Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Singaporean paddler Li Jiawei announces pregnancy

Singaporean paddler Li Jiawei announces pregnancy
By Patwant Singh, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 28 April 2009 2002 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

Li Jiawei & husband hold wedding reception in Beijing

SINGAPORE: Singaporean paddler Li Jiawei is pregnant.

The 27-year-old revealed this to Singapore media on Tuesday after informing the Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA).

Li and her businessman husband Li Chao threw a lavish wedding in Beijing last Saturday. The couple met through a mutual friend and registered their marriage in the Chinese capital on September 26 after a six-month romance.

The star paddler, who won Singapore a silver medal at the recent Beijing Olympics, had agreed with the STTA on a family planning pact last month.

Under it, she must have a baby by the end of next year, or wait till the 2012 Olympics are over, so that she can recover in time for the next Olympics.

Li could not be reached in Beijing, but STTA President Lee Bee Wah confirmed the pregnancy.

Madam Lee added that after the Beijing Olympics, the paddler had told her that she would like to give birth to her child in Singapore and that Li's mother would help care for the baby.

- CNA/yt

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28022.4

China on full alert for swine flu

China on full alert for swine flu
Posted: 28 April 2009 1849 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

A woman walks past a screen broadcasting news about the swine flu in downtown Beijing, China.
Video
China on full alert for swine flu
Special Report
Swine Flu Outbreak

BEIJING - China went on full alert Tuesday to head off swine flu, with authorities ordering stepped up supervision of the world's biggest pig population as several children fell sick with suspicious symptoms.

President Hu Jintao ordered the government to step up measures to prevent the virus entering China and control any possible outbreak to "ensure the people's health and safety", state television said in a brief report.

However, the World Health Organization said there were no confirmed or even probable cases of the potentially deadly virus in China, and said the government's surveillance system was working.

"There are several suspected cases under investigation," said Hans Troedsson, the WHO representative in China.

He told a press conference that he believed a school in the northern Chinese province of Shaanxi had been closed down as one of several precautions taken by the government since global fears over swine flu emerged.

"The students had symptoms of respiratory infections," he said.

But he added that as far as he knew, none of the students at the school had been to Mexico, the epicentre of the outbreak. He gave no details of the location of the school.

He also said it was likely they did not have swine flu.

"There are no confirmed and no probable cases in China," he said.

An official at the Shaanxi provincial health department, who declined to give her name, said she had no information on the reported incident.

Swine flu is believed to have claimed the lives of more than 150 people in Mexico and is known to have spread to the United States, Canada, Britain, Spain, Israel and New Zealand.

China has close to 450 million pigs -- half of the world's total -- according to the national meat industry body, making the Asian nation a potentially high-risk location.

China's leaders on Tuesday pledged open and quick reporting of any cases of swine flu, as they ordered the mobilisation of the nation's health system to tackle the potential crisis.

The government, heavily criticised for initially covering up the SARS epidemic in 2003, has made fighting the disease its "central task," according to a statement issued after a Cabinet meeting chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao.

The State Council ordered a raft of measures including the establishment of a "direct reporting system on the epidemic leading to early discovery, early reports, early diagnosis, early quarantine and early treatment."

"As soon as cases are discovered in our borders they must be publicly announced in a timely manner," the Cabinet statement said.

China initially tried to deny the existence of the deadly outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, within its borders -- acknowledged it only after the illness spilled over into other countries.

Troedsson, who met with China's health minister earlier Tuesday, said he believed the situation was different now.

"China and other countries are much better prepared than before SARS and avian influenza," he said.

The meeting chaired by Wen marked a sharp escalation in China's response on swine flu, as the situation overseas has quickly worsened.

The State Council ordered strict monitoring of people arriving in China from affected areas and strengthened supervision of the pig-raising industry, pig markets, and the import and exports of pigs.

- AFP/ir


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.3

Swine flu: S'pore raises alert level

April 28, 2009
Swine flu outbreak
S'pore raises alert level
Gowned nurses prepare equipment at the dedicated assessment and decontamination room for Swine Flu at the Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH), where suspected cases are isolated after being brought from the airport. -- ST PHOTO: ALPHONSUS CHERN
SINGAPORE'S Ministry of Health on Tuesday night raised the pandemic alert phase for swine flu outbreaks from green to yellow as the epidemic has entered a new phase with more than 16 countries reporting confirmed or suspected infections.

It comes after the World Health Organisation upped the level from Phase 3 to 4, warning of a significant rise in the risk of a pandemic.

VIDEO
'The change to a higher phase indicates that there is sustained human-to-human transmission, capable of causing community-level outbreaks,' said a joint statement from MOH, the Civil Aviation of Singapore (CAAS) and Maritime Port Authority (MPA) on Tuesday night.

'This is to better brace ourselves to handle situations where there may be isolated imported cases but no sustained local transmission.'

While the statement restated that there are no human cases of swine flu in Singapore, it revealed that 17 cases have been referred for further medical assessment.

Sixteen were referred to the Communicable Disease Centre (CDC) and one case was seen at Singapore General Hospital. Three cases referred to the CDC, which included the two referred on Monday, have all tested negative for Influenza A. The case seen in SGH has tested negative as well. Most of the other new cases are Singaporeans who have recently returned from the United States, said the statement.

Cases seen at the CDC and in the other hospitals would undergo a preliminary test for Influenza A, the virus type associated with swine flu and the circulating strains. The preliminary test result will be available within a day but confirmation of the swine influenza strain will take up to seven days, said the statement.

Meanwhile, healthcare institutions in Singapore have intensified their infectious disease control measures under the heightened Yellow alert level.

Additional measures include donning full personal protective equipment especially in high risk areas such as the emergency department and intensive care unit, rescheduling elective admissions, cutting down visitors to patients, and recording of contact particulars of visitors.

These will help reduce unnecessary exposure, provide for surge capacity and facilitate contact tracing when the need arises.

Hospitals will also restrict inter-hospital movement of patients and staff, except in emergencies. Polyclinics and specialist outpatient clinics are also setting up triage centres to manage symptomatic patients with a travel history to affected areas, or contact with such persons.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.2

MM Lee says S'pore not taking any chances in dealing with swine flu

MM Lee says S'pore not taking any chances in dealing with swine flu
By Pearl Forss, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 28 April 2009 2112 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">


Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (file pic)

SINGAPORE: Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said Singapore is well prepared to deal with swine flu.

"It's like an act of god, it's like SARS. How long will it last? I don't know, but we are taking all the precautions. We are taking no chances. We learn from SARS and we got all the precautions in place," he said.

The minister mentor was speaking on board the Singapore Flyer on Tuesday where he had been invited, along with 140 of his staff, their families, and his family for a ride.

The trip is Mr Lee's first time on the Flyer since it opened on April 15 last year.

When asked about how Singapore's tourism industry will weather the downturn as more attractions open amidst the global recession, Mr Lee said there have been reports of green shoots in the American economy.

Although he has his doubts, Mr Lee said it is good that Americans are optimistic.

Governments worldwide are counting on a recovery in the American economy to lift the global economy as it is the key export market for many countries such as China, Korea, Vietnam and Singapore.


