Friday, May 8, 2009

John Lui shares his views on the Aware saga.

Get your values out of my face
May 08, 2009 Friday, 11:42 AM
John Lui shares his views on the Aware saga.

GET your values out of my elite uncaring face.

If there is one lesson that the Aware saga has proven yet again, it is that parents have an inflated sense of their own worth in society.

I am not married and do not have children and it has irritated me for a long time that mothers and fathers like to excuse their incredibly selfish behaviour by saying "it's for the sake of the kids".


http://blogs.straitstimes.com/2009/5/8/get-your-values-out-of-my-elite-uncaring-face

The group of pro-values parents who object to a factual and comprehensive sex eduation programme should be reminded that their little darlings belong to the same society that I do.

If these little angels as a result of ignorant fornication foist little bundles of joy on society and its taxpayers, I for one will be more than a little displeased.

In my eyes, having teenagers with fully functioning reproductive organs and not being able to control them is similar to owning a pit bull with big teeth and not putting it on a leash. Both creatures are hazards to other people.

If you tell me that your pit bull's fondness for sinking his fangs into people is "a private matter between a dog and his owner", I would tell you to grow a brain, you selfish, ignorant fool.

And if you campaign to keep leashes off dangerous dogs, then you are more than a fool, you are a menace to society.

Your right to keep your pet unrestrained ends where the skin of my leg begins.

Your rights to keep your child ignorant about sex ends where my tax dollars start to fund public medical programmes for STDs, juvenile delinquency schemes and prisons for people screwed up by being born to poor teenage mothers.

In the pages of The Straits Times over the last four weeks, we have seen upper-middle class professionals, driven by private religious impulses, strive to change public education policy.

People from well-off, educated families are the ones who are statistically the least likely to suffer from the problems of teen pregnancy and STDs. Yet they feel driven to restrict sex education for the people who need it most: Teens from lower-income families.

But it makes sense. After all, the harm that these well-meaning people could cause will never affect them directly. They get to feel holy but will never experience the misery born of their actions.

Singapore was born of pragmatism. Legalised prostitution protects women in the sex trade from pimps. No-one likes prostitution but greater misery comes from driving it underground.

Teenage sexual behaviour is a public health issue, like swine flu or dengue fever.

The next time someone tells me that sex education is a private matter between a parent and his child, I will tell him that in return, I will make open containers filled with stagnant water a private matter between myself and the stuff I keep on my property.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.265

How serious was yeseterday’s Treasury auction?

How serious was yeseterday’s Treasury auction?

May 8th, 2009
By
David Goldman

A prominent economist writes today that he has taken his personal money out of dollars and put it into Australian and Canadian dollars, the commodity currencies. The sloppy 30-year auction today, he believes, is a true crack in the dam.

I am less certain: my core view is that America will undergo something closer to the Japanese scenario, in which economic growth stays extremely low, asset price deflation does not reverse, short-term rates stay close to zero, savings rates remain elevated, and bond yields stay low. All that has happened since March is that the end-of-the-world premium has been taken out of the Treasury market.

Remember that credit protection on the United State of America reached 75 basis points in early March — that’s where protection on Brazil was trading pre-crisis. It’s now down to “only” 35 basis points, given the success of the Fed’s and Treasury’s efforts to refloat bank equity with a few trillions of dollars of liquidity.

What the Federal Reserve and Treasury have set in motion is the mother of all crowdings-out. The Fed is compelled to buy substantial amounts of Treasuries to prevent the federal deficit from turning into a $1.8 trillion black hole that sucks in all the free savings of the world and then sum. The moment that yields start to rise, the stock market reacts negatively. There is no “give” in the economy for any substantial rise in yields: the penalty to growth expectations is exacted immediately.

By ballooning the deficit and tying the credit of the United States to the balance sheet of the banking system, the Fed has avoided panic, but has crippled the economy for the long term. There is no way to finance the deficit except by suppressing financing for everyone else. The massive amount of liquidity created by the Fed has no inflationary effect as long as the market does not wan to hold real assets — and it will not as long as the federal government sucks up the available savings. The most like scenario is a paralytic, zombie-like stasis.

The major commodity indices still remain close to their lows with an modest uptick reflecting the mildest hopes for recovery.

