AWARE members surged from 300 in April to an all-high at 3,000 yesterday.

1,411 women voted in favour of no confidence in the new exco, while 761 voted against it. In between casting the vote in a ballot and waiting for the results to be out, many poured themselves into queues, each waiting patiently to speak at the microphone, many of them articulate, some emotional, some hurt, and some who wondered out loud. It was, as they call it, a landslide victory for the AWARE establishment. “This is a win for civil society,” said Constance Singam.

So, with that, two months after the now infamous Mar 28’s AGM (Annual General Meeting) that marked AWARE’s first harrowing tumble in its 24-year history with the new exco, order was restored. The voices of the people were heard. AWARE now returns to its rightful, trusted hands.
Everyone has read about the unceremonious treatment that the new exco extended to the AWARE veterans: unwarranted firings, installation of new locks and surveillance cameras and several resignations from old committee members.

But what drove the final stake into the heart of the new exco yesterday was its talk-down behaviour and patronising tone that masterfully exemplified to the very audience it sought to serve, just how thoroughly incapable it was of showing respect to the women of Singapore.

As a hall of unhappiness greeted them, the new exco grabbed on tightly like clams in a storm with their Rajah & Tann legal advisors. Assistant honorary treasurer Sally Ang bluntly told founding AWARE member Margaret Thomas to shut her trap; honorary treasurer Maureen Ong hung on to the umbrella defence of “May we have some legal advice?” to sometimes seemingly straightforward questions; while president Josie Lau ordered security guards to remove photographers and jeerers. At one classic point, a member posed Josie Lau a question but the latter steadfastly looked down at the desk. Her lack of response signified that she was not listening.

And what was the members’ response? One noted the irony of Sally Ang’s ferocious “Shut up and sit down” command to Margaret Thomas: “I heard that [phrase] all my life… I feel very sad to come to a woman’s organisation where its president tells us to shut up and sit down.” Another member gleefully stated that she was pro-choice (choice being a major bugbear for the new exco, who were seen to be pushy and have an anti-gay agenda) to the loud applause of the crowd.

When ‘feminist mentor’ Dr Thio Su Mien was overwhelmed by boos from the crowd, her words were served curdlingly cold: “Show some respect to your elders.” And when the new exco were faced to numerous real questions, they seemed lost, repeatedly uttered "Let us have the right of reply", but had no real answers.

As one member observed aloud, does the new exco have any passion in what they do?

Furthermore, they have admitted to spending an estimated $90,000 in just one month alone, when $20,000 is the monthly cap according to the constitution. This money could have been channelled towards much better use, such as its programmes and operations. This financial fix is another illustration of just little the new exco understood of the workings of an NGO: that it thrives on strong community bonds. It forgot, or maybe simply cast a blind spot towards the fact that a real community exists beyond its one small entity — one that might have seen very willing and resourceful supporters come forward to extend their help free of charge or at a very nominal fee.

Truth be told, it cannot be easy sitting as one of the new exco members. You need sheer guts to face a hall full of reasonably guarded individuals who have already more or less made up their minds about you. But knowing when to stop, and stepping down respectfully when starting is a misguided move, versus stepping down when you are forced to as a last resort — that makes a world of difference (extra demerit points for pulling out the plug to the microphones at that). And for that alone, the new exco members may just be a bit too late.

Even as the old AWARE team graciously tried to salvage a bit of their dignity by calling for a round of applause as they departed, they have lost their case for respect in a “court of opinion” — ironically too, since they hardly seemed to have any for its members.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.33

Josie Lau's exco resigned 'for the sake of Aware'

Josie Lau's exco resigned 'for the sake of Aware'

Weekend • May 3, 2009

Alicia Wong
alicia@mediacorp.com.sg

They decided to "graciously resign" from the exco although they were not legally bound to do

so, said the Aware exco which lost a no-confidence vote at its Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) on Saturday.

"We need not step down, but we considered it and came to the conclusion that for the sake of

Aware, we would step down," said Ms Maureen Ong who had been the honorary treasurer of the

Association of Women for Action and Research.

Even so, at a late-night press conference held after the EGM, some of the just-ousted exco

members raised concerns over Aware's future.

