Saturday, April 18, 2009

Ours is an ongoing narrative

Ours is an ongoing narrative

Weekend • April 18, 2009

Letter from Sabina-Leah Fernandez, Leigh Pasqual, Shivani Retnam, Tan Qiuyi

(Aware members and volunteers)

WE REFER to the comment, “Ladies, have you forgotten your narrative?” (April 13).

As Aware members and volunteers we were shocked by the planning and coordination behind the recent Executive Committee election.

It is always good to bring balance to any form of advocacy and any volunteer group — and we look forward to hearing new voices and new opinions, and debating issues in meetings to come. But while we’re thrilled that so many people are getting passionate and involved, we can’t help but ask: Why the secrecy? How long had this been in the works? What is the agenda?

Aware has done great work in its 20-odd years. Former NMP Kanwaljit Soin rallied in Parliament to change laws surrounding domestic violence, Aware presented the 2008 Cedaw shadow report to the United Nations, it runs programmes that educate women on financial independence, provides free legal advice and counselling to people in need, and actively campaigns against domestic abuse and marital rape.

The implication that over 20 years of work to remove discrimination against any gender or orientation has gone up in smoke is unfounded.

This exco takeover may have been a surprise, but it’s hardly the end.

Saleemah Ismail, president of Unifem Singapore, said: “Women today are standing on the shoulders of giants who came before us and waged wars in their time to make things better.” We tend to agree.

In Singapore, our giants are early parliamentarians like Sahora Ahmat, Chan Choy Siong and Seow Peck Leng, whose work on the legislative assembly led to the 1961 Women’s Charter, or founding members of Aware like Hedwig Anwar, Constance Singam, Kanwaljit Soin and Lena Lim. Nothing and no one can cancel out what these giants have done for women in Singapore.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27546.1

Searching for Singapore's soul (Part 2): A losing battle for our dialects

Searching for Singapore's soul (Part 2): A losing battle for our dialects

I am truly appalled by the recent speak Mandarin drive. It says two main things:

1. that dialects are a negative interference on the learning of English and Mandarin

2. that it is restrictive because it only confines us to our ancestral village, town, or at best the province.

And to compound the absurdity of this argument, the Straits Times published a letter in the forum by an Ong Siew Chey who said:

Chinese should forget about dialects and stick to mandarin. Language is a tool and we should use the best tool available. Cultural and other values can be dissociated from languages...we do not lose much if we discard dialects

These arguments are highly flawed.

Firstly, a person's ability to learn a language is not a zero-sum game. The government should give Singaporeans greater credit for their capacity to learn. Any doctor will tell you that we do not have a fixed number of brain cells for the learning of languages and should therefore conserve them for only the languages that matter. If anything, my learning of a second and third language helped me appreciate the different languages more.

Granted, with limited time, one may argue that we should be focusing on the languages that matter. But being able to speak a language well has less to do with the number of hours one spends STUDYING it, than with the person's opportunity to practice it and understand the cultural significance of the language.

Which brings me to my next point. How can a person say that: "Cultural and other values can be dissociated from languages"???!!! Language and Culture are intrinsically linked! Good heavens! Which planet is this person coming from?!

Chinese opera sung in Mandarin as opposed to Hokkien can NEVER be the same. There are idoms, terms and phrases used in Hokkien, Cantonese, Hakka etc that you cannot fully translate into Mandarin, and which are unique to the historical development of the dialect. You lose the dialect, and you lose the legends, myths and folklores of these communities.

Language is a tool, yes! But who ever said we should only work with one tool. Different tools are designed for different functions, so why rank them as best and second-best? And what's wrong with working with more than one tool?

Lastly, to say that dialects restrict us to only our ancestral town, or province is to have a very limited understanding of the function of language. Can and should we measure the value of a language based on the number of people who speak it? Must everything be valued by a quantifiable measure?

So what if only a village of 20 people speak that dialect? If one of that 20 is my grand father, that ONE person means a lot to me. And he is a part of my history and my family, which I will lose if I don't speak that dialect.

I speak from experience because my late grandparents were from Guang Zhou (a city in China), but I never learnt to speak cantonese. And I grew up very much detached from them, and I never bothered spending time with them because - "What would we talk about when I don't even speak their language?"

Nothing can be sadder than being total strangers with your own family and even when they passed on, I didn't really feel like I had lost a close family member.

Is this the kind of young generation the government really wants to nurture?

Dialects, like language, are a means of communication, and along with communication, peoples' ability to form relationships, identify with each other, and express feelings to each other. You take that away, and you break more than just the language, but the social bonds, sense of community and one's roots.

Did the government not once advocate Singaporean's living overseas to value one's roots and come back to Singapore instead of deserting? We were labeled "stayers" or "quitters".

Do our roots only stop at 1979 when the Speak Mandarin campaign was launched in Singapore?

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27266.2


Should we be searching for Singapore's soul?

I had just finished reading a book by Philip Pan, Out of Mao's Shadow: The struggle for the Soul of a New China.

The book started with a powerful presentation of the Tiananmen Massacre and a very stark contrast: before the communist revolution, the Nationalist party used water jets to quell student protests. But when the communist party came to power, they used guns and tanks in response to the students' demand for democratic reform and an end to corruption.

But what hit me harder, was the conclusion of the book, which I felt mirrored some of the issues we face here in Singapore. This is what he said in the concluding chapter:

The internet has emerged as an important venue for people with shared interests...to gather, talk and organise...The hard truth, however, is that many people aren't looking...[the communist party's] "patriotic education" classes in the schools have dulled the public's curiosity...the government has grown expert at manipulating public opinion, especially rallying nationalist sentiment to its side...The party's most important advantage, of course, is the wave of prosperity that it has been riding for more than a quarter century...the wealthiest and most influential tycoons...are the most likely to owe their wealth to the one-party system and the least likely to challenge it.

Indeed, this paragraph can be used to describe exactly Singapore. Singaporeans are very much plugged in to the world wide web, but yet to find people interested in discussing social issues in Singapore - the wrong attitudes we are having towards fertility and aging population problem, the importance of preserving our dialect as a fast disappearing link to our history and ancestry - is not so easy.

Indeed, from the western point of view business development is supposed to be good for democratic development. But the nature of business development in Asia is so different and they fail to understand that in a country where the private sector is nurtured by the state, the business community will be the last people to champion democratic reform.

A friend recently commented to me: "I'm less concerned with saving the world than saving my bank account". Indeed, the government has done a good job of setting the priorities for Singaporeans.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27266.1

Singapore Government’s Solution to Loansharks

Singapore Government’s Solution to Loansharks

Seriously, I wondered why are the people paying so much money to the tune of 1-2million/minister when they can’t even offer proper solutions. Oh. By the way, make a guess who took this picture. It was taken by a stomp reader. This plus last Sunday news paper where a journalist “manage” to sneak a exclusive peek into the shady world of Geylang makes me wonder… Are normal citizen better than the police in finding crooks? Maybe that is the reason why we can’t find Mas Selamat after so long.

Anyway, was wanting to post this up yesterday. Felt I just saw crap plastered all over ST yesterday. Anyway, for those who have read yesterday paper, it was on the front page on how our still can’t catch Mas Selamat Minister saying on loanshark and those chronic gambler who borrow from it.

Loanshark cases up

Seriously, I think the people are tired of minister sprouting nonsense here. Seems like the minister are trying to outdo each other, Health Minister with his “please send your useless elderly to JB” gaffe, Lui Tuck Yew and his “ internet is not an effective self regulated regime” gaffe and now, we have our high and mighty Mr. Wong saying we should catch those idiots who borrow from loansharks gaffe. I wonder what is the flavor next month? Maybe like half way through the year I’ll come up with a post on the darnest things our highly talented ministers said so we can better emulate them. Anyway, sorry for digressing. :)

Said Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng yesterday: 'This will hold borrowers accountable if their reckless borrowing or gambling habits endanger the safety and security of the community.'

