Rebuttal to Gwee Li Su

Rebuttal to Gwee Li Su


Gwee Li Su says :

1 The current scenario is not one where we are being asked what our beliefs on certain issues are or whether Christianity and homosexuality are compatible or we are being mocked or discriminated against. It is a simple context where a group of well-meaning Christians infiltrated a secular organisation in order to be in a position to dictate their own values in its daily running.

Nonsense! What were you smoking when you wrote this? The central issue is not about Christians INFILTRATING a secular organisation “in order to be in a position to dictate their own values in its daily running. ”

This is about the actions of a group of responsible parents who are appalled by an errant organisation which is preaching to our impressionable 12 year old children that anal sex is healthy in contravention the official MOE’s stance that gay anal sex is against the law, specially the Penal Code 377A and its ok for pubescent girls to experiment with each other’s bodies and it is wrong to address the man as a husband but a partner to please the gay student.

In case you have not seen Aware’s CSE training Guide please spend a few minutes to watch this here so that you can make an informed decision!

http://voicethread.com/#q.b468061.i2489061

If this is not a serious deviation from the MOE’s stance on family values why is that the MOE is now investigating this?

Majority of Singaporeans reject this indoctrination of our children that a gay lifestyle is healthy and that same sex marriage should be a norm in this country.

See the petition that has attracted nearly 2000 concerned parents to take a stand and sign up beofre sending it to the MOE.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/parents_sex_ed_appeal/index.html

2″Just as God gave every person free choice and the opportunity to believe, we ought to support the sanctity of this right for others to make up their own minds and live their own lives.”

In Singapore, in case you don’t know, gays are free to “make up their own minds and live their own lives ” but the law does not recognize same sex marriage and gay anal sex is a criminal offense under the Penal Code 377A.

If you have problem with this why don’t you take a stand against the govt?

3″Just as we do not force the Christian faith down someone’s throat against his or her will, we should not take over a non-religious organisation for the single purpose of making others unlike us behave as we believe.”

You are barking up the wrong tree, my friend. This is not about forcing the Christian faith down someone’s throat . It is about saving our children from an organisation which has lost it vision and is corrupting the minds of our young children with donations from a Trust Fund and certain quarters that accept same sex marriage and welcome LGBTs. See Link here :

http://www.todayonline.com/articles/317322print.asp

4 “Support the new ex-co, and you are effectively saying that you condone its quasi-corporate act of infiltration, with related strategies of secrecy, disinformation, moral coercion, and fear-mongering. ”

Nonsense. The new exco won the democratically held elections fair and square.

If there is any fear-mongering it is you who is mixing politics with religion which can explode up like a high octane mixture.

If the old guards were complacent and asleep at the switch they deserved to lose the elections.

All this sound and fury would not have happened without the poor loser old guard asking for an EGM, with recruits of new members, the same ploy which you said amounted to a strategy of secrecy and infiltration when it was done by the new exco but seems to be completely acceptable when it came to the old guards. Why the double standards?


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=27734.267