- CNA/so

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.1

MOE seeks clarification on claims on AWARE's programmes

MOE seeks clarification on claims on AWARE's programmes
By Zhang Tingjun, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 28 April 2009 1953 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

Dr Thio Su Mien at the AWARE press conference
Related News

Keep religion above fray of petty politics, says Dr Balakrishnan

Government won't interfere in AWARE saga

AWARE Old Guard say they feel responsible for what has happened
Video
MOE seeks clarification on claims on AWARE's programmes

SINGAPORE: The Education Ministry (MOE) has contacted Dr Thio Su Mien, who is the "feminist mentor" to the new exco in the Association of Women for Action & Research (AWARE), to clarify the claims she was reported to have made on the organisation's sexuality programmes.

In a statement, MOE said it had not received any complaints from parents or from Dr Thio about the programmes.

The AWARE saga has stretched out over the past weeks and Dr Thio's views have been reported widely. She has been quoted as saying that on AWARE's sexuality programme, homosexuality is now regarded as a neutral word, not a negative word.

Giving details, MOE said 11 secondary schools engaged AWARE to run workshops on sexuality last year. The organisation also conducted assembly talks on topics such as self esteem at a few schools.

Schools that engaged AWARE found its programme content appropriate for their students, adhering to MOE guidelines.

Speaking to reporters at a visit to Yishun Town Secondary School, Senior Minister of State for Education S Iswaran said sexuality education is taught primarily by teachers, but schools have the flexibility to bring in other organisations.

"The guiding principle for this is very simple. It uses the family as the basic building block, as the basic foundation and helps the students make values-based decision on the whole issue of sexuality and in a manner that's sensitive to the multi-racial, multi-religious environment.

"Clearly, there are different perspectives in our society so MOE takes a very deliberate and cautious approach," he said.

The Education Ministry added that if parents know of an instance where these guidelines have not been adhered to, they should go directly to the ministry.


- CNA/so


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.135

AWARE's extraordinary meeting to be held at Singapore Expo

AWARE's extraordinary meeting to be held at Singapore Expo
By Cheryl Lim, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 28 April 2009 2201 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

AWARE's new exco held a press conference on 23 April

SINGAPORE: The Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) has changed the venue of its extraordinary meeting to Singapore Expo Hall 2.

The meeting, which will be held on 2 May from 2-5pm, was originally scheduled to be held at the HSR building in Toa Payoh.

AWARE's new executive committee had previously said they were looking for a new venue to accommodate the association's growing members who are expected to turn up.

According to AWARE spokesperson Lois Ng, the association's membership has now hit "four-figures".

Members will have to produce their identification cards for admission and registration.

Foreigners who are members will be required to produce their passports for the same purposes.

The new executive committee has also appointed law firm Rajah & Tann to act as their legal advisers.

- CNA/ir


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28078.2

AWARE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING

EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING
TO BE HELD ON 2ND MAY 2009

Notice is hereby given that:


1. The venue of the Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) of the Association of Women for Action & Research (“AWARE”) to be held on nd May 2009 , from 2.00 p.m. to
5.00 p.m. is hereby changed as follows:

Singapore EXPO Hall 2
1 Expo Drive, #01-01
Singapore 486150


Admission and registration would be from 1.00pm to 2.00pm on 2nd May 2009 .

It is mandatory to show your NRIC for admission and registration.


2. Messrs Rajah & Tann have been appointed to act as AWARE’s legal advisors to attend the EGM to be convened on 2nd May 2009 to address legal queries relating to, and raised during, the EGM including the matters intended to be transacted, AWARE’s constitution and meeting law and procedure.

By Order Of The Executive Committee


Jenica Chua
Honorary Secretary
Association of Women for Action & Research

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28078.1

MOE's Reply to Recent Comments and Claims About AWARE’s Sexuality Education Programme in Schools

MOE's Reply to Recent Comments and Claims About AWARE’s Sexuality Education Programme in Schools

1We refer to recent claims and comments about AWARE’s sexuality education programme in schools.

2Sexuality education conducted in MOE schools is premised on the importance of the family and respect for the values and beliefs of the different ethnic and religious communities on sexuality issues. The aim is to help students make responsible values-based choices on matters involving sexuality.

3Core programmes are delivered by teachers but schools do collaborate with other agencies in delivering additional modules. However, in doing so, schools must ensure that any programmes run by external agencies are secular and sensitive to the multi-religious make-up of our society. Parents can choose to opt their children out of these programmes.

4Last year, 11 secondary schools engaged AWARE to run workshops for their students. The number of students involved in each school ranged from about 20 to 100, and each workshop lasted 3 hours. The objectives of these workshops were to provide students with accurate information on Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)/HIV, to help students understand the consequences of premarital sexual activity, and to equip students with skills such as decision-making and resisting negative peer pressure.

5AWARE also conducted assembly talks, typically of 45-minute duration, for students in a few secondary schools. Some of the areas covered in the talks included body image, self-esteem, eating disorders, teenage pregnancies, sexual harassment and the role of women in today’s context.

6The schools that engaged AWARE found that the content and messages of the sessions conducted were appropriate for their students and adhered to guidelines to respect the values of different religious groups. The schools did not receive any negative feedback from students who attended the workshops and talks or their parents.

7In particular, MOE has also not received any complaint from parents or Dr Thio Su Mien, who was reported to have made specific claims about sexuality education in our schools. MOE has contacted Dr Thio Su Mien to seek clarifications and facts to substantiate her claims.

8If parents and members of the public know of specific instances where guidelines have not been adhered to, they should report them directly to MOE to investigate. MOE recognises that sexuality education is sensitive. In conducting these programmes, the views of parents will be respected and values taught should not deviate from the social norms accepted by mainstream society in Singapore.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.133

Church of Our Saviour pastor leads prayer for new Aware president, her husband & family

Tussle for Aware
Our church is in the news, it's not what I wanted
Church of Our Saviour pastor leads prayer for new Aware president, her husband & family
IT WAS just another Sunday it seemed at the Church of Our Saviour yesterday.
By Amanda Yong
28 April 2009

IT WAS just another Sunday it seemed at the Church of Our Saviour yesterday.

The church was in the news earlier because of its links to several members of the new committee of the troubled women's group, Aware.

Just another Sunday until churchgoers were invited to pray for the controversial new Aware president, Ms Josie Lau, and her husband Dr Alan Chin.

The new Aware president attends the church with her family regularly. So does at least three other members of the Aware executive committee (exco) and their self-styled 'feminist mentor', Dr Thio Su Mien.

The congregation bowed their heads as Pastor Derek Hong led them in a prayer for the couple and their children.

Husband and wife stood on the stage of the auditorium next to the pastor, their faces stoic, their bodies still.

'It's not easy for them,' Pastor Hong told churchgoers.

'They didn't ask for this.'

In his prayer for them, Pastor Hong sought protection, strength, courage, clarity and 'the ability to express things in a way that is winsome and true'.

He also said: 'Our church has been in the news. It's not what I wanted.

'It's a difficult time for many people. Yet in the midst of all this, God is doing wonderful things... a dimension that is taking place that's beyond social issues and (the) political agenda...'

Indirect reference to Aware saga

This was the only occasion when Pastor Hong made indirect reference to the Aware saga.

There had been no mention of Aware earlier during the entire service.

I had attended the 10.30am service at the church in Margaret Drive, instead of at my usual church, as I was curious to learn if it was indeed part of the Christian Right, as some detractors of the new Aware exco had suggested.

But it was an ordinary service for the most part.

There was the usual singing led by a worship leader, the prayers and pastor's welcome to new visitors.