I was speechless when I read this. Can he work some brain? Supply and demand my friend! If there is no one wanting to borrow money, you think the loanshark will stuff cash into you to ask you borrow from them? But I believe my highly talented minister see it from a different angle. This is what I think:

Our dear minister is sick of lesser mortal using the police to guard them against the loanshark. His message for lesser mortal like us is:”Please don’t disturb me with your problems. The government is not interested in solving it for you. We are a meritocratic society, if you have the talent, you solve the problem without the government help. If you can’t, it means you’re just lazy. GET OUT OF MY ELITE UNCARING FACE!”

He is so so sick of having his police force entertaining 4,000 police call regarding loanshark activities. Making so much loanshark call. How to properly go and catch that Mas “Houdini” Selamat?

So, realising that it’s always the borrower that calls the police for help… Highly talented minister got an idea. If I prevent the borrower from calling the police, I’ll cut police call by 4,000. Therefore, the solution was to penalise the borrower when they report to police. After a few public cases, borrowers will wisen up and not bugger the police anymore. Ta-da! Problem solved!

He can’t really be bothered if the borrower are protected. As long the loanshark don’t harass the government, all is peace. 井水不犯河水。 Afterall, his pay is pegged to the highest earner, not the lowest earner. Why content and bother with people who don’t determine how much he’ll get? Lesser mortal can only blame them self for not working/retrain hard enough and being such a lazy bum. The government is right not to provide welfare. Bloody lazy blood sucking lesser mortals!

Ok. Puns aside. The triad are doing their age old job. Providing services where the government fails to provide. If the people are being looked after by the government and is contented with what they have, you think who will still go and look for loanshark? And not all borrowers are gambling addicts. What a degrading stereotypical comments from the thou-holier-than-God men-in-white. To quote from the movie V for Vendetta:

How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

paying peanuts to keep monkeys!

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27265.1

New Aware head's job at DBS at risk

New Aware head's job at DBS at risk
After just one day, she faces flak from bank and Aware veteran members
By Benson Ang
April 18, 2009 Print Ready Email Article

ONE day into the presidency of a women's group and DBS bank officer Josie Lau Meng-Lee, 48, is feeling the heat of the seat.
Click to see larger image
FEELING THE HEAT: Ms Lau disregarded the bank's advice to not join Aware's executive committee. ST FILE PICTURE

Ms Lau, who was elected president of the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) late on Wednesday night, faces heat from her employers and questions from her Aware predecessors and members.

Ms Lau is DBS' vice-president and head of marketing, cards and unsecured loans.

Shortly after her Aware election, DBS issued a statement saying that although the bank supports her involvement as an Aware council member, it believes that the role of president would demand too much of her time and energy.

Yesterday, when it became clear that Ms Lau was president, DBS issued another statement - this time for her disregard of the bank's staff code of conduct twice.

The bank said it was reviewing the matter.

The first time was when she became an Aware committee member without informing the bank; the second when she ran for Aware president.

The heat from the other side comes from Aware members who told The New Paper that they were unhappy over comments made by the new committee on Wednesday night.

Ms Margaret Thomas, 57, a founding member of Aware, felt that the press statement did not address the key concerns of the 160 members who signed a requisition to the new committee.

It called for an immediate extraordinary general meeting to clear the air over the way the new members were elected on 28Mar.

It also voiced members' concerns that Ms Claire Nazar, who was initially elected president, resigned barely two weeks later.

Ms Thomas, a media consultant and a former Aware vice-president, listed the concerns: 'Who are they? What do they want?

'If they remember and honour the work of past Aware members, why did they see the need to come in those numbers, to come and take over the executive committee?

'What are they going to do that is so different from what is being done now, that they felt they had to gain control?'

She suggested that the new committee could have worked with, and alongside, the old guard.

'If you join Aware, we take it that you support our principles, our views, feel we're doing a good job and you want to participate.'

'The press release, if anything, just raises more questions.'

Even former Aware president Constance Singam, 72, who was to have sat in at the meeting of new committee as its adviser, was initially kept out.

She told The New Paper that when the meeting began, she was not allowed into the room. She just sat outside.

She said: 'They (the new committee) said they had to deal with some sensitive issues and didn't need my presence there.'

Ms Singam was there to ensure continuity between the old committee and new one.

Ms Lau is married to Dr Alan Chin Yew Liang, a medical doctor, and has two daughters, aged 17 and 15.

According to Ms Lau's CV, she is most concerned about work-life balance and the role of mothers as a stabilising factor in the family.

At press time, she could not be contacted for comment.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27264.1

AWARE: Demonstration Of Democracy

AWARE: Demonstration Of Democracy

The recent developments at AWARE have been most fascinating. To have an understanding about the official point of view and preference about what we're supposed to think, it's useful to refer to the Straits Times. Today's newspaper is full of stories about the negative aspects of the 'hostile takeover' as well as a negative portrayal of the new executive committee of the women's group. The unorthodox public scolding from the new President's boss DBS bank has also raised an eyebrow or two. Whether this is is just a good news story or whether this is a concerted effort to discredit the new team remains to be seen.

I believe that the new executive committee did nothing wrong per se to get elected. They followed the rules. They planned, they strategised, they got many people to attend the AGM, and they managed to get themselves voted in with their (and other unrelated people's) help. This is how one obtains power; any capable politician knows this.

Most of us are not aware that such a thing can be possible (as seen from the shock expressed by the existing members of the organisation). A change in leadership requires people to vote. Firstly, a lot of locals don't get to vote due to realities of electoral rules. (My father hasn't voted in parliamentary elections for 30 years, for example.) Second, when they do have a chance to vote, they should have some sort of expectation that they might be successful; that some things can, and might, be changed. Usually in this country, that doesn't happen (or at least change happens very slowly). That's one reason for the apathy of young people; they just don't believe that they can do anything to change things.

So, out of the blue, we have this AWARE snafu. A few people who did their homework, obeyed the rules and simply just showed up proved to the rest of the other members who chose to stay at home that change is indeed possible. It's not a mathematical, nor practical impossibility. But more than that, these people who planned the 'coup' at AWARE managed to do something far more psychologically significant. They demonstrated that it is possible to change the status quo, and to do it in just one AGM.

Now, this surely will result in a 'disturbance in the Force', a challenge to our existing paradigm. Do we sit on our lazy butts and wait for others to change things, or do we try to change some things ourselves? Now, one can carry this possibility into national elections, and the thought of it can be a little... disturbing, at least to some. Why might happen if more people thought that it is possible to enact change by voting? This might explain the current backlash against the new executive committee in the official press.

On a different note, I guess this development might be the beginning of the emergence of the right wingers I wrote about 4 years ago. This country cannot really afford this sort of thing, and I'm comforted that the man upstairs probably doesn't want it to happen too. There seems to be an EOGM next month. May the Force be with them...

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27250.1

Ong Seh Hong: It was a staff loan

It was a staff loan

Weekend • April 18, 2009

Dr Ong Seh Hong,

MP for Marine Parade GRC

IN THE on-going trial of Reverend Ming Yi, my name was mentioned in relation to a loan made to me when I joined Ren Ci Hospital and Medicare Centre as a staff. I am writing to state the facts of the loan and the events leading to it.

I had an outstanding staff housing loan from my previous employer, the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) in 1999. I was offered a job by Ren Ci Hospital and Medicare Centre to be Director, Medical and Paramedical Services in January 2000. This was before I was elected as an MP in October 2001.

To join Ren Ci, I had to settle my housing loan with the GIC. One of the conditions for accepting the job in Ren Ci was that Ren Ci was to grant me a loan of $60,000 as a staff loan, to pay off in part the outstanding loan I owed to GIC.

I repaid the sum of $60,000 within three years by December 2002 as per the terms on which the loan was given to me.

When I borrowed the sum of $60,000 from Ren Ci, I was not an MP. Ren Ciextended the loan to me as a staff.

These are the facts surrounding the staff loan extended to me as an employee of Ren Ci Hospital.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27249.1

What about the MD who’s also an MP?

What about the MD who’s also an MP?

Weekend • April 18, 2009

Letter from Peter Tan

MR CONRAD Raj in “What’s good for the goose” (April 17) brings up valid points about DBS’ handling of Ms Josie Lau’s appointment as president of Aware.

While the examples that Mr Rajcites are mostly non-executive members of the DBS Board, within the management of DBS is a managing director who is also a Member of Parliament. Surely both these roles come with heavy responsibilities, including the need to attend Parliament sessions during office hours.