Red=UBS, Yellow=GSCI, Green=CRB, Blue=ROgers
Red=UBS, Yellow=GSCI, Green=CRB, Blue=ROgers

source: Bloomberg

To get a run out of bonds into hard assets, first people must want to own hard assets rather than locked-in cash flows. I just don’t see it for the next couple of years.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28623.1

When meeting the people’s session becomes an occupational hazard

When meeting the people’s session becomes an occupational hazard

SINGAPORE - One MP got punched and was subsequently set on fire in an unfortunate incident. Another received threats of a physical assault by phone. Recently, a 17-year-old was arrested for hurling a chair at the glass door of an MP office.

What do the above antagonists have in common? Frustration, perhaps. The first one was a cabbie who was unhappy over the lack of assistance in reinstating his revoked license. The other was frustrated over the fact that he has not been receiving financial assistance from the Central Community Development Council (CDC). The other simple lost his cool after a meeting session with the MP.

It was apparent from reports that the above assailants have been afflicted with some sort of unsound mind based on their history at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) or had some form of intellectual handicap in the case of the 17-year-old who was reported to have a low IQ. It is quite tempting to attribute such assaults or nearly assaults to the mental capacities of the perpetuators. But one shouldn’t lose track of the larger picture - effects of the political culture of the ruling party and the savviness of their candidates in dealing with the ground that comes in all forms.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that people who need help from their MP are already at their last vestige of desperation. Obviously, a person who has been doing grassroots work and administering to such people for a long time would be able to cope with such desperate souls. An attitude of wanting to help the downtrodden ones is a definite must-have.

What does the political culture of the ruling PAP have to do with this? Senior Minister Mr Goh Chok Tong admitted that the purpose of the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) is to serve as a platform to bring top talents who are potential ministerial material into the government.

“They also contribute to Singapore’s political stability, by ‘helping us to recruit younger and capable candidates with the potential to become ministers.”
- The Straits Times, in an interview with Mr Goh

And Mr Goh further added that such candidates wanted the guarantee of winning their first election if they were to make their first foray into politics.

“Without some assurance of a good chance of winning at least their first election, many able and successful young Singaporeans may not risk their careers to join politics.”
- Mr Goh, in the aforementioned interview

Thus, if a particular candidate has not received his baptism of fire in working with the desperate and downtrodden, but is instead parachuted into such a position by the mechanics of a GRC contest, one really wonders if the latter can effectively tend to the desperate and downtrodden residents in his ward. Yes, apologists for the ruling party may be tempted to point to the fact that these assailants have a diminished capacity to control their rage. Then, would one expect the ground to be free of such people? The ground is populated with people of varying mental and intellectual capacities, and the reality is that the MP of the ward must also deal with the ones whose capacities are deemed to be ‘aberrant’. If such people have violent tendencies, how come our ‘much maligned’ (at least from the mainstream media’s perspective) members of the opposition have not received such treatment? Opposition parties like the Singapore Democratic Party, Worker’s Party and the Singapore Democratic Alliance have been walking the ground and surely they must be exposed to such people. Thus, it is only by working the ground can one be savvy in dealing with all types of people, including those with ‘limited capacities’.

I remembered a memorable quote from the movie Spiderman, which was an advice from Uncle Ben to Peter Parker AKA Spiderman:”With great power, comes great responsibility”. The pertinent question is - are those in power well-equipped enough to take on such great responsibilities?

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28492.8

Christian Coup Foiled in Singapore Women's Club

Christian Coup Foiled in Singapore Women's Club
Written by Ben Bland
Friday, 08 May 2009

Women's associations are usually thought of as dull social clubs for the retired and others with far too much time on their hands. For the last 25 years, Singapore main women's body - the Association of Women for Action and Research, or Aware - was seen in a similar light and few Singaporeans had even heard of it.

But an abortive coup by a group of anti-gay fundamentalist Christians has thrown the organization center stage, in the process revealing the growing clout of Singapore's online activists, and the surprising strength of civil society.