The people, who streamed into the auditorium where the service was held, appeared a diverse bunch - couples, families, the young and old, the able-bodied and the handicapped, well-dressed tai tais and folks in bermudas and flip-flops.

None of them appeared perturbed about the flap in Aware and mention of their church's name.

Nor was there any visible reaction when midway through the church service, Pastor Hong invited Dr Chin to share a testimony about his sister's sudden illness and unexpected recovery.

Ms Lau's husband steals limelight

So for a while, it was Ms Lau's husband who stole the limelight at the church yesterday.

Dr Chin said his sister Suzanne, who has been living in Hong Kong for the last 15 years, suffered a sudden cardiac arrest last Monday.

In the intensive care unit, her condition degenerated into multiple organ failure and later 'brain stem death'.

Dr Chin and his mother flew to Hong Kong last Monday night. Last Wednesday, her eyes blinked and her fingers twitched. By 1pm, she started breathing on her own.

Last Thursday, she could nod her head in response to a question. And by last Friday, she was fully conscious. She was able to recognise people around her and could write in response to their questions.

Dr Chin said he spoke to his sister on the phone yesterday morning.

'She was already asking my brother-in-law for her moisturiser and facial cleanser,' he said, with quiet satisfaction.

The story was unusual but sharing testimonies in church is commonplace. Any other member of the congregation could have stood on that stage to share a personal experience.

It is not known if this was the first time the church had prayed for Dr Chin and his wife.

Ms Lau and her husband were thrust into the media spotlight when news broke that she had been appointed as the new Aware president, replacing Mrs Claire Nazar who quit suddenly.

Then, speculation about the anti-homosexual stance of Dr Chin and Aware's new exco threw up more questions about them.

Against homosexual lifestyles

In 2007, Dr Chin had sent six letters to The Straits Times, speaking out against homosexual lifestyles. And Dr Thio had said at a press conference last week that the homosexual agenda seemed to have been the 'single objective' of the old Aware.

In his sermon, Pastor Hong went on to restate the church's position on homosexuality - available on the church's website.

Homosexual practice is a sin, he said, but no worse than other sins such as theft, greed and drunkenness.

He added that the church was against discrimination of homosexuals in areas where rights are extended to every citizen.

'We're against any form of homophobic expression... we'll be the first to stand up against any form of prejudice against homosexuals,' he said.

We are not anti-homosexual, we 'don't seek the hurt and disadvantage of these people'.

We're against the promotion of the lifestyle, and any programme that promotes homosexual behaviour as normal, he said.

He acknowledged that 'one of the sad things that are going on... there are churches in some places that take part in gay bashing'.

But, he added: 'That's wrong in the eyes of God.'

And he had chastised those who had said he should not allow gays into the church, he revealed.

Change for homosexuals is possible, he said, adding that 'in our church we've seen people who have changed'.

The church was also 'against any movement that discriminates against people who have strong personal family values'.

He then screened a news clip of the recent Miss USA beauty pageant showing Miss California Carrie Prejean's answer to celebrity blogger Perez Hilton's question about same-sex marriage and Hilton's vitriolic personal attack on Prejean.

Referring to the gay lobby, Pastor Hong said: 'If you even dare to speak against it, you get death threats, you get penalised, you get disqualified.'

He added: 'It's not a crusade against some people... there's a line... a boundary we need to adhere to so that this nation, the foundation for our children and our children's children, will be clear.'

Just another Sunday at church? Not quite, for me.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.120

‘Opposition’ versus ‘ruling’ party on 2nd May and a simulation for the next General Elections

‘Opposition’ versus ‘ruling’ party on 2nd May and a simulation for the next General Elections

SINGAPORE - The momentum is gradually gathering prior to the AWARE EOGM showdown on 2nd May. Although the clouds of uncertainty still hang over the horizon, there is always the silver lining that we can take comfort in - a defining moment for the online community who is concerned with this issue.

The events that transpired started with a team of virtual unknowns’ election to AWARE’s exco. This unknown team is effectively the current ‘ruling’ party, while the old guards of AWARE has become an ‘opposition’ party. And it seems that this ‘ruling’ party has become all-too-familiar in terms of lacking in transparency, especially when confronted with questions regarding their objectives. They followed up with draconian methods such as exclusion of the past president from meetings, purging of the old guards’ colleagues from their positions and lastly, changing the office locks to prevent anyone whom they found undesirable from accessing the office. The ‘ruling’ party has the backing and assistance of a mentor too!

Meanwhile, the ‘opposition’ party launched an online campaign “SAVE AWARE” to garner support for their cause. The website also aims to create an awareness of the events leading up to the EOGM. And it has provided links to blogs, citizen journalist-based sites and other websites devoted to the issue on hand. Facebook groups were also created to mobilize support, a leaf that is taken out of Mr Barack Obama’s book during his bid for presidency. The ‘ruling’ party on the other hand didn’t have much of an online campaign, save for an email campaign by its members’ church. In fact, one may ask if there was any organized campaign to canvass support for the ‘ruling’ party in the first place.

To the netizens’ credit, they have been responsible and have adopted a mature attitude in their dealings. Despite the religiously sensitive undertones behind the events, care has been taken to avoid any form of religious inflammation. TheOnlineCitizen, for instance, has gone the extra mile to moderate comments, which may be inflammatory in nature. I have to admit that it has been an enjoyable ride for myself personally, because I tried at times to relate the events at AWARE to the greater society at large. Thus, if we the netizens could pass this AWARE test with flying colors, we may even push the boundaries of excellence come the next elections.

As unfortunate as the events at AWARE may have been, it couldn’t have come at a later time like this. This gave netizens a chance to exercise online discourse on a sensitive topic. It also saw the ubiquitous use of Internet platforms such as Facebook and YouTube. In effect, it is some sort of a simulation exercise for the next elections. The outcome of the 2nd May EOGM could be interesting. It could be indicative of the power of an effective online campaign. Such has vindicated Mr Barack Obama in his ascendency to presidency. Hopefully, the online campaign for the past week will bear fruits. And if it does, it will send out a clear signal with regards to the power of online discourse in shaping important events within the Singapore society.

Like the ‘opposition’ team at AWARE, the opposition political parties has to go online to mobilize support. It will be the online citizen journalist sites, blogs and other similar websites that may play an influential role during the elections due to their reach.

Beyond the 2nd May EOGM, hopefully there will be more of such simulations for the netizens to aggregate together for a civil discourse, especially before the actual General Elections. And during the next General Elections, I am confident that the netizens will conduct themselves in an admirable manner, which adds to the maturity of our society. That being said, we the netizens will continue to play a part in any form of discourse pertaining to a major event.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.119

Message from Aware's President


Dear Valued Members


Since my election as President on 14th April 2009, I have
received intense media attention. A group of AWARE members has gone public
with various allegations and have called for an EGM for the specific purpose
of removing me and my team. We have only been in office for less than 20 days.


I am a woman seeking to serve other women in Singapore. Like
you, I have struggles. I do not have all easy answers to the many hard
questions that life throws up. No one does.


However, we should not be passive where we can band together to
work for positive change. There are many things worth protecting and fighting
for.


We want to make a positive difference to your lives and to our
society. A good place to start is to help the many distressed women affected
by the current economic crisis.


We are dedicated towards continuing our role as an NGO to
ensure the effective implementation of CEDAW standards. We want to see
abstract standards translated into meaningful policies which directly affect
our lives and well-being. We will constructively engage with all interested
governmental and non-governmental agencies, to progressively bring this goal
to pass.