Might it not be better for DBS to trust that senior management (including VPs) will do the right thing and ensure that whatever activities or membership they have outside of work will not affect their responsibilities at DBS or damage the bank’s reputation?

Demanding that senior management seek prior approval for what they do on their own time seems unnecessarily heavy-handed and belittles the trust the bank has in its management. Even if there is a need for prior approval, DBS should still clarify why it feels one employee can be both MD and MP butMs Lau cannot be VP and head of Aware.

By not doing so, it will be easy for people to accuse the bank of practising double standards.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27248.1


Not feasible for docs to report every food poisoning case

Not feasible for docs to report every food poisoning case

By Dr Albert Lin

I refer to the proposal by Mr Gerald Giam to implement an Integrated Food Contamination Reporting System in his letter to the Straits Times Forum on 16 April 2009. (read letter here)

Mr Giam wrote that a web-based interface for doctors to report all cases of food poisoning they treat will enable MOH to track outbreaks earlier and faster.

While the concept behind his idea is sound, it is not feasible to implement it on the ground. As a resident physician at the emergency department, I see an average of 10 to 20 cases of gastroenteritis (food poisoning) per shift. Gastroenteritis also form 20 to 30% of the cases seen by GPs.

Given the time constraints doctors face in the course of their work, it is almost impossible for them to take a detailed clinical history to find out what the suspected food was and the stall from the food was taken, let alone to report all cases.

Besides, not all cases of gastroenteritis are caused by food poisoning. It can be due to gastric flu, side effects from common medicines like antibiotics or simply a prodrome of other diseases. All viral infections have the potential to cause diarrhoea including dengue fever and hand-foot-mouth disease.

Hence, the surveillance system mooted by Mr Giam will not work and will be a drain on precious manpower and resources.

The current MOH system of surveillance and reporting of mass food poisoning cases is adequate to deal with most outbreaks.

In the case of the Geylang Serai outbreak, there appears to be delay of 3 days for the first reports of food poisoning from the Indian Rojak stall to surface because there is usually an incubation period of between 24 and 72 hours before the symptoms first appear. It is highly unlikely that the cases are picked up within 24 hours.

While the system may not be able to detect small number of cases, a higher than average number of gastroenteritis will raise suspicions amongst doctors of a possible outbreak.

Under the Infectious Disease Act (CAP 137), all medical doctors are required by law to notify MOH of a list of infectious diseases they diagnose in their clinics through the online CDLENS portal (https://www.cdlens.moh.gov.sg).

Some of the more common notifiable diseases on the list are dengue fever, hand, food and mouth disease, tuberculosis, Salmonellosis, gonorrhoea and genital herpes. Gastroenteritis is a symptom and not a disease which explains its exclusion from the list.

Doctors are also kept updated on the latest epidemics in the world and Singapore. Urgent notifications are sent immediately via SMSes.

Nevertheless, more can be done to get GPs on board the system as most of them do not have PCs or laptops in their clinics.

I would recommend Mr Giam and all readers to visit the MOH website (www.moh.gov.sg) regularly for updates on the food poisoning incident as well as other health-related matters.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27027.2

DBS publicly criticises AWARE's new Head

DBS publicly criticises AWARE's new Head

DBS is doing more damage to themselves by releasing press releases voicing their unhappiness over Ms Josie Lau's new position in AWARE.

Yes, Josie may have disregarded staff conduct but as one of the biggest employer in Singapore, DBS should not have publicly criticized her. In fact, they should have communicated with her through proper internal staff communication system not in the papers!

As commented by a report in 'TODAY', it is very rare for a private sector employer to express disagreement about its employee’s voluntary commitments. I have no right and is not going to touch on how wrong or right that staff policy is, however, I thought its very wrong of the company to publicly express their displeasure over a staff. This should have been kept a private issue.

I must say that my previous as well as current employer had never doubted my ability to complete my job and had never interfere or question me with regards to my appointment in WP. Credit goes to them for that...

Lastly, why is it that we are only thinking of the negative that this new leadership in AWARE is up to no good? Guilty before proven or rather they have to prove that they are innocent otherwise they are guilty! Sounds a bit like ISD isn't?

Its simply too early to judge.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27246.2

When the employer drops by

When the employer drops by

Very rarely does a private sector employer comment publicly about what its employee does in his or her personal time. It is even rarer for a private sector employer to express disagreement about its employee’s voluntary commitments.

DBS did both when it came out to express its view on the personal and voluntary work of its vice-president of credit cards, Josie Lau, who was appointed this week the new president of the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware).

Employers generally restrain themselves not because it may come across as downright unprofessional but for other sound reasons. As indicated by DBS’ statement on Wednesday, in which it said the bank requires all employees to obtain approval before running for or taking on an external appointment, most employers have internal policies about such matters.

An internal policy usually allows an employee to do most things with his or her personal time so long as these do not create a real or an apparent conflict of interest by interfering with officially assigned duties.

A 1993 study, ‘The employer as social arbiter: Considerations in limiting involvement in off-the-job behaviour’, by the School of Labour and Industrial Relations at Michigan State University encouraged an employer “to act conservatively in invoking mandatory policies that affect employees’ personal lives unless there is a clear individual employee performance problem or the personal behaviour imposes harm on employees or customers”.

Such internal policies tend to encourage employees to consult their immediate supervisors when in doubt about their out-of-office activities. Legal advice can be sought from relevant counsel where necessary.

In the financial sector, there are governance requirements that require employees to disclose their activities or sources of income outside work on a regular basis.

Employees are often trusted to act in a manner not prejudicial to the interests and reputation of their employers. For example, some years ago, I was involved in a constitutional matter outside work. I knew that my then employer, a cooperative of the National Trades Union Congress, would not tolerate my participation in opposition party activities, as the NTUC unwaveringly backs the governing party.

But certain individuals alleged that I was helping an opposition party. Questions about such involvement naturally flowed from my bosses. It turned out I had in fact helped a politician from the ruling party.

To the credit of my former employer, I was never questioned about my personal activities again. I would like to think my actions had assured them that I had their interests and reputation at heart.

Similarly, cases such as Ms Lau’s are usually privately dealt with by well-oiled internal checks and before they become a public relations nightmare. Thus, when Sylvia Lim of Temasek Polytechnic or Brandon Siow of Singapore Airlines Cargo joined the Workers’ Party before the last elections, no equivalent performance concerns were raised by their employers.

What then are the options available to Ms Lau, now that her employer has said its piece? She can prepare for a baptism of fire. Her employer will scrutinise her more closely to ensure her Aware presidency does not affect her performance at work.

By ignoring DBS’ advice, she appears to have signalled that her presidency at Aware is more important than her work at DBS.

One of my personal advisers best summarised my position when I was subject to unusual scrutiny as such: “You should ask yourself if the values of your organisation complement your own values. If they don’t, the honourable thing for you to do is to resign.” Indeed, if Ms Lau is not prepared to rough it out or finds her personal values diverging from that of DBS, she should leave the bank.

The easy way, of course, is for her to conduct herself like nothing has happened. Arguably, some may submit this is a foolish thing to do.

Over time, however, this incident may pass. But it may be opportune for employers to review their guidelines for the personal activities of their employees. It may also be a good time to revisit one’s personal closets, just in case the employer drops by.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27246.1

All the hype about nothing

All the hype about nothing

Not exactly nothing, but about 400 women in Aware. That is all the members in the association and the whole country is aroused. The main media went to town with something like 6 pages devoted to the association and recent happenings after non stop daily reportings of the grab for power. And even DBS has to come out in public to rebuke its senior staff for the gumption to accept the appointment as the President of the association.

It is only an association of women for god sake, not an association of witches and vampires that could turn the country upside down or cast a spell on anyone that is considered enemy. Have we gone overboard over a none issue?

Oops, sorry ladies, it is big issue.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27243.1

NEA’s CEO reveals that Geylang Serai market is run by PAP Kampong Ubi CCC!!

NEA’s CEO reveals that Geylang Serai market is run by PAP Kampong Ubi CCC!!

