NMPs should not become subjects of debates

NMPs should not become subjects of debates

WHEN the Nominated MP (NMP) scheme was introduced, the aim was to pluralise views and opinions in Parliament. Moreover, there was concern that People's Action Party MPs would not be put to the test of parliamentary debate.

Today, the scheme is strongly rooted in the nation's political process. It has come to the point where 'campaigning' takes place in the media. In the press and cyberspace, the battle to be heard without electoral accountability is heating up as Parliament seeks new representation under the scheme. That it now attracts a wider pool of groups and organisations, as well as individuals, marks its acceptance as a recognised political stage to be heard.

The scheme has opened Parliament to a number of leaders from different fields. At least one NMP pushed through a Bill one can argue is beneficial to Singaporeans at large. For this, the scheme should be applauded.

However, in the next round of nominations, the scheme could admit individuals or organisations that represent a very small group of Singaporeans or challenge the socio-religious fabric of society.

While either of these resonates well with the spirit of the NMP scheme, they are socio-politically contentious. To conclude that Singaporeans are not socio-politically mature enough to handle diversity of this nature - hence the opposition to certain organisations or individuals - is not right. In fact, it is politically incorrect to say so, and some might argue insensitive too, for if we were, we would not have this discussion.

Singapore society is anchored in two very sensitive dimensions - namely, race and religion. Regardless of the socio-political maturity of Singaporeans, priority must always be given to maintaining the status quo on matters of immediate concern to this balance.

While Parliament is the stage to capture, deliberate and act on diversity in society, where relevant to the nation's well-being and progress, it should not be used as an open market to trade views and opinions of anyone and everyone. There are many other forums and platforms to champion specific interests. If issues are important enough, they will eventually make their way to Parliament.

I urge those who have stepped forward to be nominated to reflect. Will you be the subject of debates in Parliament and outside? If you will, why should taxpayers pay for you to be debated?

Mohd Aminudin Buang

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28866.24