CEDAW as a women's rights treaty belongs to all women. We are
resolved to enhance widespread awareness of CEDAW standards among Singapore
men and women and to provide an open forum to discuss how to better realise
these standards.


We wish to honour and celebrate the achievements of first
generation Singapore women and to emulate their spirit of perseverance and to
learn from their experience and vision. In so doing, we connect the present to
the past, as we work together for our better future.


I hope to see you at the upcoming EGM where we will present
preliminary details of our programme and projects. My team and I seek your
active support and participation in implementing these to serve our community.


AWARE belongs to you.


Warmest wishes


Josie Lau

 



http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27958.9


 

Kenneth Jeyaretnam needs to reply to damaging Straits Times report

Kenneth Jeyaretnam needs to reply to damaging Straits Times report

As expected, the state media has embarked on its smear campaign against Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam even before the next election.

The Reform Party founded by Kenneth’s father, the late Josua Jeyaretnam had a CEC meeting on 26 April 2009 during which Kenneth was appointed as its Secretary-General by a majority vote.

The Reform Party has issued a press release here which documents clearly the resolutions passed.

However, the Straits Times report ignore its content completely and chose instead to focus on an alleged rift between Kenneth and his father’s closest ally, the affable Mr Ng Teck Siong:

“A month after joining the fledgling Reform Party founded by his father, hedge fund manager Kenneth Jeyaretnam has taken over as its secretary-general. At the same time, a long-time ally of the late Mr J B Jeyaretnam and a co-founder of the party, quit after falling out with the younger Jeyaretnam.”

(read full article here)

To be fair to Jeremy, he did contact Kenneth who declined to comment on the matter. Nevertheless, I am still disappointed with the main thrust of his article which appeared more keen to play up on petty politicking within the party than the matter proper.

Regardless of its authenticity, this statement is damaging to Kenneth’s image as a budding politician and a response is warranted immediately.

Singapore is a conservative Asian society where the young are expected to show respect to seniors, teachers and mentors. Politicians who are perceived to lack these quintessential virtues will almost always be rejected by the electorate.

Mr Ng Teck Siong is a good friend and comrade of the late Jeyaretnam and was instrumental in setting up the Reform Party together with him.

After his passing last year, Teck Siong held the fort as the Chairman of Reform Party till the last CEC meeting after which he resigned from his position following a vote of no confidence against him.

Jeremy Au seemed to insinuate in his article that Kenneth had a personal dispute with Teck Siong which led eventually to his quitting from Reform Party while the reality may not be as such.

Some readers may be misled to perceive Kenneth as an arrogant and ungrateful upstart who has failed to show proper respect to his late friend’s close friend.

I propose that Kenneth and Teck Siong hold a press conference together to debunk any rumors of discord and ill-will between the two for the sake of the former’s political career.

Kenneth may like to take the opportunity to express his appreciation and gratitude to Teck Siong’s unwavering faith in JBJ in the past while Teck Siong should throw his full support behind Kenneth as the leader to bring Reform Party forward.

Politics is all about “wayang” and public opinion is of utmost importance. The mainstream media is an expert at manipulating public perceptions to cast aspersions on the character or capability of opposition politicians.

Once a politician is stuck with a “label” by the media, it will probably stay with him forever with no hope of redemption.

Dr Chee Soon Juan, James Gomez and Tan Lead Shake are examples of opposition politicians who have been “fixed” by the state media and never quite salvaged their embattled reputation in the eyes of the Singaporeans.

Even till today, many Singaporeans believe that Dr Chee has plotted the ouster of his mentor, the respected Mr Chiam See Tong from the Singapore Democratic Party.

I hope Kenneth can get a good start in his fledging political career and get acknowledged in due course as a credible and respected opposition leader in the mould of Mr Chiam See Tong and Mr Low Thia Kiang.

With Mr Chiam entering into the twilight of his political career, Singaporeans desperately need to get another opposition MP into Parliament and Kenneth represents our best hope.

Kenneth’s undisputed pedigree as the son of JBJ, academic qualifications and professional background as an economist will pose a formidable threat to the PAP which may already be hatching a plan to throw him off course.

Let us stay vigilant always and be alerted to any reports in the state media which may tarnish the image of Kenneth.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=26489.12

Borrowing from loansharks - criminalising without providing real choice

Borrowing from loansharks - criminalising without providing real choice

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

Ravi Philemon

“Yes, I have borrowed from Ah Long”, admits Rezal (not his real name). “But I had no other choice! My wife lost her job in the factory and now earns about $400 as a part-time dish-washer; and we cannot survive just on my pay of $800.” Rezal, who has three school-going children and works as a Lashing Specialist, says. “There are really no containers coming in for me to have work everyday”.

Rezal, who lives in a three room HDB flat with his family, says that they managed to get by when he had a full days work; and the “$400 plus” his wife brought home every fortnight working as a factory worker, made sure that they had money for marketing, transportation, pocket-money for the children and themselves, etc. But now, he has to choose between paying his bills and putting food on the table for his children.

“My relatives helped out in the beginning, but they also have their own families. Finally last month I have to go to the Ah Long to borrow $200 to pay the bills”, says Rezal. “I have to pay the Ah Long $280 at the end of this month, but I think I can manage because I have started washing cars part-time now”, Rezal adds.

Should people like Rezal who are victims of circumstances and are already victims of sharks, loan-sharks that is, be further victimised by a new law that is under study to criminalise those that borrow from loan-sharks? Mr. Wong Kan Seng, Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister for Home Affairs, says that this new law being studied by the police is to “hold borrowers accountable” for “their reckless borrowing”. He says these “reckless borrowing” endanger the safety and security of the community; and justifies it further by saying that many borrowers end up working as syndicate runners to pay off their debts, extending the circle of crime even further.

What other recourse do people like Rezal have? There is no unemployment insurance to tide the retrenched over the downturn till they find another job in Singapore. If you suddenly fall on trying times, you cannot draw a “hardship loan” from your own Central Provident Fund (CPF). If you earn less than $20,000 annually, you cannot borrow from the banks. Information on loans provided by credit co-operatives is not easily available. Since life is not a constant, what other solutions do people like Rezal have, when they are suddenly faced with the struggle of daily life?

When reminded that under the law that is currently being studied, he may be criminalised if he borrows from the loan-shark, Rezal replies, “If I have to choose between putting food on the table for my children and committing an offence by borrowing from the Ah Long, I will choose to become a criminal.”

Lawyers like Luke Lee disagree with the intention of the possible law. He says, “They are already down and out, no further action should be taken against them. Even if these victims sue the borrowers and win the case, the borrowers may not have the money to pay, and the victims would still have pay for the law suit.”

And what is the real intention of the Ministry of Home Affairs studying the implementation of this law now? Has the current economic crisis caused more people to turn to loan sharks? Have the incidences of the loan-sharks pressing for payments increased dramatically that police are struggling to cope? A Straits Times Forum writer seems to suggest as much, when the writer said that the police did not seem to take any action against the harassers, despite numerous complaints being lodged.

Such a law if implemented will surely make the job easier for the police as well as for the loan-sharks, for those that borrow from the loan-sharks, will now not come forward to say that they are being harassed, for fear of being criminalised themselves. This in turn will create a thriving black market for personal loans.