The saga has pushed the boundaries of public discourse in Singapore, where discussions about homosexuality are normally taboo, in the process attracting the close attention of senior government ministers and Singapore's largest bank, DBS. The government has always maintained an uneasy balance over religion, allowing plenty of it as long as it doesn't get too fervent. In the 1980s, the government cracked down on a group of Catholic activists and threw them in jail. It has nailed the odd Islamic extremist here and there and arrested them. It has taken a largely tolerant attitude towards sex despite the island's conservative image. There are plenty of prostitutes and transvestites plying the streets without visible intimidation although Immigration seizes the obvious foreign entrants and sends them back to wherever they come from.

However, fundamentalist American-style mega-churches that peddle a heady mix of religion, showbiz and virulent social conservatism have been gaining strength. Taking the kind of approach to indoctrination normally employed by Communist insurgents or Al-Qaeda operatives, these churches eschew traditional Bible reading sessions in favor of "cells". They make explicit attacks on homosexuality, claiming in defiance of all medical expertise and any notion of equality and common sense that it can and should be "cured." And they also usually pay their pastors big bucks.

Singapore's Church of Our Saviour, housed in an old cinema west of the city center, is one such organization and it is from within this church that the plot was hatched to seize control of Aware. Led by a 70-year-old lawyer called Thio Su Mien, a group of born-again Christians had become frustrated with the way that, as they saw it, Aware was promoting homosexuality and lesbianism through its sex education programs.

To most observers, there was nothing even remotely controversial about Aware promoting tolerance, informed choice and safe sex to Singaporean youngsters. But to hectoring, self-styled moral guardians like Thio and her cohort it was unacceptable, so they decided to secretly seize control of the group. Using classic sleeper tactics, scores of women from the fundamentalist Christian community were urged to join Aware ahead of its annual general meeting at the end of March. The born-again Christian soldiers followed orders faithfully and to the consternation of Aware stalwarts, six unknowns – who it would later emerge were all members of the Church of Our Saviour acting under the mentorship of Thio – were elected to the executive committee and several well-respected female rights activists voted off.

But, in the days that followed, the anti-gay cabal refused to show their hand and most Aware members remained unaware, so to speak, of the true nature of the remarkable coup that had just taken place.

As rumblings of discontent about the takeover started to seep out from the old guard, as the ousted members became known, it was Singaporean bloggers and online citizen journalists who started to unravel the murky details of the plot.

They found out that several of the new members of the Aware board regularly attended the Church of Our Saviour, which offers "counseling and spiritual help for those who want to be set free from homosexual thoughts, tendencies and practices," and also revealed that some of these women had had letters published in local newspapers that made their anti-gay views clear.

The story was still largely confined to a handful of blogs and websites, with little interest shown outside of Singapore's community of determined, if sometimes conspiracy-obsessed, netizens. That changed when DBS took the extremely unusual step of publicly rebuking one of its senior executives, Josie Lau, another Church of Our Saviour attendee, after she was chosen to be president of the new Aware executive committee.

Like other blue chip companies in Singapore, DBS likes to keep tabs on what its senior executives get up to in their free time and the bank claimed that Lau had run for office against its advice. DBS stressed that it was concerned about the extra pressure that the new role would put on Ms Lau. But many saw another explanation for DBS' nervousness: last year, the bank came under fire after the credit card marketing division, headed by Ms Lau, launched a charity campaign whose beneficiary was Focus On The Family, an evangelical American group known for its anti-gay views.

Even as further evidence of the coup continued to emerge, Ms Lau and the other new Aware executives continued to insist that they had no secret agenda and that they had not known each other before being elected.

But once they had pushed the boundaries of popular disbelief to their limits, Thio finally came clean in a hastily-arranged press conference, revealing that she had, in fact, been behind the coup. While the women had not known each other, she had operated as their "feminist mentor" and convinced them to take control of Aware in order to reverse its supposed support for homosexuality.

It was only once all this information was out in the open that it became clear what a spectacular own-goal Thio and her mentees had scored by deploying such underhand tactics.

Public opinion began to turn against the group and hundreds of women joined Aware to voice their opposition to the new guard at an extraordinary general meeting that the old guard had called. The membership of Aware swelled from 300 to 3,000 in a matter of weeks as both sides prepared to fight it out.