After keeping the news under wraps for almost 3 weeks, NEA CEO Andrew Tan has finally let the cat out of the bag over the background of the Geylang Serai Market: it is built and managed by a PAP grassroots organization - Kampong Ubi Citizens Consultative Committee (CCC)!!

In a letter sent to the media, Mr Andrew Tan wrote:

“When markets and hawker centres are being upgraded, grassroot organisations and their advisers can choose to have a temporary market which is not provided for under the Government’s Hawker Centres Upgrading Programme.

If so, they also carry the responsibility of keeping the temporary market clean to meet NEA standards. However, NEA will intervene if it assesses the need to do so in the interest of public health.

In the case of Geylang Serai Market, the Kampong Ubi CCC decided to build and manage the temporary market. Despite the best of efforts put in by the Temporary Market Management Committee in implementing its cleaning regime and in tackling the rat infestation problem, the problem had persisted.”

I believe Mr Tan is trying to be diplomatic here so as not to offend the PAP.

The market management committee has been “managing” the market for 3 years. How can they fail to eradicate the rats which is easily accomplished by pest controllers in less than a week!

If this represents the “best” effort put in by the Kampong CCC, then I really worry about the other temporary markets which are run by these grassroots organizations.

The market management committee is guilty of negligence on at least three counts:

1. Failure to tackle the chronic rat problem.

2. Failure to call for spring-cleaning of the market when it should be done every four months.

3. Failure to maintain general cleanliness and environmental hygiene of the premises.

Why didn’t NEA take action against the management committee earlier since it claimed its officers conduct spot checks on temporary markets pretty often?

Who in the management committee should answer for the lapses of hygiene at the temporary market?

From what know, the management committee reports directly to its advisor PAP MP Dr Ong Seh Hong.

Is Dr Ong aware of the chronic hygiene problems in the Geylang Serai temporary market which is located in this ward? He should have detected the problem himself had he been conducting his walk-abouts in his constituency frequently.

It is most unfair and unjust that MOH and NEA found fit to haul the Indian Rojak stallholder to court on shaky grounds of “lapses in food and environmental hygiene” while they dare not even censure Kampong Ubi CCC and its advisor for failure to maintain the cleanliness and hygiene of the temporary market.

Each individual hawker at the Geylang Serai temporary market is in charge of only the food and environmental hygiene at their respect stalls.

Ultimately, the management committee is in charge of the overall cleanliness of the place. Cleaning of the premises as well as removing offending pests such as rats lies within the purview of the committee.

I sincerely implore NEA to prosecute the management committee of the Geylang Serai temporary market including its advisor PAP MP Dr Ong Seh Hong for dereliction of duties and gross negligence leading to castastrophic lapses in food and environmental hygiene which are of far greater proportion and significance compared to that of the Indian rojak man.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27242.1

Why this AWARE cat fight is good for civil society in Singapore

Why this AWARE cat fight is good for civil society in Singapore

It hardly requires any elaboration; people should try to resolve their differences peacefully.

Only one problem; I don’t agree completely with what I have just said above.

The way I see it some disputes could well do with a slug out in the open; as its conceivable one reason why the unexpected turn of events transpired in the way it did with AWARE when a group from nowhere came along and suddenly swapped out the old could well be a by product of what usually happens when contentious subjects are given perfunctory treatment instead of being argued out thoroughly – they usually find sneaky ways to muscle their way in.

You could even say it stands the test of reason; when contentious issues such as Christian versus liberal gay rights are treated as sensitive and out of bounds; people don’t just pack their bags and go back home to their board games - these points of contention don’t just go into some dark corner and die – they find alternative means of expressions which are usually sinister and underhanded – that’s the problem when we fear open conflict to such an extent everyone is so busy pretending to play happy families instead of trying to hammer out their differences in a robust and spirited manner – politics is pushed into half light of the preamble.

The problem with avoiding conflict at all cost is the latent fault lines shows up in the practice it inspires. For one they are crumbly as they have never been forcefully dragged out and given a thorough and robust examination. For example: a politics that brackets (excludes from discussion) morality and religion too completely soon generates its own disenchantment – as not only does it produce a type of discourse that is shallow but it also lacks moral resonance and frequently creates missing blanks instead of facilitating deep spirited understanding. Result: they find undesirable and even sneaky outlets for expression.

Anyone who is concerned over the fate of civil society and where it’s heading in Singapore should take a deeper and longer look at the AWARE saga – as what we may actually be witnessing isn’t nearly the polished sheen of civil society that we usually associate with the Western model - where it is reliably able to contain under conditions of peace if not civility, a remarkable range of moral, ideological, and religious conflicts. What we have instead in the guise of the AWARE impasse is something closer to a Darwinian primordial soup system of civil society that is still very much in its infancy as it struggles to find its footing to successfully articulate how it should deal with these contentious topics without running the real risk of imploding into a thousand pieces.

Despite the challenges; there is much to be gained from the ongoing medley in AWARE as this can only mean the various factions will have to sooner or latter hammer out that happy middle ground where they are able to compromise on what radically divides them, if they are to remain effective – at stake is not only women’s welfare, the role of religion versus secularism but the broader narrative of how is Singaporean civil society going to be able to pursue their competing ends without having to threaten the means by imperiling the stability and legitimacy of the system?

For both sides; the emerging challenges remains daunting as not only isn’t there any road maps to guide the various actors how they should rightly pursue these differing interest - but given that most of the moral, ideological, and religious conflicts remain so polarized the real challenge for these factions in AWARE may be to find a way where despite their differences, they may still be able to share a common platform with people (and maybe even have enough space to accommodate the lunatic fringe) whose views they disagree and despise.

If AWARE can find that mythical happy common ground – it could be said, despite their set backs, it would still be a resounding success for the whole idea of Singapore civil society – as “agreeing to disagree” can only stand as a worthy testament that despite the glaring differences which may prevent both sides from seeing eye to eye on a broad range of issues – it also means: the cohesion of our society is still stronger than its divisions – and that will certainly be source of hope and inspiration for many who may hold differences to do the same – find peace.

I wish them luck. Carry on please!

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27241.1


Singapore ranks second-lowest for job satisfaction

S'pore ranks second-lowest for job satisfaction

By JOYCE HOOI

SINGAPOREANS have long been suspected to be a dissatisfied bunch - and now there are numbers to add to that view.

In Robert Half's latest survey of finance professionals, Singapore ranks second-lowest worldwide for job satisfaction, with only 53 per cent of local respondents claiming to be satisfied with their job.

Ironically though, their dissatisfaction may stem largely from their uncertainty over being able to keep their job.

Ranked third-lowest worldwide for satisfaction with job security, only 54 per cent of local respondents said they were satisfied with job security in their current position.

'As job losses continue to mount, concerns about job security, career prospects and the ability to maintain a work-family balance as workload increases are heightened,' said Tim Hird, managing director of Robert Half Singapore.

'During these tough times, managers must demonstrate strong leadership in managing their staff, to not just allay their concerns but also to motivate and encourage them and keep overall employee morale high.'

Other Asians are not much happier in their jobs than Singaporeans, forming a regional theme of dissatisfaction. Bringing up the rear on the job satisfaction front, Japan ranked the lowest globally at 47 per cent, while Hong Kong was third-lowest at 54 per cent.

Worldwide, finance professionals in Dubai were the happiest job-wise, with 85 per cent claiming to be satisfied.

Singapore's finance professionals also scored low on company loyalty, with 59 per cent of them saying they felt 'very loyal' or 'rather loyal' to their firm.

The only other countries in the survey that ranked lower than Singapore on this count were Hong Kong and Japan with 42 per cent and 21 per cent respectively.

Not surprisingly, only 11 per cent of local respondents said they plan to stay in their current job for the next 12 months, the smallest proportion worldwide.

Forty per cent are either actively looking for another job or plan to do so in the next 12 months. In Hong Kong - the only country to outrank Singapore in this area - 45 per cent of respondents plan a job change.

In Singapore, the main reason cited for a job switch was an increase in pay, for which 35 per cent indicated they would walk. A better work-life balance came in a distant second, with 21 per cent of respondents citing it is the reason for a job change.

'Especially in these uncertain times, we are advising both our clients and candidates to focus less on monetary compensation packages but more on the content and scalability of jobs,' said Mr Hird.