Some debtors do indeed assist the unlicensed moneylenders by becoming their runners and by aiding them in their harassment activities. But what is the actual statistics for this? There are of course “reckless borrowers” who borrow to fuel their addiction to gambling, for example. But again what are the numbers for these? Without providing the appropriate numbers and statistics, what Mr. Wong Kan Seng has done is to paint those that borrow from loan-sharks as the bogeyman who borrow recklessly and endanger the safety and security of his neighbours and community.

Of course the police should not hesitate to take action against debtors who are found to be assisting unlicensed moneylenders in their illegal activities. But not all debtors must be considered as criminal elements. There are sufficient safeguards in the current law to deter those that assist illegal money-lending activities; for the current law specifies that those who harass or intimidate anyone in connection with loans by an unlicensed moneylender face a maximum fine of $40,000 or up to three years in jail, or both.

Enacting a law to criminalise without having effective safeguards against the hurdles that life throws at those that earn lower income is, to say the least, not thoughtful. The government should kick-start an initiative like “Match-Saving Scheme” to assist those that are least able to save before even considering a law which would criminalise those that borrow from the illegal money-lenders. The “Match-Saving Scheme” could be made available to those who earn $1500 or less and match 50 cents for every dollar saved. The “Match-Saving Scheme”, should also specify conditions as to when such savings could be drawn. Such a scheme will kick-start a saving habit among those who are often least likely and least able to save.

“Of course if given a choice, I don’t want to pay so much interest”, says Rezal. “But what choice do I have?” he asks.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28041.1

“The door is always open to him,” says Reform Party of chairman

“The door is always open to him,” says Reform Party of chairman

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

The following is the Reform Party’s latest press release on the resignation of its chairman, Mr Ng Teck Siong.

Press Release

The Reform Party can confirm that Mr. Ng Teck Siong, former Chairman of the Reform Party, submitted his resignation to the party’s Secretary General on Monday 26th April.

The senior officers and council of the CEC were saddened by the news but are fully supportive of Mr Ng’s decision that, “in the interest of party renewal, this is an appropriate juncture to step aside,”

Mr Ng is a veteran of opposition politics having being involved with different opposition parties for almost thirty years. His political career first began in 1980 when he joined the Singapore Democratic Party under the then SG Mr Chiam See Tong. In the last few years he has become well known as a trusted assistant to the late J.B. Jeyaretnam. Mr Ng Teck Siong was invited onto the Pro-Tem committee by JBJ during the early stages of The Reform Party’s inauguration and took over the helm of leadership following the death of JBJ in October 2008.

Mr Edmund Ng Chair of the reform Party denied rumours of any personal rift quoting an interview from MediaCorp’s ‘938 live’ yesterday where Mr K Jeyaretnam said, “Teck Siong has given many years of loyal service to my father and has done a good job of steering the party. It shouldn’t be taken as a reflection of anything bad on him. Just that the majority of the CEC felt it’s time for new blood.” The Chair went on to stress that the party is governed by CEC decisions not by any one individual.

Mr Jeyaretnam paid tribute to Mr Ng Teck Siong, praising him for stepping up and taking over at the helm at a very difficult time. “The door is always open to him”, he added.

The CEC, and the whole of the Reform Party, wishes Mr Ng continued good health and happiness and wishes him all the best in his future endeavours.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27986.3

Reform Party's sec-gen

April 28, 2009
Reform Party's sec-gen
By Kor Kian Beng & Jeremy Au Yong
Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam (above) now holds the same post that his father held before he died last September. -- AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

A MONTH after joining the fledgling Reform Party founded by his father, hedge fund manager Kenneth Jeyaretnam is now its secretary-general.

At the same time, a long-time ally of the late Mr J. B. Jeyaretnam and a co-founder of the party has quit after falling out with the younger Jeyaretnam.

The party issued a statement on Monday announcing the appointment of Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam as secretary-general, Mr Edmund Ng as interim chairman and Mr James Teo Kian Chye as interim treasurer.

The statement also announced the resignation of Mr Ng Teck Siong as chairman following a vote of no-confidence against him.

Mr Ng Teck Siong, a long-time ally of the senior Jeyaretnam, told The Straits Times he had quit the party completely.

Opposition sources say he fell out of favour because he was slow in appointing a new secretary-general, the post held by the senior Jeyaretnam before he died of heart failure last September, two months after setting up the party.

Contacted by telephone, the younger Jeyaretnam declined to elaborate on Mr Ng Teck Siong's ouster.

'I think the CEC (central executive committee) just felt that they needed somebody of higher profile to take the party forward,' he said.

As for his plans for the party, he said: 'Obviously our plan is to take the party forward and to contest the next election, to build on what has been achieved before.'

Mr Jeyaretnam is married and has a 12-year-old son. He worked in London's financial sector for many years before returning with his family to Singapore last April.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=26489.10

AWARE: Restore reason, civility to debate

April 28, 2009
AWARE SAGA
Restore reason, civility to debate

IN A climate of debate that has seen fear mongering, character assassination, heads of sub-committees sacked, employees fired, police called, votes of no confidence, churches weighing in and threats of violence, it is necessary to remind ourselves what being part of a civil society means.

A civil society is one where every citizen has an option to make her own life in a safe public sphere and where no one should be discriminated against or excluded because of her religion, class, race, sexuality, lifestyle, ideology or gender.

Given the political dominance of one party and Singapore's multicultural and multi-religious nature, groups like the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) are important for providing the expression of alternative views and hence for good governance.

The totality of Aware's work and the make-up of every executive committee (exco) since its formation are representative of a 'rainbow coalition'. However, and somewhat unfortunately, the current exco does not represent Singapore's racial and religious diversity. In that sense, one wonders to what degree it best represents civil society.

The second question is what are the tones and sensibilities of civil society? This is a far harder question to answer. But we have had clear, if unspoken, codes of conduct at Aware for many years. These codes have been replaced by mistrust, betrayal, misinformation and silence.

In this regard, character assassination of individuals shows the extent to which people will descend to sell their point of view. Misinformation about me is being circulated by text messages and the Internet that I have a homosexual brother and am working to turn Aware into a gay/lesbian organisation.

My maiden name is D'Cruz and my full married name is Thurairasingam and so Clarence Singam cannot be my brother (see http://sg.christianpost.com/dbase/society/1548/122336/3.htm ) .

I have emphasised that Aware will not be used as a platform for lesbian issues. I have stated categorically that Aware speaks for all women and we address issues of discrimination against all women. These are facts that can easily be verified. But facts are a casualty in this whole sad episode.

We must restore a sense of reason, civility and respect to a debate that is increasingly unproductive. This will surely be good, not just for Aware but for all women, families and Singaporeans.

In that sense, I am grateful for the statement by Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports, in yesterday's report, 'Keep religion above 'petty politics', says Vivian'.

Constance Singam (Mrs)

FORUM NOTE: The writer was president of Aware before the society's AGM last month. She quit as its adviser following the fallout between veterans of the society and the new executive committee, comprising largely new members led by Ms Josie Lau.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.2

Aware: What being inclusive means

What being inclusive means

I REFER to yesterday's article, 'Keep religion above 'petty politics', says Vivian'.

The Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) fully supports Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Vivian Balakrishnan's advice that our internal disputes should be settled among members. We agree it is important to hear a diversity of views and to discuss these views in a civil manner.