The government of Singapore, as it usually does, also felt the need to get involved, with a number of cabinet ministers warning both sides not to advance their religion or their views on sexuality in a way that would threaten Singapore's delicate social balance. These were not just empty words from a government that, while respecting freedom of religion for the most part, has always taken a dim view of religious groups becoming too aggressively involved in social issues. The Jehovah's Witnesses and the Moonies' Unification Church have been outlawed because they are deemed a threat to social stability.

At a riotous EGM last weekend, the Aware old guard triumphed with the anti-gay plotters eventually resigning after losing a vote of no confidence. But they are continuing their fight and have convinced the ministry of education to suspend the use of a sex education manual produced by Aware.

As the dust settles, the government and the handful of opposition politicians in Singapore will be taking note. This sort of divisive public battle for control of a civil society group is unprecedented in the normally quiescent city-state. It is far from the clear that this activism will translate into the stale sphere of Singaporean politics, where the ruling People's Action Party has won every election since independence with an overwhelming majority.

However, one thing is clear. Empowered by the freedom of communicating through the internet and fueled by a deep sense of justice and tolerance, people power (of sorts) has finally arrived in Singapore.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.227

Mas Selamat: Who gets the credit?

The capture:
Who gets the credit?
Kastari’s arrest and the claim for top credits: Who provided the crucial intelligence, and when will he be returned to Singapore? Commentary. By Seah Chiang Nee.
May 8, 2009

That the dangerous Mas Selamat Kastari is back in custody is good news for Southeast Asia, and a testimony of Singapore-Malaysia cooperation.

But it seems to have resulted in the controlled media of the two countries giving different slants of the arrest, so we'll have to wait for the official versions to know the truth.

Here are some of the conflicting versions reported in their largest newspapers - The Star and The Straits Times – apparently after talking to official sources.

(1) Joint operation?

Straits Times: Sources told The Straits Times that Mas Selamat was tracked down based on intelligence provided by Singapore’s Internal Security Department (ISD), and a joint operation by Malaysia and Singapore’s security agencies eventually led to his arrest.

The Star: The fugitive, who escaped from a Singapore maximum security detention centre (with two other suspects) was arrested in Johor by Malaysian Special Branch officers with the help of other police departments here. No mention of a joint operation with Singapore.

Who is right? Was it a joint operation or a Malaysian one? For consideration: it is possible that the Malaysians do not want to tell their people that Singaporean Special branch was operating with them in Johor - if indeed it did happen.

(2) Intelligence gathering

Straits Times: Sources told The Straits Times that Mas Selamat was tracked down based on intelligence provided by Singapore’s ISD.

The Star: The sharing of information between three countries - Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia - has led to the arrest of Kastari who was hiding in Johor.

Translation: Unlike the Straits Times report, intelligence had not come from Singapore alone, but from Indonesia as well.

In addition there’s also the reward of S$1 million - offered for information leading to Kastari’s capture - to consider. Who will get it?

‘Return to Singapore’

There are potential obstacles to remove before Kastari can eb returned to continue his detention in Singapore.

While Singapore's government-controlled Channel News Asia (CNA) reported that Kastari is likely "to be returned to Singapore soon" the Malaysians are giving no indications of this.

Instead their Home Minister, Hishamuddin Hussein, said it would depend on bilateral talks, implying that it is something to negotiate over.

Mas Selamat is now under Malaysia's own Internal Security Act (ISA). "He is under our detention and is being investigated right now. He was planning something which allows us to arrest him," he said.

The implication is that Kuala Lumpur may have grounds to detain him for its own security reasons.

If - only a remote if – the investigation were to turn up evidence that the 48-year-old suspect was plotting terrorism in Malaysia during the past year, he might possibly remain under Malaysian detention.

That would put Singapore in an embarrassing situation of seeing escaped detainee remaining outside its grasp.

The Singapore government, especially Home Affairs Minister, Wong Kan Seng, whose is blamed for Kastri's incredible escape 13 months ago, obviously wants Kastari back as quickly as possible.

The Malaysians, on the other hand, appear not to see any urgency in releasing their prize catch. Unless, of course, they can extract some benefits from it!