Based on the “expressions of thoughts” at the EGM, said outgoing honorary secretary Jenica

Chua, she wondered if Awares suddenly-expanded membership was an accurate representation of

women in Singapore.

After all as a women's advocacy group, she pointed out, Aware was a “very strong vehicle” in

pushing for womens interests and rights, for instance, by providing feedback to the United

Nations.

The outgoing exco's own ability to lead had earlier questioned at the EGM, and in response to

such criticism they cited members' experience in civil society work, telling the press they

did not "see how we're not equipped to run the exco".

An upset Ms Ong also felt there was “room for improvement” in Awares corporate governance and accounting.

"The legal position is very clear. We need not step down, but we considered it and came to the

conclusion that for the sake of Aware, we would step down," said Ms Ong.

Wishing the new exco "all the best," Aware president of less than two months Josie Lau said

she hopes Aware will return to its original roots in accordance to its constitution and

continue to contribute to the advancement of women.

Ms Lau, who said she would "reflect" on this expericence before deciding if she would run for

office again, responded to criticism over the $90,000 spent in the past month under her watch,

of which some $23,000 went to renting the exhibition halls at the Suntec convention centre for

Saturday's meeting.

Ms Lau said: "I am sure we are very above board in those expenditures, given the circumstances

surrounding events in the last few days. We had to spend what was spent."

Going forward, Ms Charlotte Wong Hock Soon, who stepped down as vice-president, said she would be happy to contribute to Aware in the area of education if invited to do so by the newly

elected exco.

Ms Wong is a former sociology lecturer at the National University of Singapore.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.101

The Aware EGM: A blow-by-blow account

The Aware EGM: A blow-by-blow account

Weekend • May 3, 2009

Loh Chee Kong
Alicia Wong
cheekong@mediacorp.com.sg

12pm: Queues begin to form, with Aware's membership having swelled to more than 1,800 in recent days as extensive media reports on the leadership controversy sparked interest.The night before, organisers booked an adjacent hall to accommodate the anticipated crowd. By 1.30pm, the queues snake along two levels of the Suntec Convention Centre.

One corporate trainer in her 50s says she feels the New Guard should be given a chance to prove themselves. But undergraduate Kishan Kumar Singh thinks the old guardis more inclusive approach should be the way forward. “The issue affects more than just women ... its a larger societal issue,” says Mr Singh.

Mild argument breaks out between ushers and sections of the crowd, after the latter are told by an unidentified personnel to cut the queue and head straight to the registration booth - only to be turned away.

2.40pm: The EGM starts after a 40-minute delay. The crowd, by some estimates,has hit 3,000. Incumbent Aware president Josie Lau begins her speech but is interrupted repeatedly the audience. She calls for security to “escort” the unruly out. Photographers are also asked to leave as some are using their flashes - against the house rules, according to the Exco.

3pm: Disgruntled members begin to make their presence felt as they take to the microphones to voice their impatience: They want Ms Lau to go straight to the fourth item on the agenda: The vote of no-confidence.

A shouting match erupts between the Exco and members, after assistant honorary treasurer Sally Ang tells the crowd to "shut up and sit down". Loud boos ring across the hall.

Succumbing to crowd pressure, Ms Lau agrees to skip the first two administrative items on the agenda and call for the meeting to vote on a no-confidence motion - but not before she asks Rajah & Tann lawyer Gregory Vijayendran to spell out that the constitution does not explicitly provide for such a motion, and that it could be challenged in court.

The lawyer adds, nevertheless: “Whilst a vote of no confidence does not mean the new Exco has to step down, they should consider doing so."

Members are briefed on voting procedure. A new member interrupts the proceedings by criticising the new guard for trying to take credit for the spike in membership. This sets off another shouting match.

The roused crowd chants "Where were you", when immediate past president Constance Singam asks where the new Exco members were in the last 24 years. Feminist mentor Thio Su Mien takes the microphone and rattles off her achievements to "establish credibility”. “I know you all don't like the term feminist mentor,” she says, urging them to nevertheless “show respect" to elders.