Aware is a secular organisation and we welcome women of all races and religions to be members. Our members' beliefs and the recent high-profile disputes should not be exploited in the public arena to serve controversial agendas.

The extraordinary general meeting on May 2 is a forum for genuinely interested parties to address issues relating to Aware, its contribution to matters relating to all women and how this affects society in general.

Aware's principle of inclusiveness is framed by reference to the purposes and objectives of this women's organisation. For example, Aware is not directly concerned with the rights of consumers, investors or the environment.

What about the interests of lesbians or what some call 'sexual orientation' or 'sexuality' rights? It depends on what interest is at stake. For example, we do not think lesbians should be discriminated against in the workplace, either in terms of promotion or pay; like every woman, they deserve equality of opportunity. The only relevant consideration is merit.

There is a world of difference between fair employment rights and claims to 'same-sex marriage'.

As an advocacy group, Aware seeks to maintain its relevance by allocating its limited resources to tackling the most pressing issues of the day impacting our women across the spectrum of society.

It is not helpful to use slogans like 'inclusive' to force acceptance of controversial claims on all Aware members, as if that belief were a prerequisite for membership; it is not.

Aware would like to contribute to pluralistic Singapore by providing a forum to address issues specifically so we can understand exactly what issues are at stake in order for dialogue to be meaningful. Aware is tolerant and inclusive enough to allow its members to hold their views on matters of controversy.

Josie Lau (Ms)
President of Aware

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.1

Hanging herself with her own rope?

Hanging herself with her own rope?

SINGAPORE - It was only last week when Dr Thio Su Mien made the following claims regarding AWARE’s comprehensive sexuality (CSE) program especially with regards to her focus on the neutral portrayal of homosexuality:

‘I talked to parents. I said: You better do something about this, otherwise your daughter will come back and say, ‘Mum, I want to marry my girlfriend.’

‘Or your son will say: ‘Dad, I want to marry my boyfriend.”

These parents were flabbergasted, she said, adding that such sexuality education was taking place in the United States and Europe and was not new.

‘What is happening in society is that we are redefining marriage, we are redefining families,’ she said.

‘So I’m a concerned citizen and if people are so ignorant, I think I want to teach them.’

Pointing out that Aware’s programme was already in 30 schools, she said: ‘The suggestion is that in this programme, young girls from 12 to 18 are taught that it’s okay to experiment with each other.

‘And this is something which should concern parents in Singapore. Are we going to have an entire generation of lesbians?’

I was anticipating a response from the Ministry of Education (MOE), and my prediction finally came true. Allow me to kick things off with an elaboration on how MOE-affiliated schools work based on my experience in running workshops in schools, though not in the area of sexuality education. From time to time, schools may decide to run workshops by external bodies or personnels not within the educational service. Such workshops are usually not part of the examinable content within the mandatory syllabus, but are organized to equip students with useful knowledge. Prior to such workshops, the lesson plans and teaching materials are reviewed by the teachers, department heads or their assistants. Thus, any objectionable material will be siphoned out. This review process is meant to ensure that the materials covered during the workshop adhered to set guidelines. MOE was spot on in its reply to queries on AWARE’s CSE, especially on the part in ensuring that the latter adheres to religious sensitivity guidelines. And, it is a norm for other guidelines to be enforced too, such as racial sensitivity.

If a typical man in the street were to read Dr Thio’s statements, he may interpret it in the following way 1) Schools that run AWARE’s CSE promote homosexuality and lesbianism. 2) It seems that MOE is also advocating the promotion of homosexuality and lesbianism in such schools since they are MOE-affiliated. 3) Or MOE isn’t in control of the curriculum and may not have a proper guideline on sexuality education.

Whilst seeking to demolish the old AWARE’s CSE program, what Dr Thio had done at the same time was to cast aspersions on our education service indirectly. She never said it directly, but the inferences can be made. This is a rope she has tried to use to “hang” the old AWARE. But this indirect attack on the education establishment will prompt a response from the latter.

Thus, it didn’t come as a surprise that MOE came out to issue its stand on sexuality education in schools that run AWARE’s workshops. It has also requested Dr Thio to come up with facts to substantiate her claims:

“Last year, 11 secondary schools engaged AWARE to run workshops for their students. The number of students involved in each school ranged from about 20 to 100, and each workshop lasted 3 hours. The objectives of these workshops were to provide students with accurate information on Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)/HIV, to help students understand the consequences of premarital sexual activity, and to equip students with skills such as decision-making and resisting negative peer pressure.

AWARE also conducted assembly talks, typically of 45-minute duration, for students in a few secondary schools. Some of the areas covered in the talks included body image, self-esteem, eating disorders, teenage pregnancies, sexual harassment and the role of women in today’s context.

The schools that engaged AWARE found that the content and messages of the sessions conducted were appropriate for their students and adhered to guidelines to respect the values of different religious groups. The schools did not receive any negative feedback from students or parents who attended the workshops and talks.

In particular, MOE has also not received any complaint from parents or Dr Thio Su Mien, who was reported to have made specific claims about sexuality education in our schools. MOE has contacted Dr Thio Su Mien to seek clarifications and facts to substantiate her claims.”

Thus, Dr Thio has gotten into some sort of a sticky situation with a government institution with the latter’s disavowal of her claims. Based on the information provided firstly by the old AWARE members and now corroborated by MOE, it is unlikely that Dr Thio is able to substantiate her claims. In other words, she may be hanging herself with the same rope she used to hang the old AWARE.

In light of the new developments, what does that mean for the EOGM? It appears that the anti-homosexuality and anti-lesbianism stance of the new exco and Dr Thio is now becoming some sort of baggage for them. A continual grip on that baggage might prove to be their undoing. And due to the situation with MOE that Dr Thio has gotten herself into, it would seem prudent that the new AWARE exco should start distancing themselves from her. But wouldn’t that mean they would be without a mentor? If they distance themselves from their mentor, would they end up like headless chickens? The build-up to the EOGM on 2nd May is getting interesting by the day.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.141

Health Minister Says So-Called Swine Flu May be Man Made

Health Minister Says So-Called Swine Flu May be Man Made
Posted: 2009/04/28
From: Mathaba

The North American Influenza (or United States Flu) which is wrongly being called `Swine Flu` is apparently man made as pointed out on independent media networks, and Indonesia`s Health Minister confirms this possibility thus showing true credentials to protect Indonesians

Mathaba.Net - The recent outbreak of so-called Swine Flu has been revealed in several articles on this and other independent news networks, to be man-made according to various experts.

This is not the first time attempts to start a man-made pandemic have been launched, with HIV, Bird Flu, so-called Mad Cow Disease, and Syphilis among other diseases, all having been deliberately spread by Anglo-American military `research` laboratories.

Singapore and other Asian news networks have reported the cautious remarks of Indonesia's Health Minister Siti Fadilah Supari as she said on Tuesday that deadly swine flu virus could have been man-made. She urged calm over its spread around the world.

She has said that Western governments could be making and spreading viruses in the developing world to boost pharmaceutical companies' profits. It is well known that senior members of the United States former administration such as Donald Rumsfeld have massive shares in vaccines such as the avian bird flu vaccination.

"I'm not sure whether the virus was genetically engineered but it's a possibility," she told reporters at a press conference called to reassure the public over the government's response to the swine flu threat.

No cases of the disease have been reported in Indonesia, the country worst hit by the bird flu virus which has killed about 250 people worldwide since 2003.