The survey was conducted by the consulting firm in October last year. It involved 3,556 finance professionals globally, 200 of whom were in Singapore.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27240.1

Shin Min Daily News Editor got 1 day jail for causing death

Shin Min Daily News Editor got 1 day jail for causing accident

Is this ridiculous or what ?
I mean, 1 day and $2000 fine ?
A Shin Min Daily news editor Lim Hong Eng got off “Super-lightly” with only 1 day jail and $2000 fine (Attachment #1, Tag 1, 2 & 3).
All these for causing traffic accident, injuring a motorcyclist and killing the pillion (A maid).

Justice Choo said that the case “should not be seen as a precedent” (Attachment #2, Tag 4).
Well, by not setting a precedent, he set a precedent actually.

Justice Choo also explained that the driver (Lim Hong Eng) did not know that the light was red against her and thus an act of “Rash” not “Negligent” (Attachment #2, Tag 6).
Does it mean that the traffic light at the accident area is so unclear that she (Lim Hong Eng) cannot see it or differentiate red and green light ?
If so, the traffic department should also take up responsibility in the accident.
Or is the traffic light spoilt (Which was not mentioned anywhere in the report) ?

Does it mean that if someone got enough money to hire the best lawyer to change it from “Negligent” to “Rash”, he/she can get away basically “Scot free” ?

I feel sad for the victims of the “Rash” behaviour.
Owning a car is like having the freedom to go anywhere in Singapore.
But always remember that when you’re driving happily, you’re also driving a killing machine.

Attachment #1: Today, 18 Apr 2009, Page 1

20090418a1_newseditorgetawaywithonedayjailforcausingdeathintrafficaccident_todaypg1

Attachment #2: Today, 18 Apr 2009, Page 3

20090418a2_newseditorgetawaywithonedayjailforcausingdeathintrafficaccident_todaypg3

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27239.1

Avery Lodge – a “six-star dormitory for workers”

Avery Lodge – a “six-star dormitory for workers”

Saturday, 18 April 2009

Andrew Loh

“Very decent living. You can call it the six-star dormitory for workers,” Mr Eric Tan, our guide, told us when The Online Citizen visited the latest in dormitory living. “But for us, we’re not used to it,” Mr Tan added, as he showed us around the property.

Avery Lodge is an “upmarket” dormitory with a difference, not unlike a mini-HDB estate. Built on a two-hectare piece of land in Jalan Papan, Jurong Industrial Estate, the five-building dormitory has capacity to house 8,000 workers in 486 units. Each unit comes with its own living room, dining and kitchen areas, besides the sleeping quarters for 16 to 18 men. The compound has a gym, a sick bay, a canteen and a minimart which sells fresh foods such as fish and vegetables. Security guards man the entrances and exits points.

Avery Strategic Investments, a Morgan Stanley-controlled venture, poured in $100 million into the development. The plot of land was bought from the JTC for $40.1 million at a tender exercise in 2007. In the same year, the company bought three other foreign workers’ dormitories from JTC Corp for $153 million. Avery Lodge will bring its total bedcount capacity to 21,500, making it one of the biggest players in the field. The company charges employers $180 for each worker housed in its Jurong property. (My Paper) (CNA)

Manpower Minister Gan Kim Yong officially opened the property on 2 April. In his speech at Avery Lodge, Mr Gan said, “The design of this dormitory and its facilities show that it is possible to provide more than just basic accommodation. Besides being able to enjoy facilities such as an indoor gym and outdoor fitness park, workers living in Avery Lodge are able to return home to comfortable self-contained apartment units with bay windows and high ceilings.” (MOM)

“This will be a relatively upmarket dormitory, with bay windows, more generous floor-to-ceiling heights and space per worker, and amenities,’ said Mr Vernon Chua in an earlier interview with the Business Times. Mr Chua is the managing director of Averic Capital Management, which is the asset manager for the venture and which holds a 3 per cent stake in Avery Strategic Investments. Morgan Stanley Real Estate-managed funds hold the remaining 97 per cent.

When TOC visited Avery Lodge on 15 March, we were told that it was currently “80 per cent occupied”. The compound is impressive. It feels and looks like a brand new HDB housing estate – with five 6-stories buildings. There are open courtyards, parking lots and exercise corners for the workers. More impressive are the housing units. The living room is air-conditioned, which provides relief from the heat outside. It has a sofa, a LCD television set, a tv console, blinds on the windows, a dining table and chairs - and tiled flooring, something we haven’t seen in any of the dormitories we’ve been to. Impressive indeed.

There is a washing machine in the kitchen area, along with a refrigerator and two cooking stoves. There are two toilets and two shower rooms. The single bedroom, where the men would sleep, also has an air-conditioner and lockers, another rarity in workers’ dorms, for the men.

Avery Lodge is indeed a world away from the unhygienic, run-down and dilapidated dormitories we had seen elsewhere in Singapore. Shelley Thio, volunteer with aid group for migrant workers, TWC2, was cheered by what she saw.

However, when probed further, Mr Tan told us that the unit he was showing us was only a show flat.

In the actual living quarters for the workers, there are no air-conditioners. Neither are there LCD television sets, nor tv consoles, or blinds for the windows. There are also no washing machines or refrigerators, no ceiling fans.

And the tiled floors? The two rooms we were shown had no tiled floors.

In short, the actual living quarters for the workers would consist of the bare minimum. The employers of the men would have to bear the expense and responsibility of fitting and furnishing each unit accordingly.

We asked to view the units where the workers are already living in. Mr Tan obliged after he had made a phone call but not before telling us that no videos or pictures are allowed to be taken of the units with the men. This was in sharp contrast to the freedom we were allowed in snapping pictures and recording videos of the show flat. He also tells us not to be “shocked” by what we might see.

We are then taken to 2 unfitted and unfurnished units. The occupants are Burmese workers. In each of the two units, there are 9 double decker beds in the only bedroom, 8 to 10 rice cookers (multi-plugged system and logged into one electrical socket in the wall) on the untiled floor in the living room, several fans randomly placed around the unit and 2 gas cook tops in the kitchen.

Perhaps because of the lack of locker space, or bad personal upkeeping habits, the rooms are messy with clothes hanging everywhere, and personal effects strewn on the floor. Foodstuffs are also kept in the rooms. There are flies in the kitchen area and trash which have obviously been there for a while. The air smelled stale perhaps because of the lack of ventilation. There are no ceiling fans.

When asked how often inspections of the units are carried out, Mr Tan replied that it is done once every three months.

One worker, who approached us, said that the situation was very bad and that he disliked it there.

Avery Lodge is perhaps a glimpse of the future of housing for migrant workers who have come to work in Singapore. And in all fairness, the property is of acceptable standards. Having said that, however, there are concerns which may not have anything to do with the property itself but which are just as important.

Avery Lodge houses 8,000 workers from various different countries, speaking different languages. One wonders how instructions are passed to them by the operators of the compound. When asked if there is a clinic for the men, Mr Tan said there is a sick bay. We did not get a chance to view the sick bay as it was still being set up, we were told. How many beds would there be? What kind of medical care, if any? Who will staff the bay? What are the procedures for any medical emergencies, given that the property is located deep inside an industrial estate?

The workers use multiple rice cookers – in one of the units, we saw 14 rice cookers – and plug these into one same multi-sockets adapter, potentially overloading the capacity of the electrical socket. Couple this with the workers’ tendency to have things strewn all over the place, a fire outbreak is not unthinkable. An inspection of the units only once every three months may not be appropriate. On the same note, are fire drills conducted to familiarize the workers should a fire break out?

Hygiene is perhaps the most important thing to teach the workers. For example, workers should be taught why it is important for them to clear their trash daily instead of keeping it in the quarters. When we visited the unit on the second level, we saw a pile of huge garbage laid out in a corner of the corridor. The trash was a few days old and there were houseflies hovering all over the garbage. As informed by Mr Tan, Avery Lodge is presently housing 5,000+ migrant workers and with so many people, it’s only fair to assume that they are going to generate a lot of trash. How often does Avery Lodge organise trash to be cleared on every floor? Or is this left entirely to the workers themselves?

Avery Lodge needs to conduct regular educational programmes for the workers.