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.87

Mas Selamat rebuilding terror network in Malaysia, say experts

Mas Selamat rebuilding terror network in Malaysia, say experts
By May Wong, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 08 May 2009 1911 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

Mas Selamat bin Kastari, seen here in 2003
Related News

Singaporeans cheered by news of Mas Selamat's arrest

Singapore government confirms arrest of Mas Selamat

Singapore's JI leader Mas Selamat arrested in Malaysia
Video
Mas Selamat rebuilding terror network in Malaysia, say experts
Special Report
Mas Selamat Arrest

SINGAPORE : Terror experts said fugitive Mas Selamat was rebuilding his terror network in Malaysia and was planning to relocate to Indonesia.

They believe he managed to escape with the help of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) operatives in Malaysia.

While Singaporeans can finally come to rest with his capture, experts said they must continue to be vigilant.

Dr Rohan Gunaratna, a terrorism expert, said: "Mas Selamat is a terrorist with a very high degree of experience, and a man with tremendous determination. There are very few terrorists of that competence and capability, and it demonstrates that Singapore and the region faces a continuous threat. JI is a group that's constantly growing,... constantly active and he's been able to link up with a number of JI members,"

Experts believe that fortunately, Mas Selamat was not able to execute his dangerous operations while in hiding.

"The Malaysians only invoke ISA (Internal Security Act) if it was close to execution stage. So (there's) enough evidence for them to invoke the Act to make the case, that there's a need for the Act to be implemented for Mas Selamat," said terrorism expert Dr Kumar Ramakrishna.

"It's very important for these agencies to find out who Mas Selamat was in contact with, whether these are people already known, whether there are new individuals who are clean skins who have never had records before but are now radicalised and forming support cells, and (whether they have) plans laid for Singapore or anywhere else in region," he added.

Dr Rohan believes the Malaysians have discovered vital information which could lead to more arrests, although getting more out of Mas Selamat won't be easy.

"In terms of breaking Mas Selamat Kastari would require a very significant period of time because he's a very hardened terrorist," said Dr Rohan.

Experts warned that the JI group still poses a profound threat, so authorities need to continue to keep a close watch on them.

Experts said governments should also work more closely with schools and religious institutions to educate the public that JI is a deviant group and that the community should come together to fight such extremism. - CNA /ls


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.37

Why is Mas Selamat arrest a Straits Times scoop?

Why is Mas Selamat arrest a Straits Times scoop?

Why was terrorist Mas Selamat Kastari's arrest first reported in the Straits Times?

One would have expected the government to announce the news, especially after the scandal he caused by escaping from a Singapore prison more than a year ago.

Granted he was rearrested in Malaysia by Malaysian police. But they were tipped off by Singapore intelligence, Singapore's Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng was quick to say after the Straits Times reported the arrest today.

So Singapore can take credit too for his arrest. All the more reason why the government could have broken the news.

But instead the news surfaced in a newspaper that is not known for investigative stories, particularly regarding the government.

The terrorist was arrested on April 1, the Straits Times reported quoting "regional intelligence sources". It added:

A senior Malaysian government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed the arrest…

What the report didn't say is who the "regional intelligence sources" were.

Did they include Singaporeans as well as Malaysians?

The report was quick to give credit to Singapore intelligence. It said:

A source said that the Singapore side had picked up a lead on Mas Selamat's trail towards the end of last year and pursued it.

When they proved to be a credible lead, they passed on the information to the Malaysian authorities…

The report did not say whether the unidentified source was a Singaporean or a Malaysian.

The Straits Times, being a Singapore newspaper, naturally highlighted the good work done by the Singaporeans.

This is the third time Mas Selamat has been tracked down by Singapore's Internal Security Department (ISD), it said.

The terrorist's arrest is a feather in the caps of all those involved. So why was the news broken by a newspaper and not through official channels?

Why did Singapore's deputy prime minister appear on television to confirm the news instead of announcing it? Was it out of politeness that neither government wanted to be first with the news and the story ended up as a Straits Times scoop?

This way everybody wins. One could see the deputy prime minister smiling on Channel NewsAsia.

While the news has been picked up by the BBC, CNN and other foreign media, not everyone in Singapore is making a beeline for the Straits Times despite its scoop.

I was surprised to see stacks of unsold copies at a news stand and two other shops in my neighbourhood in the evening. I had bought a copy at the interchange on my way home expecting to find none near my place.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.35