Indonesian authorities have increased body temperature scanners at airports and banned imports of live pigs and pork products, amid World Health Organisation (WHO) warnings of a pandemic.

Supari, a cardiologist, also claimed that the H1N1 strain of swine flu, which is believed to have killed more than 150 people in Mexico, could not survive in tropical countries like Indonesia.

"We have to be alert at all times although swine flu in Indonesia is not a cause for panic," she said.

"H1N1 survives in countries with four seasons. The type A H1N1 virus hopefully won't be able to sustain itself once it enters the tropical climate of Indonesia," she added.

The virus has been found in 11 countries including Mexico, the United States and Spain, while several other countries from Colombia to New Zealand are investigating suspected cases.

Supari said the health ministry had prepared 100 hospitals to handle swine flu cases should the disease enter Indonesia.

The minister has refused since 2006 to share all but a handful of Indonesia's bird flu virus samples with WHO researchers, saying the system is being abused by rich countries to develop profitable vaccines which poor countries must buy.

It is also well-known among informed circles that the WHO itself was responsible for the spread of AIDS to Africa and South East Asia via contaminated vaccines in the 1980's.

World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) says “swine flu” is an inaccurate name for the virus that has sickened nearly 2,000 people in Mexico and 40 people in the United States. The OIE says it is more accurate to call it the “North American Flu”, identifying it geographically, because the new virus has characteristics of swine, avian and human virus components and has NOT been identified in any animals thus far.

The OIE calls for immediate scientific research to determine how susceptible animals would be to the new virus and if any additional biosecurity measures should take place, including possible vaccination of any susceptible animals. The OIE says any positive research findings should ONLY lead to trade protection measures of pigs in the areas of countries where human cases have been confirmed.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. (FAO) is working to determine if the H1N1 flu virus has any connection to pigs. So far, none has been found.

Western controlled media networks have spread the misinformation and misnomer concerning swine flu, which will lead the world's population to the wrong conclusion. "Whilst the man-made killer disease may be made by human swines, the animal pigs have yet to catch it" an observer noted.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28092.1

Swine flu 'beyond containment'

Swine flu 'beyond containment'

"Border controls do not work. Screening doesn't work," WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said in Geneva.
The swine flu crisis has deepened with the death toll mounting above 150 in Mexico and at least 16 countries reporting confirmed or suspected infections.
The World Health Organisation warned meanwhile that the virus is now too "widespread to make containment a feasible" strategy.

Mexico, epicenter of the outbreak, said 152 people were now believed to have died from swine flu with more than 1,600 people suspected to be carrying the virus. Twenty of the deaths have been confirmed by laboratory tests.

The number of confirmed cases in the United States more than doubled to 44 and Britain and Spain both said they had registered patients sick with swine flu, the first cases in Europe.

Canada has six cases and Israel and New Zealand confirmed their first swine flu casualties.

Suspected victims were being kept under surveillance from Australia (70 cases) to Sweden and Switzerland which had five each.
While countries tightened borders, the WHO said research since the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome outbreak in 2003 in Asia had shown that border controls were of little use halting the spread of such a virus.

"Border controls do not work. Screening doesn't work," WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said in Geneva.

"If a person has been exposed or infected... the person might not be symptomatic at the airport," he said. "We learn as we go on. SARS was a huge learning experience for all of us."

WHO assistant general secretary Keiji Fukuda warned on Monday that the virus would be impossible to contain.
"I think that in this age of global travel where people move around in airplanes so quickly, there is no region to which this virus could not spread," said Fukuda.

Fukuda said that WHO experts decided at a WHO meeting on Monday that the virus is too "widespread to make containment a feasible" strategy and that the UN health agency did not recommend closing borders or restricting travel.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered a meeting of the government's top emergency preparations committee on to discuss the swine flu crisis.

"Swine flu is an international problem now, it's crossed two continents, it's got to be dealt with by international agreements," said Brown.

In Asia, South Korea said it was investigating one suspected infection, while at least three people have been confirmed as New Zealand's first swine flu cases but 10 are assumed to have caught the virus, Health Minister Tony Ryall said.

WHO officials in China said they were investigating several people with suspicious symptoms, but played down the chances that any were likely infected.

Japan said it would temporarily tighten visa restrictions for Mexican nationals as part of efforts to stop the virus entering the country.

It also booked 500 hotel rooms near Tokyo's Narita airport in case infected travellers need to be quaratined, Jiji Press news agency reported.

An Israeli man recently returned from Mexico has been confirmed to have contracted the Middle East's first case of swine flu, Israeli military radio reported.

Dmitry Lvov, head of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Virology, said that the risk of a worldwide pandemic "is very high. It could reach Russia in a week."

"It all depends on whether the new countries affected can contain its development," said Lvov.

Australian authorities said Tuesday they were investigating 70 possible cases of swine flu and cautioned against travel to Mexico.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd vowed to devote "all necessary resources" to the evolving flu threat, as possible cases of the disease more than doubled, covering all but one of the country's states and territories.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon warned the new multi-strain virus, which is believed to be a mix of a human flu virus and an avian flu that first came from swine, risked triggering a global pandemic.

"We are concerned that this virus could cause a new influenza pandemic. It could be mild in its effect or potentially be severe," Ban told reporters.
"We don't know yet which way it will go but we are concerned that in Mexico most of those who died were young and healthy adults."

Fears the virus disease could further hit the struggling global economy spooked investors, with stocks in Europe's leading markets sliding in opening trade, following sharp losses in Asia.

Oil prices suffered new falls amid worries that the outbreak would hurt air travel and hit demand.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.10

Swine Flu Update

Swine Flu Update

* The World Health Organization (WHO) has raised its alert level over swine flu from three to four - two steps short of declaring a full pandemic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8021827.stm
.
* First case of swine flu was reported on 13 April 2009.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8021827.stm
.
* Affected so far…
Mexico: 26 confirmed cases (Mexico puts suspected deaths at 149, more than 1,600 suspected cases)
United States: 40 confirmed cases
Canada: 6 confirmed cases
Spain: 1 confirmed case
UK: Scotland says tests confirm 2 cases
Israel, Brazil, Guatemala, Peru, Australia and New Zealand: Suspected cases being tested
.
* There are antiviral drugs, including Tamiflu, that have been shown to be effective, but they need to be taken within days of the first symptoms.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/04/27/health/main4970352.shtml


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.8

Steer Clear

Steer Clear

A few days ago, I commented on the AWARE saga. One thing I will say about the saga is that the Singapore government did the right thing by not intervening in it; it is a policy I think they should continue.

Despite some internet chatter that the New Guard is a political conspiracy, anyone with half a brain knows that it is nonsense. Why would the Singapore government bother with AWARE when they can just ignore them? So I’m quite perturbed when I read that Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Vivian Balakrishnan had commented on the AWARE saga as he warned the two warring groups "keep religion above the fray of petty politics".

Although he interjected that the Singapore government has no intention of intervening in the AWARE saga, as a government minister his words will still represent the government. As I said earlier, I do not believe the Singapore government should get involved in a strictly internal matter within AWARE. To me, this is an issue between 2 groups of women with vastly different views. Despite what people may say about the New Guard stealth takeover of AWARE, I think everyone will agree that their stand against homosexuality is more in line with Singapore society than teaching homosexuality as ‘neutral’ (whatever the hell that means).