Other issues which arise from our visit included:

If a worker has a complaint, who does he turn to within the compound?

The nearest bus-stop is a long way out. Where do the workers go during their off days and how do they get there?

How would the lower-paid workers be able to afford the rental of $180 per month? It would be one-third or more of their salaries.

We were part of an invited group to view the compound, which has guards watching the comings and goings. Who will have access to these closed-quartered dormitories to conduct regular and independent inspections and to have access to interview and speak to the workers about their living conditions?

To conclude, while providing migrant workers with decent lodgings is to be applauded, even if they are commercially-run dormitories, perhaps we should look beyond just dumping these workers in such compounds.

We need to look at the other aspects of dormitory living as mentioned above.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27238.1

DBS is aware

DBS is aware

No, DBS is not AWARE, they are just aware.

Observers have already observed (yes, a tautology!) and questioned the motives of DBS having a press release concerning Josie Lau's appointment as AWARE's new president.

It has also been established (by the Business Times) that Josie was part of the team behind DBS's adoption of Christian charity Focus on the Family, an organisation based in the United States and has a branch in Singapore.

DBS's press release is more than it meets the eye. When someone "breaks rank" with the organisation, it should be dealt with privately.

Why the release? Is this public relations and communications management on the part of the bank? This is all the more a valid decision, given the public relations nightmare they had late last year.

In going public with their opinions of Josie Lau, it is clear DBS is exercising some form of public relations management. This implies they know the implications and repercussions on the banks reputation in view of the events that has shredded AWARE's reputation to bits.

This implies they acknowledge the position and history of employee Josie Lau, and anticipate another public relations nightmare should the matter be not addressed.

Oh well.

I still have a burning question. A question that has yet to be answered, or even addressed: Is there an alliance behind the recent takeover of AWARE?

The situation at AWARE is not a situation. It is information warfare. Information is being hidden and/or withheld, and whatever is available is being pieced. This does not make for effective journalism, to be fair.

Various speculatiors have created even more speculation. I believe we should locate the issue at its very core. Why is there such a takeover? Who or what coordinated it?

There has been some discomfort (by AWARE members) towards the takeover - before, during and after it has occurred. Why is that so? Are they being intimidated? What is intimidating them?

In the end, as I have already mentioned, the biggest loser is women's rights and awareness. The NGO and civil society scene also suffers. Gender equality and its advocacy suffers. There is no victory for any one, even the alleged alliance, and of course, DBS included. (unrelated, but I no longer have my DBS debit card subscription. It just expired and I did not want to renew it.)

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27237.1

MM Lee: Singapore-Vietnam ties win-win

April 18, 2009
Singapore-Vietnam ties
Long term, win-win: MM
Sharing expertise with one of Asean's most promising countries can be beneficial
By Sim Chi Yin
ST PHOTO: SIM CHIN YIN

HANOI: Vietnam is one of the most promising Asean countries in the long term and Singapore can keep a win-win bilateral relationship with it by sharing its expertise, said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew yesterday.

Wrapping up a five-day official visit to Vietnam, Mr Lee gave an upbeat assessment of the country's development and of bilateral ties.

Speaking to Singapore journalists, he said: 'I see a long term win-win relationship as long as we stay ahead and they've got something to learn from us. And they are quite open. I mean, they will come and learn from us as long as they haven't got what we have.'

Over the next 20 to 30 years, Vietnam will emerge as 'a country with tremendous potential' and Singapore's relationship with the South-east Asian state may become like the links the Republic has with China, noted Mr Lee.

Singapore has nothing to lose and will win Vietnam's goodwill by helping them, said Mr Lee.

'What we take four to five years to learn, we pass over to them in one year, which is a lot of time saved for them. Sometimes, what we learn in 20 years we can show them in one or two years. That's of immeasurable value to them and they know that.'

While Singapore's transfer of expertise to China is helped by the fact that most Singaporeans speak Mandarin, that the Republic does not have many Vietnamese speakers might make the exchange with Vietnam a little more difficult. But this may be less of a problem in years to come since the Vietnamese are now furiously learning English, said Mr Lee.

Vietnam's export-driven economy - trade makes up some 160 per cent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) - has dipped in the current global slowdown, but Mr Lee noted: 'In the long term I think of all the Asean countries, they show the greatest potential.'

South-east Asia's third most populous country behind Indonesia and the Philippines, Vietnam's 'serious-minded' leaders, hardworking people and strength in maths and science stand it in good stead, added Mr Lee.

The Vietnamese students who go to Singapore on Asean scholarships are a case in point, he said.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27224.1

Josie Lau: We're ready for the task

April 18, 2009
We're ready for the task
'I have full confidence in my new exco team. We know many challenges lie ahead but this team is ready for the task. Says Josie Lau (left). -- ST PHOTO: MUGILAN RAJASEGARAN

NEW Aware president Josie Lau issued this letter to the media yesterday:

RELATED LINKS
I refer to the report, 'Unknowns knock out veterans at Aware polls' (The Straits Times, April 10) and various letters and media articles that followed.

We are delighted in the renewed interest in the reinvigorated Aware and its democratically elected Executive Committee.

There are a few important factors that warrant making, which will lend clarity to the nature of the electoral process which sparked such intense attention.

First, outgoing president Constance Singam nominated Claire Nazar as successor. Nazar nominated six out of 11 new exco members with the Old Guard's support.

Ten of 12 positions were openly contested. Old Guard Chew I-Jin's position was not contested. The entire meeting lasted 3-1/2 hours as some 20 candidates gave electoral speeches and fielded questions from the floor.

As Mrs Singam noted at the AGM's beginning, Aware's recruitment drive had succeeded through its marketing efforts. From a high of 675 in 1998, ordinary membership plummeted to 253 in 2008. At last count, there are about 400 members, and membership continues to grow at an impressive rate.

The new exco members were eager to start work. However, there were repeated delays in convening the first exco meeting. Mrs Nazar kept re-scheduling the meeting.

The first meeting was held on April 7. On April 8, Mrs Nazar abruptly and unilaterally resigned by e-mail. This left us president-less. The Aware constitution requires seven days' notice to call exco meetings. We acted swiftly and called the second exco meeting on April 15. Josie Lau was named new president unopposed. A press release was immediately issued.

As president, I am disappointed that before the second exco meeting on April 15, a requisition for an EOGM for the apparent purpose of replacing the elected exco was handed to Aware on April 14. This contained 160 signatures. No more than five signatories were present at the March 28 AGM attended by 99 ordinary members and three associate members. Some 120 of the 160 signatories appear to have been recruited just after the AGM in time to swell support for the requisition.

In the face of intense media and cyber scrutiny, I must ask this question: Why have some people cast aspersions on our good intentions? Why are they so angry with us? We've only just begun.

We seek to improve the quality of life of women in Singapore. We are pro-women, pro-family and pro-Singapore. What is so objectionable about that? Does the old guard harbour an alternative agenda? If so, they should disclose their motives and objectives fully and honestly.

Aware is a secular organisation. Its members come from different races, walks of life and hold different belief systems. Our commitment to advancing the cause of women unites us. As a democratic society, we cherish viewpoint diversity.

I have full confidence in my new exco team. We know many challenges lie ahead but this team is ready for the task.

Josie Lau
President, Aware

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27223.1

JBJ’s son steps up to do battle

Saturday April 18, 2009
JB’s son steps up to do battle
Insight: Down South
By SEAH CHIANG NEE

More young professionals with good credentials are trickling towards the opposition camp, auguring well for the growth of democracy in Singapore.

SINGAPOREANS have long had an insipid sense of political apathy aggravated by many years of top-down government, but a small breeze may be blowing.

Even among activists, few are ready to take the plunge of challenging the government in elections like in most other countries.

Even the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has to offer rich incentives to attract them.

But in these times of crisis, when the political life-span of the 85-year-old Lee Kuan Yew nears its sunset years, the ground may be starting to shift. With talk of a snap election by the year-end, more Singaporeans with good credentials are trickling towards the fledgling opposition camp.

Their entry into politics augurs well for the growth of democracy in Singapore.

The latest is a big catch for the opposition. He is the 50-year-old son of the late opposition icon JB Jeyaretnam, Lee’s erstwhile foe for decades.