4.30pm: Ballots for the no-confidence motion are cast. Afterwards, while the votes are being counted, the Exco goes on to discuss proposed constitutional amendments. After protests from members that some of them have not even seen the proposals, the Exco proposes a 10-minute break so that members can obtain copies to read through.

Members continue to question the Exco on various matters, including the decisions to sack Ms Schutz Lee - Aware's former centre manager - and to install CCTVs at the associations Dover Crescent premises.

Attention turns to the cost of booking the venue for the EGM. Honorary treasurer Maureen Ong reveals Aware spent $23,000 - enraging several in the crowd who are vocal in their displeasure on the excessive use of funds.

One member points out that under the group's constitution, the Exco has to seek members' approval to spend more than $20,000 in a month. When she becomes agitated, she is escorted out of the hall by security officers.

Upon further questioning, Ms Ong says the Exco has spent $90,000 in the past month, mostly on organising the EGM. The crowd lets out an audible gasp. ”We had to find a venue to accommodate all members,” Ms Ong explains.

7pm: The crowd, getting restless, i told the results will be out soon. Meanwhile, the censure of the Exco continues. A new member who introduces herself as Irene Ho takes issue with being told to sit and be quiet. She loudly declares, to some cheers from the crowd: “Today is the time to stand up and speak up, not shut up and sit down."

The members start to question the Exco's decision to sack Ms Braema Mathi as chair of Aware's subcommittee on Cedaw (short for the United Nation's Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women).

The Exco try to explain how they dissolved the subcommittee “in line with the constitution”, and note that Ms Mathi hasd not submitted a draft shadow report owed despite repeated requests.Ms Mathi steps in to say she had offered to meet with the Exco, and that their comments are “significantly defamatory".

Other members involved in the Cedaw project voice their displeasure that the subcommittee was dissolved without their being informed. That's tantamount to being sacked without notice, they say.

One member says agitatedly: “You took away our choices, so are we wrong for screaming and shouting at you? How can I respect you if you are treating me as a child?”

8pm: There is a tense silence as Ms Lau reads out the ballot results. This gives way to ecstatic cheers, when it is revealed that the motion has recieved nearly twice the votes in favour as those against it. While Ms Lau keeps a straight face and tone, many members jump out of their seats and hug one another.

One member of the old guard takes the microphone and spells it out for the Exco: “You no longer have the moral authority to run Aware.” They are asked to step down graciously, or face motion to remove them.

Almost stiffly, Ms Lau says the Exco will speak to its legal counsel and consider. The crowd starts booing; Ms Mathi has to calm them down. Addressing the Exco, the Aware veteran stresses that “the conclusion is the conclusion”, even if the Exco have been “wonderful” in comporting themselves under flak throughout the afternoon.

Others join the call for the Exco to step down. Member Rose Tan says: “I feel sorry for all of you but you just don't have the experience and networks ... Everybody wants you to go, so please, just go.”

The Exco is given five minutes – until 8.40pm – to discuss their decision.

8.40 pm: The Exco, which has exited the hall, is a no-show and uncontactable.There are whispers that they may have made a quick escape. Ms Mathi announces: “By their action and conduct, I declare the current exco has indeed resigned."

Still, she gives them another 10 minutes - and when they fail to reappear, she goes ahead with the motion to remove the Exco. Only two hands in the entire hall are raised in objection.

By a show of hands, the election of the new Exco proceeds rapidly. Names are thrown up and seconded within a blink of an eye. Positions are filled within seconds. The noise level is growing as the crowd cheers for the new Exco, who one by one fill the stage.

9.15pm: Halfway through the proceedings, Ms Lau and her team finally turn up. They interrupt the elections, saying they want to make a statement.

The boos turn to cheers, when Ms Lau announces their decision to resign and wishes the new Aware leadership well. She hopes they will hit the Cedaw-set target of 30 to 35 per cent female representation in the country's political and social spheres – what appears an indirect retort to earlier suggestions that Ms Lau and her team did not understand Cedaw's work.

“I declare the meeting closed,” Ms Lau then says. The microphones are turned off, and as the old guard try to get them turned back on so the election can continue, they applaud the ousted exco for stepping down graciously.

The new exco is finally declared, and Ms Constance Singam, who is all smiles, is brought back as its advisor.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28274.100