The AWARE saga is something that only members of AWARE can clear up and I strongly believe that the Singapore government should steer clear of the whole mess.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27958.12

Singapore’s ‘Culture Wars’: Fragmenting Politics

Singapore’s ‘Culture Wars’: Fragmenting Politics

liberal_boy1Every Singaporean longs for the day when ‘race’ and ‘religion’ cease to be markers of difference in society. And to a large extent they have. For most post-1965 Singaporeans, the politics of ‘race’ and ‘religion’ are but ancient and anecdotal lessons hermeneutically sealed in history textbooks unlike the stark realities of a bygone era their parents grew up in. Through a combination of stern warnings from the People’s Action Party (PAP) government and institutions like the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act of 1991, race and religion have never played a significant role in civil society or electoral politics since independence. That’s the good news.

The not-so-bad news is that new issues have emerged over the last decade or so to replace the traditional faultlines of ‘race’ and ‘religion’. A growing list of hot button issues like homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, the casinos, censorship and so on, has become integral to the politics of identity in contemporary Singapore. These hot-button issues have a tendency to divide Singaporeans, irrespective of age, gender or ethnicity, based on their ideological worldview of these lifestyle choices.

Such politics of division are, of course, not new. The American ‘culture wars’ first caught the popular imagination when presidential hopeful Pat Buchanan delivered his famous campaign speech to the Republican National Convention in 1992. Referring to liberal ideologies over controversial issues as abortion, affirmative action, and arts funding, Buchanan urged Republicans to declare “a war for the nation’s soul.” In his book Culture Wars: The Struggle for America, sociologist James Davison Hunter examined the phenomenon as the struggle between the ‘orthodox’ (conservative or traditional) and ‘progressive’ (liberal or modern) camps in spheres of interests like law, education, arts, the family, and politics. For Hunter, the ‘culture wars’ were unlike conventional religious and cultural conflicts that historically divided the nation between the religious and the secular but along ‘orthodox’ and ‘progressive’ ideological worldviews that cut across established moral and religious communities.

These hot button issues are complex because they contain a wide variety of polarities. Take the AWARE saga for example. The conflict currently playing out is not just a straightforward struggle between the pro-gay and anti-gay camps, but also between orthodox and progressive Christians, not to mention between civic secularists and cultural conservatives. The 2007 debate over Section 377A of the Penal Code was similarly complex. The casino debate in 2004 was also more than a conflict between religious and non-religious people but also between moral conservatives and cultural libertarians, and between conservative economists and economic pragmatists. On the immediate horizon is the workshop on so-called ‘end-of-life’ issues by the euthanasia expert Philip Nitschke to be held next month. Dr Nitschke, head of Exit International, a centre that promotes euthanasia, will speak on concerns such as advanced medical directives and will be sure to provoke a backlash.

Simply put, as Singapore confirms its status as a global city, as it engages with the growing influx of ideas and institutions, it will be increasingly become more fragmented along ‘orthodox’ and ‘progressive’ worldviews which, in turn, have a multitude of agenda and interests behind them.

This is why Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Vivian Balakrishnan’s recent observation in the wake of the AWARE saga misses the point. He was quoted in the local media as saying:

If you allow these single issues [the gay issue] to dominate and hijack your agenda, I think you are not going succeed and it’s going to be counter productive.

But such ‘single issues’ are both deep and wide in terms of the agenda behind them. 377A and the casino debate were also ‘single issues’ that carried deeply held beliefs by a wide variety of camps. These hot button issues are not ‘single issues’ or one-off debates but symptoms of an on-going conflict between orthodoxy and progressives.

This conflict may not necessarily be a bad thing. These hot button issues will make policy-decisions more complicated. It will make Singapore politics more sophisticated because the PAP will have to speak to a variety of constituents and decide which to court. There would be more bargaining and negotiating as the ruling party will have no choice but to bear in mind the deeply held values of a wide array of people. This fragmentation of identities will lead to a fragmentation of politics.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.140

Singapore-based company collaborating with company owned by Burmese drug lord to build Myanmar’s new airport

Singapore-based company collaborating with company owned by Burmese drug lord to build Myanmar’s new airport

Myanmar’s military government is constructing a new international airport in the administrative capital Naypyidaw that will be able to handle 10.5 million passengers a year. (Source: AFP)

The project is handled jointly by private company Asia World and Singapore-based CPG Consultants which drew up the blueprints:

What’s so unusual about this business collaboration between a Burmese and Singapore company?

The Chairman of Asia World is Lo Hsing Han, a former Burmese drug trafficker and present-day major Burmese business tycoon, with financial ties to Singapore.

In June 1992, he founded the Asia World Company, allegedly as a front for his drug operations. His son, Steven Law (aka Tun Myint Naing), married to Cecilia Ng of Singapore in 1996, runs the company which won many multimillion-dollar contracts in the construction and energy sectors. (source: Wikipedia)

Although Singapore is proud of its mandatory death penalty for small-time narcotics smugglers and heroin addicts, both father and son travel freely in and out of the friendly island-nation. “The family money is offshore,” said a high-level US narcotics official. “The old man is a convicted drug trafficker, so his kid is handling the financial activities.” (source: Burma-Singapore axis)

Singapore’s ventures with Asia World include both government and private investments. Kuok Singapore Ltd., a partner with Asia World in many ventures, was Burma’s largest single real estate investor as of late 1996, with over $650 million invested. 20 Other Singaporean companies are mentioned in Asia Worlds company reports.

In February 2008, the US Treasury placed economic sanctions on Steven Law, his father, Lo Hsing Han, and his wife, Cecilia Ng, as well as various companies in which they are involved, calling them “key financial operatives of the Burmese regime”. (source: DPA)

CPF Consultants is formerly known as the Public Works Department prior to its corporatization in 1999 and was owned by Temasek Holdings:

(Source: CPG Corp)

In 2003, CPG was sold by Temasek Holdings to Australia’s Downer EDI for $131 million dollars. It is not known if Temasek retained any shares in CPG after the transaction.

Singapore is the second largest foreign investor in Myanmar after Thailand. Besides CPG, a host of other Singapore companies including Government-linked companies have considerable business interests in Myanmar.

Collectively known as Singapore Inc, they gather around the $150 billion state-owned investment house Temasek Holdings, controlled by Singapore’s long-ruling Lee family.

With an estimated $3 billion invested in Burma (and more than $20 billion in Australia), Singapore Inc companies have been some of the biggest investors in and supporters of Burma’s military junta - this while its Government, on the rare times it is asked, gently suggests a softly-softly diplomatic approach toward the junta.

Singaporean government companies, such as the arms supplier Singapore Technologies has sent guns, rockets, armoured personnel carriers and grenade launchers to the blood-thirsty military junta of Myanmar. (read report here)

Many Western countries either ban or discourage investment in Myanmar as a way of pressuring its ruling junta to improve its poor human rights record and hand over power to a democratically elected government.

In contrast, Singapore has long advocated engagement with the military junta. Over the years, Singapore companies have invested heavily especially in the oil and energy sector of Myanmar.

A Singapore Association of Myanmar was set up in 1993 “to assist and provide channels of support among
Singapore companies and interests in Myanmar.”

Given the close economic ties between the two nations, it is little wonder that Singapore has an orchid named after Myanmar Prime Minister Thein Sein (read here).

Will Lo Hsing Han be rewarded one day with an orchid’s name or medal for his efforts in promoting Myanmar-Singapore relations and trade?

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28082.1