Kenneth has announced he has joined the new Reform Party, has been co-opted into its leadership and seeks to stand in the next election.

The Reform Party was set up by Jeyaretnam before he died of heart failure, aged 82, seven months ago.

Kenneth said the decision was to honour his father’s long struggle for a freer society, and he would inject his own economic ideas for Singapore’s future. He will not be the only opposition recruit. When an election date becomes clearer, more candidates may rise to the surface.

Lee had predicted such a trend many years ago.

He believes that after he leaves, a new breed of bright, well-educated youths – who hitherto shun politics – will emerge to challenge the PAP.

These would be graduates from top foreign and local universities who would join opposition parties to contest in elections.

Secondly, Lee has also expressed confidence that the PAP will remain in power but only for two more elections (10 years); after that, anything goes.

Thirdly, Lee doesn’t rule out a future PAP leadership splitting into two factions after he has left, perhaps along ideological lines.

Well, the Minister Mentor is still around, relatively healthy (he’s now visiting Vietnam) and revealing no sign of wanting to go.

However, his prophesy of an infusion of youthful talent in the opposition may be coming true, even while he is still in office.

Kenneth’s arrival on the scene is a case in point. He seems to have some political acumen despite his lack of experience.

“Like the Prime Minister, I also have a double first (in Economics) from Cambridge,” he said. PM Lee Hsien Loong’s is in Mathematics.

Academic qualifications rank very high among the Singaporean voter’s preferences in a candidate.

When Hsien Loong entered politics, his Double First was a strong appeal among heartlanders, a card Kenneth is now using to good effect.

Jeyaretnam’s son is married and has a 12-year-old boy. He worked in London’s financial sector for several years before returning with his family to Singapore last April.

It has immediately raised a “Son versus Son” buzz among old-timers who still remember the old verbal battles between their respective fathers, Jeyaretnam and Lee.

Most people, however, dismiss it as unlikely. Both men are very different from their fathers, possessing none of dad’s confrontational stances or propensity for heated debate.

Even if Kenneth gets elected – a big if – the two men may face each other in Parliament in a more sombre, logical manner. At any rate, modern House rules will probably forbid any heated arguments. Both Lee and Jeyaretnam were lawyers and master debaters, while their sons are less aggressive by nature.

In these days, when Singapore needs a new strategy for its future survival, Kenneth’s discipline as a trained economist (something Jeyaretnam lacked) may be more important.

He is an important catalyst for the recruitment of professionals by his party and the opposition in general.

It comes at a time when the government is facing its strongest public pressure in many years because of a number of unpopular policies and the severe economic downturn.

Another potential candidate is Tan Kin Lian, former PAP elite and ex-CEO of NTUC Income (insurance giant of the National Trades Union Congress).

Tan became a folk-hero of sorts when he organised weekly rallies to help Singaporeans recover their losses from being “misled” into investing in the defunct Lehmans structured notes sold by the local DBS Bank.

An active blogger, he has not shown his hand yet, but says he may possibly contest as a candidate for an established opposition party.

Meanwhile, the main opposition parties have reported an increase in their recruitment of younger potential candidates.

The long surviving SPP leader, Chiam See Tong, who has recovered from a stroke, hopes to battle in a bigger pond, fighting in a group constituency, and to let his wife defend his strong turf at Potong Pasir.

“I already have a team. We have one doctor, one accountant, two lawyers,” he told a reporter.

The opposition Workers Party was recently hit by resignations of four cadre members, including two past candidates.

Officials, however, say the loss is more than made up for by new recruits. “The process of renewal is on track,” said its leader and MP Low Thia Khiang.

Its team is getting younger, with nine of 15 CEC members below the age of 40. For the PAP, however, the worry is voter reaction, rather than the opposition moves. That will decide its fortunes.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27200.1

Fitting NTU to a T

Fitting NTU to a T

With engineering at its core, NTU should be the university with exciting interfaces between different disciplines rather than follow a comprehensive model like Harvard or Berkeley said NTU Provost Bertil Andersson.
“There’s a lot of new knowledge today and what students require is inter-disciplinarity,” he told the Enquirer in a recent interview.

“No one wants to be just an engineer; no one wants to be just a scientist. Young people today want to have a broader base; they want to look at the totality and to understand more things.”“No one wants to be just an engineer; no one wants to be just a scientist. Young people today want to have a broader base; they want to look at the totality and to understand more things.”

And NTU’s strength lies in its ability to be a university “based upon engineering and science, but having these interfaces”.

For example, combining engineering with biology creates new devices and biomaterial while engineering with business is “very important for the industry”, Prof Andersson explained.

About half of the current university undergraduate population are engineering students, and the university has marketed itself as one which offers a well-rounded global education with a distinctive edge in science and technology, according to its website.

In a speech at NTU’s 50th anniversary celebration four years ago, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong challenged NTU to choose between the Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) model.

“Both are outstanding institutions. But whereas Harvard is strong in all disciplines, MIT builds its reputation on its Science and Engineering schools, even though its Humanities and Social Sciences departments are world class,” PM Lee said. “NTU has to choose between these two models. You can aspire to be either like Harvard or MIT, but you cannot aspire to be both.”

If NTU were to become the MIT of the East, its name should stick added Prof Andersson, using the Ivy League in the United States as a comparison.

“If you look at the Nobel prizes in the last 50 years after World War II, which universities have the most Nobel prizes?” said Prof Andersson, currently a member of the Board of Trustees of the Nobel Foundation.

“It’s Harvard – it’s a comprehensive university. No 2 is Berkeley, it’s a comprehensive university. And No 3 is Oxford, Cambridge, also comprehensive.”

However, in the last 15 years MIT, Stanford and Caltech are first, second and third respectively with Harvard ninth on the list, he said to prove his point.

“Many of these universities have a “T” in their names. MIT is not just engineering; it also has humanities, so it’s also an interdisciplinary university but the engineering is in the center,” said Prof Andersson, adding that comprehensive universities may be too diluted to really concentrate on their research efforts.

Hence there’s no reason for NTU to drop the “T” from its name. “The ‘N’ is for Nanyang, the ‘T’ is for Technological, the ‘U’ is for University – I think everyone has its share,” he said. “And then the ‘T’ stands for the core of the university.”

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27961.3

NU way to name change for NTU

NU way to name change for NTU

NU way to name change for NTU

The Enquirer polled 150 students at various locations in NTU campus on their views about renaming the university---Illustration: Lin Junjie

Most NTU students are against the idea of a name change from ‘Nanyang Technological University’ to ‘Nanyang University’ according to a straw poll.

The poll indicated that 66% of 150 respondents said no to the suggestion of a change in the name of the university. Engineering students made up close to two-thirds of those against renaming the university.

In 2003, NTU led by President Su Guaning, aimed towards changing the university’s name to Nanyang University by 2005. However, in 2004, this plan was shelved.

According to a Straits Times article dated July 2004, President Su said this change will only take place once NTU becomes a full-fledged comprehensive university.

In response to the poll, many expressed the change as impractical and strange.

“NTU is already a global name. Having the name changed means we have to inform the world all over again.”Ms Lee Wei Ting, a second-year Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE) student, said: “NTU is already a global name. Having the name changed means we have to inform the world all over again.”

“NU sounds strange,” first-year Economics major Mr Seng Yuan Gan said. He is not alone as Mr Lim Kuan Chien, majoring in Biological Engineering, feels that the acronym for the university must have three letters. “If not, it won’t sound nice,” the 20-year-old said.

Another concern was the identity of the old Nanyang University.

Mr Shang Yun Zhou, a second-year EEE major from China felt that NTU is different from the Nanyang University of the past as it was a mandarin-speaking university.

In addition, business student Sim Yihui expressed her concern that Nantah alumni will be unhappy if NTU were to change its name to Nanyang University.

“I read in the Straits Times before that a lot of the Nantah alumni do not see NTU as a continuation of Nantah,” the 21-year-old said.

Meanwhile, the remaining third of the total respondents warmed to the idea of a name change for several reasons. One factor was the presence of schools outside the technological field.

Second-year Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering student Mr Kevin Koh believes that having a strong business school is a good reason for renaming the university better known for its engineering schools.

“…because of the stereotypical thinking of the word technological, my UK friend asked why is an arts school doing in a technological university?” 19-year-old School of Art, Design and Media student Ms Jane Koh said.“…because of the stereotypical thinking of the word technological, my UK friend asked why is an arts school doing in a technological university?” 19-year-old School of Art, Design and Media student Ms Jane Koh said.

Besides the renaming of the university, the poll also asked students if Nantah was part of NTU. Nanyang University then, in the 1950s up till 1980, was commonly known as Nantah.

About 43% of the respondents were unsure about Nantah and its history relating to NTU. The remaining students were divided in their opinions over Nantah.

Second-year EEE major Ms Wong Yan Nan from China feels that although Nantah is part of NTU, it is now history. “It’s just a name and it does not matter,” she said.

However, there are others like final-year EEE student Mr Kheu Zong Jie who is certain that Nantah is part of NTU. “Monuments at Yunnan Garden are a big reminder of the Nantah Spirit,” he said.

Mr Allen Lee, an environmental engineering major and member of the NTU Basketball team, shared with the Enquirer the sense of encouragement felt at his games when the “old boys — really old, with white hair — come down to cheer on the NTU Basketball team”.

“That’s probably the Nantah spirit,” the 23-year-old said.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27961.2

Nantah’s spectre haunts NTU’s name

Nantah’s spectre haunts NTU’s name

Nantah’s spectre haunts NTU’s name

The original Nantah gate now stands awkwardly amid HDB flats in Jurong West, quite a distance from the NTU campus where a proposal to rename it "Nanyang University" has similarly been forgotten. --Photo: Liew Shi Xiong

When late calligrapher and poet Pan Shou called for NTU to be renamed simply as Nanyang University in 1998, he saw it as a way to “quieten the hearts of many”, reflecting a desire among some Nantah alumni to see the old name of their alma mater brought back.

The remark was made in Mr Pan’s acceptance speech for an honorary degree to recognize his contributions to the arts in Singapore, and to Nantah, which he served as the first General Secretary in its early days.

However, on the same day, both then NTU president Cham Tao Soon and the then Education Minister Teo Chee Hean present at the ceremony told reporters that they saw no need for a name change. They felt that NTU was a name already well-known in the world, and the word “technological” reflected its strength and focus well.

Mr Pan passed away a year later, before he could see current NTU president Su Guanning express plans to drop the “T” in NTU by 2005.

Shortly after taking office in 2003, Dr Su had mentioned in an interview with the Straits Times of his desire to revive the “fighting spirit” in the founding of Nantah by adopting its name.

Yet, in a dramatic turn of events, Dr Su announced a year later that he would put the renaming on hold until NTU becomes a full-fledged, comprehensive university. The matter has not been brought up again.

History of Nantah

Nanyang University, or Nantah, was established in 1955 and merged with the University of Singapore (SU) in 1980 to form the National University of Singapore (NUS).

However, most Nantah alumni saw it as a forced closure of their alma mater. The bitterness ran deep, as the 12,000 Nantah graduates felt marginalised by a society that did not recognize their degrees. Many of them were unable to find jobs, or were given little pay compared to SU graduates.

In addition, Nantah was built using donations from Chinese from all walks of life – including trishaw riders, cabaret girls and washerwomen – to realise a dream of setting up a Chinese university in Singapore. This added to the deep sense of loss Nantah alumni felt when they saw an English medium technological institution set up where their mother school used to be.

Nanyang Technological Institute, which opened on the former Nantah campus in 1981, was expanded to become Nanyang Technological University 10 years later.

Proposed name change stirs alumni

The proposal to drop the “T” by Dr Su Guanning was endorsed by Mr R. Sinnakarupan, president of the then 75,000-member NTU Alumni Club. For more than a year since January 2003, news in the media reported only NTU’s steps in pushing towards reviving Nantah, setting 2005 as the target date.

Yet, it was not mentioned that there were dissenting voices from various alumni, who took to the Internet to voice their objection.

A Nantah graduate, who currently resides in Canada, conducted an online straw poll of 50 alumni, of which all but one saw NTU as a separate entity from Nantah and not a resurrection of the former Chinese university.

The pollster, Dr Choo Eng Ung, also posted a declaration online with three other alumni to state that there is “only one real history of Nanyang University” – that it was shut down in 1980 and has ceased to exist.

The declaration, supported by 72 Nantah alumni, sought to “stop NTU from using the exact name ‘Nanyang University’”, in order to “protect and preserve the integrity of the true legendary history of our alma mater Nanyang University”.

“Most alumni, including me, see Nanyang University as having officially ceased to exist at age 25,” Mr. Chong said.Various Nantah graduates interviewed by the Enquirer, like Mr Chong Wing Hong, echoed the views of the online voices. “Most alumni, including me, see Nanyang University as having officially ceased to exist at age 25,” Mr. Chong said.

“A group of alumni thought that NTU should be ‘linked’ with Nanyang University. But Dr Su tried it, and it didn’t work out,” added the senior writer for Lianhe Zaobao.

“NTU is a new and independent university,” said Mr Tan Hock Lay, another Nantah alumnus. “The cultural, social and academic environment of NTU and Nantah are also largely different, so there is no point in bringing up a name change.”

Another objection to using the name Nanyang University was its historical baggage and the possibility of rekindling old grievances Nantah alumni experienced during the “forced closure”, said Mr Chong, the senior writer for Lianhe Zaobao.

This sentiment is reflected by another alumnus, who wished to remain anonymous. He and his Nantah schoolmates were so unhappy being viewed as NTU Alumni that they “tore up NTU letters asking for donations every year”.

“The Massachusetts University in the USA is still called Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Yet it has a strong humanities and social sciences faculty, and has produced many excellent graduates. To change the name is not an issue.”“There is no harm continuing using the name ‘Nanyang Technological University’,” said Mr Chong. “The Massachusetts University in the USA is still called Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Yet it has a strong humanities and social sciences faculty, and has produced many excellent graduates. To change the name is not an issue.”

President of Nanyang University Alumni Academic Society, Dr. Choong Chow Siong, admitted that he was among the minority of Nantah graduates who also sees himself as an alumnus of NTU.

“There are two types of alumni of NTU – those who graduated from the university itself, the other established under the legislation,” Dr Choong said. Under a parliamentary act in 1995, the Nantah alumni rolls were transferred from NUS to NTU.

“Everyone has already deep set perception about what happened,” said Dr Choong, referring to those Nantah alumni who do not share his outlook as a dual alumnus of Nantah and NTU. “There is no need to actively push for a change in view, because it would be a 180-degrees change, one that is not easy to achieve.”

As for the continued possibility of a name change, Dr Choong said it is an important decision that should be made by stakeholders of NTU and Nantah together.

Name change shelved, for now

In July 2004, Dr Su suddenly announced a change of plan, saying renaming would come only after NTU becomes a full-fledged varsity. The move was backed by then Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan. This time, there was no timeline.

It was unclear whether objections from various Nantah alumni were the cause of what happened. Yet, six years after Dr Su’s proposed name change, it seems as if renaming NTU has already dropped off the radar.

During a global reunion of Nantah graduates in Beijing on 17 October last year, a discussion found that while reviving the “Nantah spirit” continues to be among hopes of alumni, the option of renaming NTU is no longer within consideration.

More importantly, NTU Provost Bertil Andersson said in an interview with The Enquirer that NTU would retain its technological focus, a theme that fit well with what Dr Su said during his speech at NTU’s 2006 convocation.

“Among the three public universities in Singapore, we are the only science and technology university approximating MIT, whose excellence we want to emulate.”“Prime Minister Lee asked if we aspire to be Harvard or MIT. You will not be surprised that the answer is MIT,” Prof Su said as he addressed the freshly minted NTU graduates. “Among the three public universities in Singapore, we are the only science and technology university approximating MIT, whose excellence we want to emulate.”

When pressed for a response on the renaming issue, the university replied with “no comments”, and The Enquirer has been unable to get a response from Dr Su himself thus far.

Perhaps Mr Pan Shou’s wish may never be realized, but it appears a sizeable group of Nantah alumni — who do not want Nantah’s name to be used for what they feel is an unrelated entity — want to keep it that way.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27961.1